Alamy

Alamy Image Manager - want a sneak peek?

Recommended Posts

Matt Limb    80

It all looks good and sounds good; but like some many new systems there will be teething problems - remember a well known PC operating system is said to often release an update as the final Beta Testing process!

 

So what if we find a hitch?  Can we run old and new in parallel for a period of time?  Or is the slow release going to be selective so that they are the final beta testers?

 

Either way once fully deployed and fully functional I feel sure we will all benefit, well done Alamy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NYCat    889

I would like to see Alamy giving a search advantage to those images that have been keyworded with 50 tags to motivate people to review their images. Those who were able to reduce to 30 keywords would receive a even bigger benefit.

 

Not only would that recognize the efforts of those who try not to spam, but punish those who use a horde of irrelevant keywords. In fact, my experience tells me that 30 keywords are more than enough. Looking at alamy measures and other agencies that identify the keywords used by buyers show that almost all searches use a couple words and are pretty direct on what they want.

 

One of the agencies that has been recently purchased by a software giant we all know started doing this and I could only see advantages. They accept 50 keywords but value more the images with just 30 and give a higher value to the first seven.

 

I don't wish for this. Wildlife images can take a lot of keywords and I have had sales when some of my detailed keywords were overlooked by other photographers.

 

Paulette 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marianne    244

Looks good though thinking I'll probably have to go back to old ones if things like New York City end up as separate tags. I like the idea of "supertags" and it will finally put to rest the old do we use [ ] or "" to get them to work. 

 

Still, a welcome change - it should make keywording easier and better, IMHO. Also glad about the editorial RF. Being in the US, it's been hard deciding if my work should go to a US-based site that only permits RF or Alamy which only permits RM so this is a change that I'm happy about. I've had work split between the two and it will be nice to just upload to both. 

 

Thanks Alamy. Will we get an email when the new system is ready?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Betty LaRue    1,053

 

 

I don't wish for this. Wildlife images can take a lot of keywords and I have had sales when some of my detailed keywords were overlooked by other photographers.

 

Paulette

 

I hope with a bit of study you can figure out how to stay where you want to be in the searches, Paulette. Maybe there is a way. I'm a bit apprehensive, too. My images come up high in searches. Not sure how it will be in the future.

But I am excited about the other changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

 

I would like to see Alamy giving a search advantage to those images that have been keyworded with 50 tags to motivate people to review their images. Those who were able to reduce to 30 keywords would receive a even bigger benefit.

 

Not only would that recognize the efforts of those who try not to spam, but punish those who use a horde of irrelevant keywords. In fact, my experience tells me that 30 keywords are more than enough. Looking at alamy measures and other agencies that identify the keywords used by buyers show that almost all searches use a couple words and are pretty direct on what they want.

 

One of the agencies that has been recently purchased by a software giant we all know started doing this and I could only see advantages. They accept 50 keywords but value more the images with just 30 and give a higher value to the first seven.

 

I don't wish for this. Wildlife images can take a lot of keywords and I have had sales when some of my detailed keywords were overlooked by other photographers.

 

Paulette 

 

 

I agree with you on this Paulette. Some of my views come from searches using less likely keywords that the majority don't take the time to either think of or research. I don't use the rarer terms in Essentials, and sometimes not even the Main box, but in Comprehensive so at least my images appear in the results. There's a difference between keyword spamming and using accurate but less obvious keywords. I'm very against keyword spamming, but thankfully the ranking system at Alamy deals with those contributors well, as their rank decreases over time.

 

Geoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ed Rooney    1,300

 

I would like to see Alamy giving a search advantage to those images that have been keyworded with 50 tags to motivate people to review their images. Those who were able to reduce to 30 keywords would receive a even bigger benefit.

 

Not only would that recognize the efforts of those who try not to spam, but punish those who use a horde of irrelevant keywords. In fact, my experience tells me that 30 keywords are more than enough. Looking at alamy measures and other agencies that identify the keywords used by buyers show that almost all searches use a couple words and are pretty direct on what they want.

 

One of the agencies that has been recently purchased by a software giant we all know started doing this and I could only see advantages. They accept 50 keywords but value more the images with just 30 and give a higher value to the first seven.

 

I don't wish for this. Wildlife images can take a lot of keywords and I have had sales when some of my detailed keywords were overlooked by other photographers.

