Jump to content

Post a bad thing that happened in your life today


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MDM said:

This is what you are looking for?

That’s a landranger map rather than the pathfinder range that Allan was looking for. The difference is that whilst the landranger is 1:50000 the pathfinder is 1:25000 scale which is much more useful depending on your intended usage ( 1:25000 is more helpful for more accurate work ie local walks and geology etc). Both sets are a dream for boring folks like me that can sit and look at maps all day long but the different scales do suit different needs :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bionic said:

That’s a landranger map rather than the pathfinder range that Allan was looking for. The difference is that whilst the landranger is 1:50000 the pathfinder is 1:25000 scale which is much more useful depending on your intended usage ( 1:25000 is more helpful for more accurate work ie local walks and geology etc). Both sets are a dream for boring folks like me that can sit and look at maps all day long but the different scales do suit different needs :)

 

OK thanks for enlightening.  I have accumulated a lot of OS Maps over the years but didn't realise the difference there (my British ones are Landranger or Explorer which are 1:25,000 but restricted to certain areas it seems). Doing a search on Amazon, it  looks like the Pathfinders are no longer made. I guess so many people use digital maps now and they can usually go to very large scales so self-printing may be the best option if paper is required. For geology, the BGS website is the place for online geological maps in Britain - an excellent resource.

Edited by MDM
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Mitchell said:

 

I found this. It sounds like what you're referring too.

 

You're right about the floaters. They've almost disappeared now (I'm 71). At one time, I had a veritable snow storm of them.

Yep. I’m rusty, but I remember that information.  And, of course, I’ve had floaters myself along with flashing lights, fog, wavy vision and even foggy half vision. All of that Weird vision was from ocular migraines, though. Just not saw it all at the same time! 😊 sometimes it seemed I’d deliberately look at a bright window and try to directly see the floater, but of course the pesky thing would “seem” to dart away. They appear much larger than they actually are.
I enjoyed my 10 years as an Opthalmologist assistant. I assisted the doctor during exams, did contact lens training sessions, did visual fields, assisted in office surgery, patched eyes with pressure patches and put in the eye drops during exams. Also took medical histories and sterilized instruments, scrubbed down exam rooms with alcohol.

Funny thing. The first office surgery I assisted with was on a woman. She was lying down, but as the procedure began, she felt faint. The doctor told me to break an ammonia capsule and wave it under her nose. I did. Then I sat on a high stool until he needed me, and watched. When he started mopping blood from the surface of the eyeball, stringing it up, I got very dizzy. A blue iris floating in a sea of blood didn’t appeal. 
Stringing it really didn’t.

So I sneakily waved the ammonia under my own nose and the doctor caught the slight movement, turned and looked at me and grinned his fool head off. So much for trying to fly under the radar.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Betty LaRue said:

Yep. I’m rusty, but I remember that information.  And, of course, I’ve had floaters myself along with flashing lights, fog, wavy vision and even foggy half vision. All of that Weird vision was from ocular migraines, though. Just not saw it all at the same time! 😊 sometimes it seemed I’d deliberately look at a bright window and try to directly see the floater, but of course the pesky thing would “seem” to dart away. They appear much larger than they actually are.
I enjoyed my 10 years as an Opthalmologist assistant. I assisted the doctor during exams, did contact lens training sessions, did visual fields, assisted in office surgery, patched eyes with pressure patches and put in the eye drops during exams. Also took medical histories and sterilized instruments, scrubbed down exam rooms with alcohol.

Funny thing. The first office surgery I assisted with was on a woman. She was lying down, but as the procedure began, she felt faint. The doctor told me to break an ammonia capsule and wave it under her nose. I did. Then I sat on a high stool until he needed me, and watched. When he started mopping blood from the surface of the eyeball, stringing it up, I got very dizzy. A blue iris floating in a sea of blood didn’t appeal. 
Stringing it really didn’t.

So I sneakily waved the ammonia under my own nose and the doctor caught the slight movement, turned and looked at me and grinned his fool head off. So much for trying to fly under the radar.

