Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One pattern I have been noticing for months is the growing percentage of sales I am getting from recently-taken images.

A disproportionate amount of money is coming from the images I have taken in the last 12-18 months.

Is this the market or Alamy's search engine? I don't know, but I think the best way to get new sales is to upload new images.

 

I think so.  I mainly use Alamy to license old material that still has saleability.  The ratio of sales to numbers has been good (considering the age of many of the images) and my ranking was ok as far as I could tell - bhz somewhere on page 1 most of the time, if that means anything.  A few rankings back, my bhz image disappeared.  I searched back a few pages and couldn't find it.  Eventually I replaced it with a much more recent image and it not only appeared on page 1 but its position was improved.  I experimented with a few more images, old and new, and got the same result.  I had planned to digitize quite a lot of old material, but won't bother now - a good result really, since now I haven't got any excuse not to spend time on the lucrative activities, rather than getting lost down memory lane. And if I do continue to use Alamy I won't be basing anything on how my bhz or monthly pocket money is doing - probably just personal work here from now on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One pattern I have been noticing for months is the growing percentage of sales I am getting from recently-taken images.

A disproportionate amount of money is coming from the images I have taken in the last 12-18 months.

Is this the market or Alamy's search engine? I don't know, but I think the best way to get new sales is to upload new images.

 

Me too. I was accustomed to pix not selling till they'd been online for 6 months (though I never knew why); now I'm getting sales from recently uploaded pix. And I still don't know why...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"all inside non-cover uses @$312-$625 net each, why they get that & Alamy doesn't, I don't know..."  JG

 

I've been getting book licenses in that range from one supplier, although on distribution - nothing like in your quantity though Jeff.  However it's in New York, it's edited, it's specialist, and books are their speciality.  I doubt if you would get those prices in the UK, even at a top specialist agency.  It's those damn crowd  sourcing sites that did the market in here.

 

No ... hang on ... thay are US based aren't they?  Aren't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One pattern I have been noticing for months is the growing percentage of sales I am getting from recently-taken images.

A disproportionate amount of money is coming from the images I have taken in the last 12-18 months.

Is this the market or Alamy's search engine? I don't know, but I think the best way to get new sales is to upload new images.

 

Me too. I was accustomed to pix not selling till they'd been online for 6 months (though I never knew why); now I'm getting sales from recently uploaded pix. And I still don't know why...

 

 

I'm still finding that it is my older (and old) "bread and butter" images that are keeping me afloat on Alamy. Of the rest, however, recently uploaded images do seem more likely to be zoomed and licensed than ones that inhabit the great in-between. Perhaps this phenomenon has something to do with the "new" button. It must help buyers weed through the overwhelming number of images that come up in many search results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Musn't grumble. Well, I could, but I wont.

 

Let me do it for you, then! ;)

 

0 for $0

 

Really don't know what I'm doing here anymore.  Getting more from DACS than Alamy.

 

 

Hey, at least you're consistent. There's something to be said for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One pattern I have been noticing for months is the growing percentage of sales I am getting from recently-taken images.

A disproportionate amount of money is coming from the images I have taken in the last 12-18 months.

Is this the market or Alamy's search engine? I don't know, but I think the best way to get new sales is to upload new images.

That would be a great pity because I would think that the way to make money on Alamy is the ''long tail'', on other words, images from the past continuing to sell in the future. If images nowadays are only selling for a couple of years or so, that would seriously reduce income in the long term. 

 

However, the 'stats breakdown for October images found' thread gives a bit more hope! 

 

Edit: where's that thread gone? Surely I didn't imagine it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second best month ever for volume with 11 for $296 gross after a very slow start to the month. By the 26th I only had 2 sales but a flurry of newspaper and other sales boosted to 11 by the end of the month. Income a little below average, due to the newspaper sales, as I have been averaging $40 per image.

 

Volume and revenue also overtaken last years figures, in fact revenue has gone up every year for each of the 8 years i've been with Alamy.

 

Zooms equalled best ever rolling monthly totals and CTR above average.

 

I haven't found that recently taken images are selling. I've uploaded 455 taken in 2015 and non of them have sold so far.

 

All in all i'm happy with Alamy.

 

John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to sound negative, but judging from the monthly gross incomes being reported here, the average price per image (PPI) does appear to be declining (only $37 PPI for me in October).

 

Us Forum people must be doing something wrong here..... Alamy state that the average licence fee is $90.

 

http://www.alamy.com/contributor/why-alamy/how-much-money-can-i-make/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.