 

Paulette 

 

 

 

You have sales because of your wonderful decisive moments, Paulette.

 

I'm wondering: should I move forward and submit as usual, or should I hang back for a few days, a week, till the new tools show up?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inchiquin    495

One thing that it sounds like will change, which is what I've been worried about, is that adding duplicate words to the Main and Comprehensive fields will no longer improve image placement. It is one of the "tricks" that I don't think is widely known about, and I haven't seen discussed previously. Let's say I have an image of Leeds Castle and I put Leeds Castle in the caption and essentials boxes. If I was to check the position in the search results and note it, then add Leeds Castle to the main section, the next day my image would be higher up in the results. If I was then to add Leeds Castle to the Comprehensive box too, it's position would rise up again. I have proven this many times with different images and it definitely makes a difference, and is one of the things that gave some of us an edge over our competition who weren't so familiar with the system and hadn't done this testing for themselves.

 

 

It's always been my belief that Alamy frowned on this.

 

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

 

One thing that it sounds like will change, which is what I've been worried about, is that adding duplicate words to the Main and Comprehensive fields will no longer improve image placement. It is one of the "tricks" that I don't think is widely known about, and I haven't seen discussed previously. Let's say I have an image of Leeds Castle and I put Leeds Castle in the caption and essentials boxes. If I was to check the position in the search results and note it, then add Leeds Castle to the main section, the next day my image would be higher up in the results. If I was then to add Leeds Castle to the Comprehensive box too, it's position would rise up again. I have proven this many times with different images and it definitely makes a difference, and is one of the things that gave some of us an edge over our competition who weren't so familiar with the system and hadn't done this testing for themselves.

 

 

It's always been my belief that Alamy frowned on this.

 

Alan

 

 

I wasn't aware of that Alan. If I'd known, I wouldn't have done it. I simply did lots of testing and found that duplicating the main search words in all fields helped, so that's what I now do. If I'd known that such an advantage was frowned upon by Alamy, then I would have stopped doing it, but of course that advantage will be taken away now with the new system anyway. One way of looking at it would be that those who keyword spam and use RF incorrectly to get higher in the results are left to get away with it even when they're reported, so we need to grab any advantage we can.

 

On another subject, I'm thinking that we'll all have to go through our keywords for all our images again and organise the tags that we intended as phrases, into single tags. At least we'll all be in the same boat with that, so nobody will have any real advantage. Would, as in Alamy's example, a tag of "new york city" mean that a search of exactly that would show your image up higher than if you had a separate tag for each word? So if you don't add them all to one tag for existing images, would it make a difference to the results? Just one of many questions I'm wondering about, which nobody but Alamy will know the answer to yet.  :)   I assume that the main difference would be that searches for something like "new city" wouldn't include an image with a tag of "new york city".

 

Geoff.

Edited by GS-Images

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chris24    240

 Jeff Greenberg mentioned  /Preserving tags devoted to UK-US words, would "humor humour" tag be returned with "humor" AND "humour" searches?

The same question could be asked of plurals.  ie. "car cars"  or "car"   "cars"

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Jeff Greenberg mentioned  /Preserving tags devoted to UK-US words, would "humor humour" tag be returned with "humor" AND "humour" searches?

The same question could be asked of plurals.  ie. "car cars"  or "car"   "cars"

 

Stemming, UK/US variations and singulars/plurals is very much of interest. I can't see anything about this in the announcement and given the limit of 50 keywords it might become very important i.e.imagining a buyer searching for "females eating oranges" which often could mean that they are actually looking for perhaps a (one) female adult eating an orange + something specific. My dreamed up image would normally be keyworded as follows;

 

woman, women, female, females, adult, adults, caucasian, caucasians, one, only, person, persons, people, 20s, twentys, twenties, mid-20s, late 20s, 20-25, 20-24, 25-30, 24-29, young, orange, oranges, fruit, fruits, eats, eating, bite, bites, biting, into, enjoy, enjoys, enjoying, healthy, snack, snacks, piece, pieces, peeled, sitting, sits, sat, relaxing, enjoys, enjoying - 48 keywords just to cover the basics of the person, main object and activity in the image. 