 

This is an unfair question to ask, but in your experience when do most people get cataract surgery? My eye physician/surgeon, who is very good, is pushing me to have him do my cataracts now, even though they aren't "ripe" yet. He says that it's best to have the operation done when you're a bit younger -- not that I'm especially young -- because it's easier to get the lenses out and the eyes heal more quickly. I think that I could probably go another year or two. Hate to say it, but I'm a bit suspicious because eye surgeons here are a wealthy bunch. They bill the government a lot for cataract removal (it's free for me fortunately), and my doctor is as old as I am. Chances are he wants to retire as rich as possible. Can't blame him, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is always what my doctor told his patients. “They are ready to come out when they hinder what you want to do”.  
In other words, a reader will probably want them out before a farmer, given the same stage of vision.

An artist will want them out sooner. If you drive a lot, over here you need your best eye to be able to see (be corrected to) 20/40, with glasses if they help.

There really isn’t such a thing as “ripe”. But if one waits a long time, the cataract can harden and be a bit more difficult to remove.

All a cataract is is a clouding of the lens in your eye. The lens, when young bends and flexes as you look from near to far. 
 

As one ages, the material in the lens becomes stiffer, and the eye muscles have to work harder to bend it. When the lens gets stiff enough to be unable to bend enough for close up focusing, that’s why we need reading glasses.  Someone who has always been nearsighted need glasses to see distance, but often can read without.

Aside from “bending and focusing”, the material within the lens gets progressively cloudier when you have cataracts.

You are in the driver’s seat. Only you know when you can’t see well enough to do what you want to do, nobody else should make that decision.  If your vision reaches a point where you no longer can legally drive, and driving is important, then it’s time.
 

I had mine done. I’ve never needed glasses for distance, but my cataracts got cloudy enough that I had trouble reading street signs while driving. One eye was worse than the other. Television became blurrier, and I had trouble discerning how sharp my images were.

I had one eye done, then a week later I had the other done. Never regretted it. But it was my decision, not the doctor’s. Another thing about cataracts. The material within the lens not only gets cloudy, but usually takes on an amber tint, which throws off how you see colors. Like having amber tinted sunglasses on.
After surgery, I couldn’t believe how bright colors were, and how sharp blades of grass looked, even my hair looked sharp and weird! Before surgery, I think my vision was 20/50 in one eye and I just was still seeing 20/40 in the other. So not real bad. But it hindered my reading street signs while driving, hindered knowing if an image was in focus before pressing the shutter and my telling if it were sharp on the computer, so I made that decision. Besides, I watch American college football and it was a bit blurry, too. 😊 Couldn’t have that. I’m a big reader and one eye started twitching with fatigue.
I quit occasionally failing submissions after surgery, too. I wasn’t having to guess if they were sharp enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Allan Bell said:

 

I really ought to start my own blog for this.

 

Back to bus station to catch the bus home again. Now I should have had my glasses (specs) on - but I didn't. Caught the bus that was at the stand where the number 3 waits. We set off and after a little while I noted the bus was going a different way. I ended up at Lincoln hospital. Had a word with the driver when he stopped at a stop in the hospital grounds pointing in the opposite direction to which I needed to go and told him I think I have caught the wrong bus. "Where do you want to go?" he said. "To Cherry Willingham" I replied. "You want the number 3 bus" he said. "I know that and thought I was on the number 3" I said. "This is the X6 for the hospital only" he said. "Stay on the bus and I'll try to get back to the bus station so you will be in time to catch the the next number 3" he said. As we approached the bus station the driver said "The number 3 is just leaving, sorry". "Thank you for trying" I said.

 

When we arrived in C W I managed to get off at the stop before the one I wanted. ARRRRGH! Another extra 5 minute walk on top of the time it usually takes me to get to my bungalow from the correct stop.

 

After all that the only good thing to come out of it was I still managed to get to the surgery on time for my appointment.

 

Sorry I just had to get the above off my chest. Enjoy and have a laugh on me.

