Images sold in July 2019

[NYCat]

47 minutes ago, Marb said:

Thanks, I didn't know that. A small consolation at least.

 

I was surprised to see this sale for you, Marb, because I've assumed you follow the forum. A number of us had this experience with the same website and chose to opt out of Novel Use as a result. Unfortunately, the only time you can opt out is in April so it is a long wait for you. I was OK with the idea of a novel use but a travel website is not novel and I had two of my images go to them.

 

Paulette

[spacecadet]

Here's mine at that price. Sir Josh at the RA.

First of the month as well.

[Steve Hyde]

[gvallee]

8 hours ago, spacecadet said:

DBH41b is some bread rolls🤨

 

I was actually referring to the Alamy reference B51CAR. 

Having the number plate as Alamy ref would have been extraordinary indeed. 

 

 

[gvallee]

7 hours ago, Sally said:

Or choose to remain in because sales will increase your ranking.

 

I would be careful with that statement. As mentioned before, NU used to be excluded from ranking when the scheme came up, precisely because of low prices.

These days, nobody knows.

[Bionic]

Ok, I'm new here so please be gentle but I'm intrigued. Nu? I cant for the life of me think what that could be....... stands back and prepares to feel really stupid

[VbFolly]

7 minutes ago, Bionic said:

Ok, I'm new here so please be gentle but I'm intrigued. Nu? I cant for the life of me think what that could be....... stands back and prepares to feel really stupid

Novel use

[LSP]

Algal bloom washing up on beach, Fitzroy Island, Great Barrier Reef. Low $$ for a book in South Korea.

[Alan Beastall]

Education book for a good $$.

Alan

 

 

[Stan Pritchard]

Derelict lime kiln. Chapel-le-Dale near Ingleton. Yorkshire Dales National Park, England, U.K., Europe. 

 

Country: Worldwide
Usage: Single company - multiple educational editorial use onlyUpgrade
Industry sector: Media, design & publishing
Start: 11 July 2019
End: 11 July 2069

[Colblimp]

20 hours ago, Marb said:

 

That's a great shot Colb. Well deserved and good for you to get a decent amount.

Thanks, pleased with the amount.

[Avpics]

An EU PU, of an old 2005 image trawled from storage and uploaded more recently:

 

 

[spacecadet]

14 hours ago, Steve Hyde said:

Makes you wonder why they put up with us.

[Michael Ventura]

A swordfish dinner in Williamsburg, Virginia (Nikon D700 with a 105 Micro Nikkor).  Magazine use for high $$.

 

[Brasilnut]

[John Mitchell]

A Swedish distributor sale (high $$, book use).

 

[spacecadet]

Dubai news website, distro, $, 5 years.

 

 

[IanDavidson]

My picture of Sir Simon Woolley used by Wikipedia 

https://www.alamy.com/image-details-popup.asp?Imageid=35D66B04-3F91-4B1A-900E-BE646C810369. Although with the old caption for some reason 

Country: Worldwide
Usage: Editorial, Editorial - websites, apps, social media and blogs (excludes advertising). Worldwide for 5 years.
Media: Editorial website
Image Size: Any size
Start: 05 July 2019
End: 05 July 2024

Mid $$ 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Woolley

 

[spacecadet]

4 hours ago, IanDavidson said:

My picture of Sir Simon Woolley used by Wikipedia 

https://www.alamy.com/image-details-popup.asp?Imageid=35D66B04-3F91-4B1A-900E-BE646C810369. Although with the old caption for some reason 

Country: Worldwide
Usage: Editorial, Editorial - websites, apps, social media and blogs (excludes advertising). Worldwide for 5 years.
Media: Editorial website
Image Size: Any size
Start: 05 July 2019
End: 05 July 2024

Mid $$ 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Woolley

 

I don't know if this is a problem for you, but I should have a careful look at the licence- Wikipedia seem to think it's under a CC licence and it's not credited.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sir_Simon_Woolley.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

[Young]

My first sale of the month.

Sold only $, but I'm glad cause I like this one.

Newspaper Editorial print and digital use  

 

 

 

[British Gent]

On 12/07/2019 at 12:41, Michael Ventura said:

A swordfish dinner in Williamsburg, Virginia (Nikon D700 with a 105 Micro Nikkor).  Magazine use for high $$.

 

 

Did dinner pay for itself that day?

[Michael Ventura]

38 minutes ago, British Gent said:

 

Did dinner pay for itself that day?

 

Actually in this case, it was shot for a destination client and they approved of putting the images on Alamy.  

[Cryptoprocta]

On 13/07/2019 at 16:17, spacecadet said:

I don't know if this is a problem for you, but I should have a careful look at the licence- Wikipedia seem to think it's under a CC licence and it's not credited.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sir_Simon_Woolley.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

I was surprised to read about the sale to Wikipedia, as I understood all images used there had to be CC,. then realised that that was based on info which was several years old.

But maybe nothing has changed. Interesting though, I've looked up articles on personalities which had no pics and assumed that's because there were no CC pics of the person available. I didn't think they'd licence pics for that reason.

 

However, this page is interesting. Further down, the file's metadata credits the copyright to Ian Davidson/Alamy, and there's also a mention in a red outlined box that:

"This media file is missing evidence of permission. It may have an author and a source, but there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by sending a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added and the uploader was notified (8 July 2019)."

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sir_Simon_Woolley.jpg#filelinks

But immediately below that it credits Sir Simon himself as the author or the work.

I guess you should contact Alamy first about this: they shouldn't really be licensing images to Wikipedia when most users assume (on history) that photos there are CC.

[IanDavidson]

7 hours ago, Cryptoprocta said:

I was surprised to read about the sale to Wikipedia, as I understood all images used there had to be CC,. then realised that that was based on info which was several years old.

But maybe nothing has changed. Interesting though, I've looked up articles on personalities which had no pics and assumed that's because there were no CC pics of the person available. I didn't think they'd licence pics for that reason.

 

However, this page is interesting. Further down, the file's metadata credits the copyright to Ian Davidson/Alamy, and there's also a mention in a red outlined box that:

"This media file is missing evidence of permission. It may have an author and a source, but there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by sending a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added and the uploader was notified (8 July 2019)."

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sir_Simon_Woolley.jpg#filelinks

But immediately below that it credits Sir Simon himself as the author or the work.

I guess you should contact Alamy first about this: they shouldn't really be licensing images to Wikipedia when most users assume (on history) that photos there are CC.

I have been paid for this.  I do not know if by Wikipedia or by the OBV organisation (that Sir Simon is Chairman) that then passed it to them.  The organisation has told me they will get Wikipedia to change the incorrect credit.  As long as I have been paid.....

[Young]

Beach with vegetation of nature reserve near Ostia, Rome, Lazio, Italy- Image ID: P6C8ED

 

 

Country: Worldwide RM for mid $$