 

attractive, beautiful, long hair, brunette, brunettes, brown hair, northern european, scandinavian, swedish, red, skirt, skirts, black, blouse, blouses, shirt, shirts, real people, inside, indoor, indoors, alone, living room, drawing room, sitting room, front room, at home, couch, couches, sofa, sofas, Sweden, Scandinavia, Nordic country, European, selective focus, focus on foreground, vertical - another 38 to add a bit more detail and "edge" for a total of 86 keywords/tags...

 

and that's just a first run quick example probably missing out a whole bunch, leaving out phrases/topical keywords such as "healthy eating", "healthy diet", "healthy diets", "trendy diet", "trendy diets", "fruit diet", "fruit diets", fruitarian diet", "fruitarian diets" - another 9 keywords/tags, which would bring the total to 95 keywords/tags.

 

I guess I'm going to have to become frugal when it comes to keywording, always try to only add what has relevance at the same time covering all bases when it comes to buyer's weird and wonderful variations of searches, but starting to feel like a bad spammer instead! I know some people even keyword for common spelling mistakes 

Edited by Martin Carlsson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

 

 Jeff Greenberg mentioned  /Preserving tags devoted to UK-US words, would "humor humour" tag be returned with "humor" AND "humour" searches?

The same question could be asked of plurals.  ie. "car cars"  or "car"   "cars"

 

Stemming, UK/US variations and singulars/plurals is very much of interest. I can't see anything about this in the announcement and given the limit of 50 keywords it might become very important i.e.imagining a buyer searching for "females eating oranges" which often could mean that they are actually looking for perhaps a (one) female adult eating an orange + something specific. My dreamed up image would normally be keyworded as follows;

 

woman, women, female, females, adult, adults, caucasian, caucasians, one, only, person, persons, people, 20s, twentys, twenties, mid-20s, late 20s, 20-25, 20-24, 25-30, 24-29, young, orange, oranges, fruit, fruits, eats, eating, bite, bites, biting, into, enjoy, enjoys, enjoying, healthy, snack, snacks, piece, pieces, peeled, sitting, sits, sat, relaxing, enjoys, enjoying - 48 keywords just to cover the basics of the person, main object and activity in the image. 

 

attractive, beautiful, long hair, brunette, brunettes, brown hair, northern european, scandinavian, swedish, red, skirt, skirts, black, blouse, blouses, shirt, shirts, real people, inside, indoor, indoors, alone, living room, drawing room, sitting room, front room, at home, couch, couches, sofa, sofas, Sweden, Scandinavia, Nordic country, European, selective focus, focus on foreground, vertical - another 38 to add a bit more detail and "edge" for a total of 86 keywords/tags...

 

and that's just a first run quick example probably missing out a whole bunch, leaving out phrases/topical keywords such as "healthy eating", "healthy diet", "healthy diets", "trendy diet", "trendy diets", "fruit diet", "fruit diets", fruitarian diet", "fruitarian diets" - another 9 keywords/tags, which would bring the total to 95 keywords/tags.

 

I guess I'm going to have to become frugal when it comes to keywording, always try to only add what has relevance at the same time covering all bases when it comes to buyer's weird and wonderful variations of searches, but starting to feel like a bad spammer instead! I know some people even keyword for common spelling mistakes 

 

 

In my opinion, using all those keywords/tags for an image of someone eating an orange is rather spammy - No offence intended.  :)   You cannot be all things with every image. If the caption field is still going to be searchable, then that's a good place for putting some details like the specific age of the woman and maybe some other details that are fairly irrelevant. So something like, "Woman in her 20s eating an orange while sitting by the sea on a cold day".

 

It's quite unlikely any client who wants an image of someone eating an orange would care about where they were eating it, but some details of location in the caption (such as being by the sea) covers that just in case, and if things work as they do at the moment, it'll be searchable but carry less weight than a tag.

 

Details describing how the woman is dressed, what type of hair she has, what country she's in and other similar things are completely irrelevant for such an image. Put yourself in the mind of someone wanting to find an image of a female eating an orange. Would their hair colour be a concern? Someone younger maybe, yes, maybe one tag for "young woman" would be fine to cover that.

 

Reserve less relevant words for images that concentrate on those things. So for hair colour, have an image of a girl waving her hair around. Tags such as "healthy living", "healthy living concept" and "eating healthily" would be good tags for your example, as they are specific to an image of someone eating fruit.