 

Allan

 

 

Put it down to experience Allan. 

 

I confess to being a frequent bus traveller. I'd normally cycle to work, but if there was a lot of black ice about, I'd take the bus.

 

Since retiring, and armed with a free bus pass, I use the buses a great deal more. Walk to the shops and get the bus back, take the bus along the coast and walk back etc.

 

It's got to the point where I can advise fellow travellers on appropriate bus usage !

 

However even an experienced bus traveller can come unstuck. I recently took the bus home after leaving the car for a service. This was advanced bus usage, requiring two buses. Unknown to me there were roadworks in the town where I needed to swap buses, and the bus stopped outside the town and then drove off along a fast dual carriageway, with me still aboard. Irritating for sure, but logged into the bus company's WiFi I could do the Guardian crossword. Got off at the next settlement and caught a bus back etc.

 

In the world of the bus you have to be prepared for any eventuality! I could tell you of the time when it snowed and the bus slithered to a halt on a steep hill, or when on a coach along the motorway a car cut in in front, clipped the front of our vehicle and then summersaulted onto the grassy roadside bank. The driver emerged unscathed.

 

Sadly, with a recent surge in the number of cases of the virus in these parts, I fear that I shall have to curtail my bus travel. Bike, shanks's pony, or, as a last resort, the car for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for all the info, Betty. I obviously asked the right person. Are your IOL's the monofocal type? Those are the kind that I'd be getting as the Canadian healthcare system doesn't pay for the much more expensive multifocal ones. The lenses would be set for distance, which means I will still have to wear glasses for reading and perhaps computer work (not sure about this). I currently wear glasses with progressive lenses. As it is, I can see OK, with a few exceptions -- e.g TV subtitles. Driving at night can be a bit tricky sometimes as I start to see halos and "stars" around oncoming headlights. One of my eyes is worse than the other. Sounds like that's common. BTW, "not ripe" was the term my eye doctor used. I assumed he meant that my cataracts still have a way to go before I'm in big trouble.

 

P.S. I guess this discussion is sort of photography related. No eyes, no pics. Sorry if I'm boring anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, John Mitchell said:

 

This is an unfair question to ask, but in your experience when do most people get cataract surgery? My eye physician/surgeon, who is very good, is pushing me to have him do my cataracts now, even though they aren't "ripe" yet. He says that it's best to have the operation done when you're a bit younger -- not that I'm especially young -- because it's easier to get the lenses out and the eyes heal more quickly. I think that I could probably go another year or two. Hate to say it, but I'm a bit suspicious because eye surgeons here are a wealthy bunch. They bill the government a lot for cataract removal (it's free for me fortunately), and my doctor is as old as I am. Chances are he wants to retire as rich as possible. Can't blame him, of course.


 

 

2 hours ago, John Mitchell said:

Thanks very much for all the info, Betty. I obviously asked the right person. Are your IOL's the monofocal type? Those are the kind that I'd be getting as the Canadian healthcare system doesn't pay for the much more expensive multifocal ones. The lenses would be set for distance, which means I will still have to wear glasses for reading and perhaps computer work (not sure about this). I currently wear glasses with progressive lenses. As it is, I can see OK, with a few exceptions -- e.g TV subtitles. Driving at night can be a bit tricky sometimes as I start to see halos and "stars" around oncoming headlights. One of my eyes is worse than the other. Sounds like that's common. BTW, "not ripe" was the term my eye doctor used. I assumed he meant that my cataracts still have a way to go before I'm in big trouble.

 

P.S. I guess this discussion is sort of photography related. No eyes, no pics. Sorry if I'm boring anyone.


I recall talking about this before with you  but having lens replacement surgery was the closest thing to rebirth I have ever experienced. I had mine done 4 years ago and wish I had done it years before. Like you I was being told the cataracts were not ripe and I was waiting to get it done for free on the NHS here but due to ongoing government cutbacks they kept raising the bar every year for how bad they had to be so by the time I decide to pay for the surgery you had to be virtually blind in an eye test to get it done. By the sounds of it your eyes are probably worse than mine were. I guess most people go for years before getting surgery and then wish they had done it much sooner. 

 

As a photographer it becomes even more critical. For me it was like having old, yellow filters in front of my eyes. The experience of waking up the day after the first operation and seeing everything really sharp with beautifully clear colours, properly saturated and the yellow filter gone is one of the standout moments of my life. As I didn’t get the other eye done for a few weeks, I was able to compare and the difference was amazing. My only regret was waiting so long to get it done. 
 

Mine are mono focal  and I still wear reading glasses but I have perfect distance vision. The surgeon recommended the mono vocals as he said they are a lot less likely to have complications afterwards. The bit about age is also likely true. I was in my early 60s. 
 

So my advice is get them done now, yesterday, ASAP.  


One other thing. The deterioration is so gradual you don’t notice it happening so it becomes normal to have imperfect eyesight. The change when you take the eye shield off after the operation is truly  and literally  amazing. 
 

 

Edited by MDM
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Ognyan Yosifov said:

You must have taken A LOT of images  on that "trip" ...

 

Just a few.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, MDM said:

 

Actually Allen, you did make me laugh so some good came out of it. You need to get a smartphone or tablet and you could download whatever you need. That said I still like a good ole paper map and am surprised the OS are no longer making them. Have you checked online?  Of course you could download and print your own if you want paper maps. 

 

Be careful travelling on buses unless you absolutely have to do so. People are very complacent despite the massive increase in Covid-19 cases.  

 

Thank you Mick. Actually around this area everyone seems to be taking covid seriously and abide by all the rules.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bryan said:

 

Put it down to experience Allan. 

 

I confess to being a frequent bus traveller. I'd normally cycle to work, but if there was a lot of black ice about, I'd take the bus.

 

Since retiring, and armed with a free bus pass, I use the buses a great deal more. Walk to the shops and get the bus back, take the bus along the coast and walk back etc.

 

It's got to the point where I can advise fellow travellers on appropriate bus usage !

 

However even an experienced bus traveller can come unstuck. I recently took the bus home after leaving the car for a service. This was advanced bus usage, requiring two buses. Unknown to me there were roadworks in the town where I needed to swap buses, and the bus stopped outside the town and then drove off along a fast dual carriageway, with me still aboard. Irritating for sure, but logged into the bus company's WiFi I could do the Guardian crossword. Got off at the next settlement and caught a bus back etc.

 

In the world of the bus you have to be prepared for any eventuality! I could tell you of the time when it snowed and the bus slithered to a halt on a steep hill, or when on a coach along the motorway a car cut in in front, clipped the front of our vehicle and then summersaulted onto the grassy roadside bank. The driver emerged unscathed.

 

Sadly, with a recent surge in the number of cases of the virus in these parts, I fear that I shall have to curtail my bus travel. Bike, shanks's pony, or, as a last resort, the car for now.

 

I like using the bus too and people around here seem to be sticking to the covid rules.

 

Allan

 

Edited by Allan Bell
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Allan Bell said:

 

Thank you Mick. Actually around this area everyone seems to be taking covid seriously and abide by all the rules.

 

Allan

 

 

So that assumes that following the rules will keep you safe. I would think that is a very dangerous (literally dangerous that is) assumption given the unbelievable levels of incompetence we have experienced and continue to experience by those who make up and apply these rules.

 

In order to get on with my day I will try to keep this short. Testing capacity is currently at about 20% of what is needed so once again nobody has any realistic idea of the actual number of cases, locally or nationally. I find it truly incredible that those who supposedly manage all this did not foresee that there would be a greatly increased need for tests by now, firstly after society opened up again in most parts of the country over the summer and secondly as kids go back to school simply because of all the interactions. But testing capacity is greatly depleted again because nobody had the foresight to realise that the number of cases would start to increase again significantly. 