 

As for UK/USA spellings and plurals - I don't want Alamy's system to automatically use them and I doubt it will. It's part of the skill of keywording well and having an advantage over others. Also their system would have to be able to determine if a word without or with an "s" at the end would also be a real word that means the same thing if it removes or adds an "s". Also, sometimes I have similar images where I use plurals in one and singular words in the other, to help with CTR by restricting views. The more automation of keywords/tags, the less we'll be able to tailor our images to appear as we went, and keep tight control over excessive views.

 

Geoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
funkyworm    635

 

 

 Jeff Greenberg mentioned  /Preserving tags devoted to UK-US words, would "humor humour" tag be returned with "humor" AND "humour" searches?

The same question could be asked of plurals.  ie. "car cars"  or "car"   "cars"

 

Stemming, UK/US variations and singulars/plurals is very much of interest. I can't see anything about this in the announcement and given the limit of 50 keywords it might become very important i.e.imagining a buyer searching for "females eating oranges" which often could mean that they are actually looking for perhaps a (one) female adult eating an orange + something specific. My dreamed up image would normally be keyworded as follows;

 

woman, women, female, females, adult, adults, caucasian, caucasians, one, only, person, persons, people, 20s, twentys, twenties, mid-20s, late 20s, 20-25, 20-24, 25-30, 24-29, young, orange, oranges, fruit, fruits, eats, eating, bite, bites, biting, into, enjoy, enjoys, enjoying, healthy, snack, snacks, piece, pieces, peeled, sitting, sits, sat, relaxing, enjoys, enjoying - 48 keywords just to cover the basics of the person, main object and activity in the image. 

 

attractive, beautiful, long hair, brunette, brunettes, brown hair, northern european, scandinavian, swedish, red, skirt, skirts, black, blouse, blouses, shirt, shirts, real people, inside, indoor, indoors, alone, living room, drawing room, sitting room, front room, at home, couch, couches, sofa, sofas, Sweden, Scandinavia, Nordic country, European, selective focus, focus on foreground, vertical - another 38 to add a bit more detail and "edge" for a total of 86 keywords/tags...

 

and that's just a first run quick example probably missing out a whole bunch, leaving out phrases/topical keywords such as "healthy eating", "healthy diet", "healthy diets", "trendy diet", "trendy diets", "fruit diet", "fruit diets", fruitarian diet", "fruitarian diets" - another 9 keywords/tags, which would bring the total to 95 keywords/tags.

 

I guess I'm going to have to become frugal when it comes to keywording, always try to only add what has relevance at the same time covering all bases when it comes to buyer's weird and wonderful variations of searches, but starting to feel like a bad spammer instead! I know some people even keyword for common spelling mistakes 

 

 

In my opinion, using all those keywords/tags for an image of someone eating an orange is rather spammy - No offence intended.  :)   You cannot be all things with every image. If the caption field is still going to be searchable, then that's a good place for putting some details like the specific age of the woman and maybe some other details that are fairly irrelevant. So something like, "Woman in her 20s eating an orange while sitting by the sea on a cold day".

 

It's quite unlikely any client who wants an image of someone eating an orange would care about where they were eating it, but some details of location in the caption (such as being by the sea) covers that just in case, and if things work as they do at the moment, it'll be searchable but carry less weight than a tag.

 

Details describing how the woman is dressed, what type of hair she has, what country she's in and other similar things are completely irrelevant for such an image. Put yourself in the mind of someone wanting to find an image of a female eating an orange. Would their hair colour be a concern? Someone younger maybe, yes, maybe one tag for "young woman" would be fine to cover that.

 

Reserve less relevant words for images that concentrate on those things. So for hair colour, have an image of a girl waving her hair around. Tags such as "healthy living", "healthy living concept" and "eating healthily" would be good tags for your example, as they are specific to an image of someone eating fruit.

 

As for UK/USA spellings and plurals - I don't want Alamy's system to automatically use them and I doubt it will. It's part of the skill of keywording well and having an advantage over others. Also their system would have to be able to determine if a word without or with an "s" at the end would also be a real word that means the same thing if it removes or adds an "s". Also, sometimes I have similar images where I use plurals in one and singular words in the other, to help with CTR by restricting views. The more automation of keywords/tags, the less we'll be able to tailor our images to appear as we went, and keep tight control over excessive views.

 

Geoff.