 

Open the schools at any cost - they are safe places is the message, but don't forget that a lot of kids are asymptomatic and infectious at the same time. Keep them in year group bubbles - that should work. Of course they won't meet up with their friends or family outside of those bubbles - or will they? Shut the pubs early - that might work. What insight they have into the drinking habits of the masses. How about a rule of 6 (did they throw a dice for that one)? Don't wear a mask, wear a mask. 

 

Trust the rules to keep you safe. Tell that to all those who died in care homes. But don't forget this is not just about death. This is a serious and potentially life-shattering illness for those of us who got through round 1. We await round 2.

 

OK I said short. It could be a long essay. Take care Allan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by MDM
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MDM said:

 

So that assumes that following the rules will keep you safe. I would think that is a very dangerous (literally dangerous that is) assumption given the unbelievable levels of incompetence we have experienced and continue to experience by those who make up and apply these rules.

 

In order to get on with my day I will try to keep this short. Testing capacity is currently at about 20% of what is needed so once again nobody has any realistic idea of the actual number of cases, locally or nationally. I find it truly incredible that those who supposedly manage all this did not foresee that there would be a greatly increased need for tests by now, firstly after society opened up again in most parts of the country over the summer and secondly as kids go back to school simply because of all the interactions. But testing capacity is greatly depleted again because nobody had the foresight to realise that the number of cases would start to increase again significantly. 

 

Open the schools at any cost - they are safe places is the message, but don't forget that a lot of kids are asymptomatic and infectious at the same time. Keep them in year group bubbles - that should work. Of course they won't meet up with their friends or family outside of those bubbles - or will they? Shut the pubs early - that might work. What insight they have into the drinking habits of the masses. How about a rule of 6 (did they throw a dice for that one)? Don't wear a mask, wear a mask. 

 

Trust the rules to keep you safe. Tell that to all those who died in care homes. But don't forget this is not just about death. This is a serious and potentially life-shattering illness for those of us who got through round 1. We await round 2.

 

OK I said short. It could be a long essay. Take care Allan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree wholeheartedly with your comments. Be assured I am doing all I can to keep safe and not taking anything for granted.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, MDM said:

 

So that assumes that following the rules will keep you safe. I would think that is a very dangerous (literally dangerous that is) assumption given the unbelievable levels of incompetence we have experienced and continue to experience by those who make up and apply these rules.

 

In order to get on with my day I will try to keep this short. Testing capacity is currently at about 20% of what is needed so once again nobody has any realistic idea of the actual number of cases, locally or nationally. I find it truly incredible that those who supposedly manage all this did not foresee that there would be a greatly increased need for tests by now, firstly after society opened up again in most parts of the country over the summer and secondly as kids go back to school simply because of all the interactions. But testing capacity is greatly depleted again because nobody had the foresight to realise that the number of cases would start to increase again significantly. 

 

Open the schools at any cost - they are safe places is the message, but don't forget that a lot of kids are asymptomatic and infectious at the same time. Keep them in year group bubbles - that should work. Of course they won't meet up with their friends or family outside of those bubbles - or will they? Shut the pubs early - that might work. What insight they have into the drinking habits of the masses. How about a rule of 6 (did they throw a dice for that one)? Don't wear a mask, wear a mask. 

 

Trust the rules to keep you safe. Tell that to all those who died in care homes. But don't forget this is not just about death. This is a serious and potentially life-shattering illness for those of us who got through round 1. We await round 2.

 

OK I said short. It could be a long essay. Take care Allan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

we are having same problems in Ontario.   Testing is a mess, people lining up at 4:30am today in 1 degree weather to be told at 7:30, here is a time slot,  come back at 11am (when they will have to wait for 3-4 hours based on last few days).  

 

Kids not allowed back in class if they had sniffles until they get negative testing.   

 

We now have 2 Federal party leaders testing positive this week (while thankfully parliament was prorogued ), including the new Conservative leader of the opposition,  who said he was going to use Boris Johnson as model, I guess he is going literal on this.  

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MDM said:


 

 


I recall talking about this before with you  but having lens replacement surgery was the closest thing to rebirth I have ever experienced. I had mine done 4 years ago and wish I had done it years before. Like you I was being told the cataracts were not ripe and I was waiting to get it done for free on the NHS here but due to ongoing government cutbacks they kept raising the bar every year for how bad they had to be so by the time I decide to pay for the surgery you had to be virtually blind in an eye test to get it done. By the sounds of it your eyes are probably worse than mine were. I guess most people go for years before getting surgery and then wish they had done it much sooner. 

 

As a photographer it becomes even more critical. For me it was like having old, yellow filters in front of my eyes. The experience of waking up the day after the first operation and seeing everything really sharp with beautifully clear colours, properly saturated and the yellow filter gone is one of the standout moments of my life. As I didn’t get the other eye done for a few weeks, I was able to compare and the difference was amazing. My only regret was waiting so long to get it done. 
 

Mine are mono focal  and I still wear reading glasses but I have perfect distance vision. The surgeon recommended the mono vocals as he said they are a lot less likely to have complications afterwards. The bit about age is also likely true. I was in my early 60s. 
 

So my advice is get them done now, yesterday, ASAP.  


One other thing. The deterioration is so gradual you don’t notice it happening so it becomes normal to have imperfect eyesight. The change when you take the eye shield off after the operation is truly  and literally  amazing. 
 

 

 

Thanks. I remember that conversation. At the time, my eye doctor was not suggesting that I get the cataracts done yet. From what I've been reading online, I've gotten the impression that the monofocal lenses are less problematic. That's good to know. BTW, do you now need glasses when doing work on the computer?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, meanderingemu said:

we are having same problems in Ontario.   Testing is a mess, people lining up at 4:30am today in 1 degree weather to be told at 7:30, here is a time slot,  come back at 11am (when they will have to wait for 3-4 hours based on last few days).  

 

Kids not allowed back in class if they had sniffles until they get negative testing.   

 

We now have 2 Federal party leaders testing positive this week (while thankfully parliament was prorogued ), including the new Conservative leader of the opposition,  who said he was going to use Boris Johnson as model, I guess he is going literal on this.  

 

It's a disease and so is Covid-19. Say no more lest it becomes political 😎.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, John Mitchell said:

 

Thanks. I remember that conversation. At the time, my eye doctor was not suggesting that I get the cataracts done yet. From what I've been reading online, I've gotten the impression that the monofocal lenses are less problematic. That's good to know. BTW, do you now need glasses when doing work on the computer?

 

Yes but only for computer and reading. Four years on and I still have perfect distance eyesight. It is no exaggeration to say what a huge effect it had on my life and especially on my photography. I was having the same problem not seeing things really clearly on screen in terms of sharpness. And the colours - really incredible change. If you can get this done free go for it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDM said:

 

Yes but only for computer and reading. Four years on and I still have perfect distance eyesight. It is no exaggeration to say what a huge effect it had on my life and especially on my photography. I was having the same problem not seeing things really clearly on screen in terms of sharpness. And the colours - really incredible change. If you can get this done free go for it.

 

Thanks again. I've been very lucky with my eyesight. I didn't need reading glasses until I was in my early 50's, and my distance vision held up until I was 65. It has been a gradual decline since then. I was hoping that I wouldn't need glasses for computer work after the cataract surgery. Oh well, it's a trade-off, I suppose...

 

Stay well.

 

Never Mind Homer GIF by MOODMAN

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/09/2020 at 21:29, MDM said:

This is what you are looking for?

 

 

i was going to say the same as Bionic.  Already answered.

 

Allan

 

Edited by Allan Bell
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, MDM said:

 

So how about this  and/or this and/or this 

 

I have the Huawei Y6 2019 smartish phone which I had to get quickly in Lincoln when my Sony Experia Compact packed up just before travelling back to Cambridge. Also a Nokia Lumia 530 which was a backup phone purchased a few years ago and do not like it. Then I bought an original iPhone SE from a friend last year and wondering why.