 

 

Ermmm... I would say much of those words are very pertinent. (Without trying to be disagreeable)

 

Standard questions from casting agents are hair length, style and colour, eye colour, skin colour, height, ethnicity etc. They are trying to fit the person they want to the product they are selling. Stock for commercial usage is the same. I have just returned from the Far East, if they want an image to sell oranges to the local market they may want to reflect that market in which case they dont want blonde's. Or they may want for example to promote the Californian origins of the product, in which case they do want a blonde.

All of my MR'd images which have been keyworded by the big G include these details.

Edited by funkyworm
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

 

Ermmm... I would say much of those words are very pertinent. (Without trying to be disagreeable)

 

Standard questions from casting agents are hair length, style and colour, eye colour, skin colour, height, ethnicity etc. They are trying to fit the person they want to the product they are selling. Stock for commercial usage is the same. I have just returned from the Far East, if they want an image to sell oranges to the local market they may want to reflect that market in which case they dont want blonde's. Or they may want for example to promote the Californian origins of the product, in which case they do want a blonde.

All of my MR'd images which have been keyworded by the big G include these details.

 

 

 

I take your point, but I would have thought that the times such words would be searched for would be so small, that the extra views one may get on those images would outweigh any benefit. Looking at AoA, the huge majority of searches are very specific and just one or two words. I'd think that any client wanting such specifics as eye and hair colour would most likely be ones who would use their own model.

 

I'm no expert in that field at all anyway, it's just my own opinion based on my own personal experience. I think that if someone is going to use tags in that way, where do you draw the line? You could specify the weather, what sort of watch they're wearing, how long their nails are, etc.. Whatever works for someone though is of course the best for them.

 

Geoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pearl    694

 

 

I would like to see Alamy giving a search advantage to those images that have been keyworded with 50 tags to motivate people to review their images. Those who were able to reduce to 30 keywords would receive a even bigger benefit.

 

Not only would that recognize the efforts of those who try not to spam, but punish those who use a horde of irrelevant keywords. In fact, my experience tells me that 30 keywords are more than enough. Looking at alamy measures and other agencies that identify the keywords used by buyers show that almost all searches use a couple words and are pretty direct on what they want.

 

One of the agencies that has been recently purchased by a software giant we all know started doing this and I could only see advantages. They accept 50 keywords but value more the images with just 30 and give a higher value to the first seven.

 

I don't wish for this. Wildlife images can take a lot of keywords and I have had sales when some of my detailed keywords were overlooked by other photographers.

 

Paulette 

 

 

I agree with you on this Paulette. Some of my views come from searches using less likely keywords that the majority don't take the time to either think of or research. I don't use the rarer terms in Essentials, and sometimes not even the Main box, but in Comprehensive so at least my images appear in the results. There's a difference between keyword spamming and using accurate but less obvious keywords. I'm very against keyword spamming, but thankfully the ranking system at Alamy deals with those contributors well, as their rank decreases over time.

 

Geoff.

 

 

+1

 

My experience and sentiments entirely.  Especially as we have to use singular and plural versions of many tags

 

Pearl

Edited by Pearl
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
arterra    3,757

Do I or do I not have to review ALL my 42,700 images because I keyword in Bridge, so my keywords appear on Alamy WITHOUT commas. Am I now put at a disadvantage because my keywords / tags show as Eurasian beaver European beaver beavers Castor fiber .....(7 tags) instead of Eurasian beaver, European beaver, beaver, beavers, Castor fiber, ...... (only 5!!! tags)   ?  

Will my "European beaver" images appear further down the line in search results because those images - which show tags with commas - have priority? I sure hope not! :mellow:

Cheers,
Philippe

Edited by arterra
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 Jeff Greenberg mentioned  /Preserving tags devoted to UK-US words, would "humor humour" tag be returned with "humor" AND "humour" searches?

The same question could be asked of plurals.  ie. "car cars"  or "car"   "cars"

 

Stemming, UK/US variations and singulars/plurals is very much of interest. I can't see anything about this in the announcement and given the limit of 50 keywords it might become very important i.e.imagining a buyer searching for "females eating oranges" which often could mean that they are actually looking for perhaps a (one) female adult eating an orange + something specific. My dreamed up image would normally be keyworded as follows;

 

woman, women, female, females, adult, adults, caucasian, caucasians, one, only, person, persons, people, 20s, twentys, twenties, mid-20s, late 20s, 20-25, 20-24, 25-30, 24-29, young, orange, oranges, fruit, fruits, eats, eating, bite, bites, biting, into, enjoy, enjoys, enjoying, healthy, snack, snacks, piece, pieces, peeled, sitting, sits, sat, relaxing, enjoys, enjoying - 48 keywords just to cover the basics of the person, main object and activity in the image. 