 

Used to have an iPad but gave it to my daughter.

 

Also have an Epson XP-335 printer which I bought quickly after my previous printer packed up.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/09/2020 at 00:52, John Mitchell said:

Thanks very much for all the info, Betty. I obviously asked the right person. Are your IOL's the monofocal type? Those are the kind that I'd be getting as the Canadian healthcare system doesn't pay for the much more expensive multifocal ones. The lenses would be set for distance, which means I will still have to wear glasses for reading and perhaps computer work (not sure about this). I currently wear glasses with progressive lenses. As it is, I can see OK, with a few exceptions -- e.g TV subtitles. Driving at night can be a bit tricky sometimes as I start to see halos and "stars" around oncoming headlights. One of my eyes is worse than the other. Sounds like that's common. BTW, "not ripe" was the term my eye doctor used. I assumed he meant that my cataracts still have a way to go before I'm in big trouble.

 

P.S. I guess this discussion is sort of photography related. No eyes, no pics. Sorry if I'm boring anyone.

Mine are mono. I could have had the other, but chose not to. For instance, I’ve only ever worn reading glasses. The kind (half glasses) that I can look up over to see distance, but I only put them on for close work.  I tried the multi focal glasses. Didn’t like tilting my head to find the narrow strip that brought something into focus.

When my astigmatism got worse, I had a seldom used pair for driving with the astigmatism correction. They were distance only. 
I just carry on with reading glasses now, but no longer have to have a prescription for them. The astigmatism was corrected with the implants. Now I can go to the drugstore and buy off the shelf readers that save me a lot of dollars.
Don’t let anyone push you into the surgery. You will know when it’s time, when you are no longer happy with your vision. I must say, though, once you do it you’ll find the difference in how the world looks to you quite remarkable.
 

About the “ripe” word. I guess my opinion came from listening to the Ophthalmologist I worked for. If a patient used that word, the doctor quickly said “no such thing”.  Probably so people wouldn’t think of cataracts like a ripe tomato with the next stage going to rot!

 

When I observed cataract surgery, the procedure involved a small hand tool that broke up the cloudy material and sucked it out. That’s why I said waiting until that material becomes harder makes the procedure a bit harder. The material would need a bit of extra time to get the pieces broken down small enough for suction.

I've been out of the profession for years. Considering the amazing advancements always going on in medicine, the tools most assuredly have changed. Perhaps there is no difference in older, stiffer cataract removal these days. Plus no matter what, even back then it wasn’t at all any big problem to wait for surgery anyway. Possibly an extra minute or two difference during the procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Betty LaRue said:

Mine are mono. I could have had the other, but chose not to. For instance, I’ve only ever worn reading glasses. The kind (half glasses) that I can look up over to see distance, but I only put them on for close work.  I tried the multi focal glasses. Didn’t like tilting my head to find the narrow strip that brought something into focus.

When my astigmatism got worse, I had a seldom used pair for driving with the astigmatism correction. They were distance only. 
I just carry on with reading glasses now, but no longer have to have a prescription for them. The astigmatism was corrected with the implants. Now I can go to the drugstore and buy off the shelf readers that save me a lot of dollars.
Don’t let anyone push you into the surgery. You will know when it’s time, when you are no longer happy with your vision. I must say, though, once you do it you’ll find the difference in how the world looks to you quite remarkable.
 

About the “ripe” word. I guess my opinion came from listening to the Ophthalmologist I worked for. If a patient used that word, the doctor quickly said “no such thing”.  Probably so people wouldn’t think of cataracts like a ripe tomato with the next stage going to rot!

 

When I observed cataract surgery, the procedure involved a small hand tool that broke up the cloudy material and sucked it out. That’s why I said waiting until that material becomes harder makes the procedure a bit harder. The material would need a bit of extra time to get the pieces broken down small enough for suction.

I've been out of the profession for years. Considering the amazing advancements always going on in medicine, the tools most assuredly have changed. Perhaps there is no difference in older, stiffer cataract removal these days. Plus no matter what, even back then it wasn’t at all any big problem to wait for surgery anyway. Possibly an extra minute or two difference during the procedure.

 

I'd only ever worn reading glasses as well -- the inexpensive magnifiers that you buy at the drugstore. It took me quite a long time to get used to tipping my head back and forth like a woodpecker with my current multi-focal "specs", but I'm used to it now. One thing I do like about the progressive lenses is that I don't have to keep taking my glasses on and off all the time, except when using my camera's viewfinder of course. Anyway, I'm going to book another appointment with my eye doc so that I can ask him a few more questions. Shall probably have the surgery done early next year, depending how the COVID disaster goes. Thanks very much for all the info. I feel much better now. 🌞

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m sure glad improvements have advanced treatment since the time my father had his cataracts removed in the mid-1970s. Though he was younger than fifty, he had developed terrible cataracts from being a radarman in the US Navy during WWII. For the removal, he had to be hospitalized for a couple of days and kept immobile for the first 24 hours after the surgery. Afterwards, his vision was forever horrible, and he had to wear hard contact lenses that were constantly getting dislodged, along with different types of glasses, depending on what he was doing. It was all quite frustrating. These days, it seems such a comparatively simple procedure. Still, I plan to avoid surgery until mine start to become problematic. Hopefully, that’s a few years away. I’ve worn two different contacts for years: one in my non-dominent eye for reading and the other for distance. I rarely ever wear my glasses and my optometrist tells me having the same type of lenses implanted after cataract removal should work well for me. That would be nice since glasses drive me nuts.

 

John, would a second opinion from another doctor be an option?
 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/09/2020 at 12:36, Cecile Marion said:

I’m sure glad improvements have advanced treatment since the time my father had his cataracts removed in the mid-1970s. Though he was younger than fifty, he had developed terrible cataracts from being a radarman in the US Navy during WWII. For the removal, he had to be hospitalized for a couple of days and kept immobile for the first 24 hours after the surgery. Afterwards, his vision was forever horrible, and he had to wear hard contact lenses that were constantly getting dislodged, along with different types of glasses, depending on what he was doing. It was all quite frustrating. These days, it seems such a comparatively simple procedure. Still, I plan to avoid surgery until mine start to become problematic. Hopefully, that’s a few years away. I’ve worn two different contacts for years: one in my non-dominent eye for reading and the other for distance. I rarely ever wear my glasses and my optometrist tells me having the same type of lenses implanted after cataract removal should work well for me. That would be nice since glasses drive me nuts.

 

John, would a second opinion from another doctor be an option?
 

 

 

If you’ve had one eye at different focus than the other, yes, you should adapt to implants done that way as well. When I first needed readers, I tried a contact for near. I really didn’t get on with it. Part of that, for me, is when one eye focuses near and the other far, it messes with your depth of field because both eyes never focus together.  
Apparently you got used to it easily, I didn’t. My oldest sister had her implants split like that. She’s complained about her vision and avoids reading ever since. I think she didn’t adapt, like me.  Her doctor (Not my doctor) should have done the contact thing with her first to see if she could adapt to it.  He talked her into doing it that way.

Back when your dad had his done, there were no implants probably, but they were on the horizon soon after. The whole lens was taken out and the only way to see was contacts or coke bottle thick lenses. If one had astigmatism, which is caused by the cornea having a different degree of slope than the other plane, shaped a bit like the back of a spoon, the only way to correct astigmatism was through hard contacts or glasses. Astigmatism couldn’t be corrected with soft ones.
The way it’s done now is the cloudy insides are taken out, and the front “skin” of the capsule. The back “skin” is left for retinal stability.  Since the back of the lens is left in, sometimes, after surgery, it gets cloudy a few years later. Sometimes called a secondary cataract. Extremely easily fixed by burning a hole through it with a laser. No pain, no trouble, not much more trouble than an ordinary eye exam when your eyes are dilated. My other sister had it done on one eye.

John, if any of the information I’ve imparted helps you firm up questions, that's good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.