 

attractive, beautiful, long hair, brunette, brunettes, brown hair, northern european, scandinavian, swedish, red, skirt, skirts, black, blouse, blouses, shirt, shirts, real people, inside, indoor, indoors, alone, living room, drawing room, sitting room, front room, at home, couch, couches, sofa, sofas, Sweden, Scandinavia, Nordic country, European, selective focus, focus on foreground, vertical - another 38 to add a bit more detail and "edge" for a total of 86 keywords/tags...

 

and that's just a first run quick example probably missing out a whole bunch, leaving out phrases/topical keywords such as "healthy eating", "healthy diet", "healthy diets", "trendy diet", "trendy diets", "fruit diet", "fruit diets", fruitarian diet", "fruitarian diets" - another 9 keywords/tags, which would bring the total to 95 keywords/tags.

 

I guess I'm going to have to become frugal when it comes to keywording, always try to only add what has relevance at the same time covering all bases when it comes to buyer's weird and wonderful variations of searches, but starting to feel like a bad spammer instead! I know some people even keyword for common spelling mistakes 

 

 

In my opinion, using all those keywords/tags for an image of someone eating an orange is rather spammy - No offence intended.  :)   You cannot be all things with every image. If the caption field is still going to be searchable, then that's a good place for putting some details like the specific age of the woman and maybe some other details that are fairly irrelevant. So something like, "Woman in her 20s eating an orange while sitting by the sea on a cold day".

 

It's quite unlikely any client who wants an image of someone eating an orange would care about where they were eating it, but some details of location in the caption (such as being by the sea) covers that just in case, and if things work as they do at the moment, it'll be searchable but carry less weight than a tag.

 

Details describing how the woman is dressed, what type of hair she has, what country she's in and other similar things are completely irrelevant for such an image. Put yourself in the mind of someone wanting to find an image of a female eating an orange. Would their hair colour be a concern? Someone younger maybe, yes, maybe one tag for "young woman" would be fine to cover that.

 

Reserve less relevant words for images that concentrate on those things. So for hair colour, have an image of a girl waving her hair around. Tags such as "healthy living", "healthy living concept" and "eating healthily" would be good tags for your example, as they are specific to an image of someone eating fruit.

 

As for UK/USA spellings and plurals - I don't want Alamy's system to automatically use them and I doubt it will. It's part of the skill of keywording well and having an advantage over others. Also their system would have to be able to determine if a word without or with an "s" at the end would also be a real word that means the same thing if it removes or adds an "s". Also, sometimes I have similar images where I use plurals in one and singular words in the other, to help with CTR by restricting views. The more automation of keywords/tags, the less we'll be able to tailor our images to appear as we went, and keep tight control over excessive views.

 

Geoff.

 

 

No offence taken. Spam to me is something that is irrelevant - none in the example are (I think).

 

With the current system it is easy to add a lot of very detailed keywords in the comprehensive section to cover those searches that are very detailed. My current approach was to use the comprehensive field extensively and very sparingly the main and essential field - have worked just fine.

 

With the new system a new approach will have to be taken and obviously one has to scale back on the number of keywords. Is this a good thing? I don't know - the number of images in the database is massive so vague searches (1-3 words) result in a huge number of images coming back.

 

Always been of the school that comprehensive, detailed but relevant keywording is the way to go - covers all scenarios. Try to understand me, I'm not advocating spamming, but the looks/age/ethnic origin/location (it is often quite easy for example to see if an image is shot in a Scandinavian home, a British home or an US home) of an image is relevant, especially in lifestyle, not just any person eating an orange in any old dig will do (in my humble opinion).

Edited by Martin Carlsson
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

Do I or do I not have to review ALL my 42,700 images because I keyword in Bridge, so my keywords appear on Alamy WITHOUT commas. Am I now put at a disadvantage because my keywords / tags show as Eurasian beaver European beaver beavers Castor fiber ..... instead of Eurasian beaver, European beaver, beaver, beavers, Castor fiber, ...... 

 

Will my "European beaver" images appear further down the line in search results because those images - which show tags with commas - have priority? I sure hope not!  :mellow:

 

Cheers,

Philippe

 

Exactly my worry too Philippe. I'm pretty sure I know the answer, and I feel for those like yourself with huge portfolios. It's bad enough for me with my relatively tiny number of images. I don't use commas because we've been told not to, and don't use quotes or square brackets because they caused problems before. I re-did a lot of my keywording because of those issues, so now will I have to go back yet again to re-do them all? I think so. Like I've said already though, everyone is in the same boat, and most won't bother changing things so I hope those who do, get some advantage back.

 

Geoff.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Richard Baker    114

Thinking about this overnight, I'll be interested to see how my meta software (iView) but otherwise Lightroom, exports words into tags into IM. I generally don't overload with keywords but I'll have to be careful not to exceed the 50 tags because the best word I think of at the end will, I presume drop off in IM. Someone has probably already created a Lightroom add-on to count the number of words/tags before Export.

 

But that's the kind of thing we can test individually when it's up and running.

 

Richard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
arterra    3,757

 

Do I or do I not have to review ALL my 42,700 images because I keyword in Bridge, so my keywords appear on Alamy WITHOUT commas. Am I now put at a disadvantage because my keywords / tags show as Eurasian beaver European beaver beavers Castor fiber ..... instead of Eurasian beaver, European beaver, beaver, beavers, Castor fiber, ......

 

Will my "European beaver" images appear further down the line in search results because those images - which show tags with commas - have priority? I sure hope not! :mellow:

 

Cheers,

Philippe

Exactly my worry too Philippe. I'm pretty sure I know the answer, and I feel for those like yourself with huge portfolios. It's bad enough for me with my relatively tiny number of images. I don't use commas because we've been told not to, and don't use quotes or square brackets because they caused problems before. I re-did a lot of my keywording because of those issues, so now will I have to go back yet again to re-do them all? I think so. Like I've said already though, everyone is in the same boat, and most won't bother changing things so I hope those who do, get some advantage back.

 

Geoff.

 

 

 

 

From the blog: "For any new images the 50 tag cap will be in place. Phrases such as “New York City” can be added as a single tag, so you wouldn’t have to use 3 tags up for “New”, “York” and “City”. Out of these tags, you can choose to make 10 of them ‘supertags’. These give those tags extra weighting and therefore a higher priority in the search engine. For those images already online, the essential keywords will be transferred over to be supertags"

 

So, my "Castor fiber" will NOT be a supertag (already in essential keywords). Instead it will be "Castor" and "fiber" :angry:

Another disadvantage is that ALL my keywords will be tags, while contributors who use commas will be able to add a whole lot more tags since "Castor fiber" will count as ONE tag for those (for me, it'll count as TWO tags :angry:). And don't get me started on all those french place names: Nord Pas de Calais (4 tags for me instead of 1 :angry:) / Mont Saint Michel (3 tags for me instead of 1 :angry:) / Bay of the Somme (4 tags for me instead of 1 :angry:) And how about "national park", "nature reserve", "global warming", "pine marten", "Scots pine", "three-masted sailing ship"? My 50 tags limit will be quickly filled this way  :angry: 

 

Can't say I'm very pleased with that. Weren't we adviced in the past NOT to use commas because they take up the space of valuable characters ......??????

 

Cheers,

Philippe

Edited by arterra
  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GS-Images    1,183

From the blog: "For any new images the 50 tag cap will be in place. Phrases such as “New York City” can be added as a single tag, so you wouldn’t have to use 3 tags up for “New”, “York” and “City”. Out of these tags, you can choose to make 10 of them ‘supertags’. These give those tags extra weighting and therefore a higher priority in the search engine. For those images already online, the essential keywords will be transferred over to be supertags"

 

So, my "European bever" will NOT be a supertag (already in essential keywords). Instead it will be "European" and "beaver:angry: 

Another disadvantage is that ALL my keywords will be tags while those who use commas will be able to add a whole lot more words since "European bever" will count as ONE tag for those.

Can't say I'm very pleased with that.

 

Cheers,

Philippe

 

 

Will one tag of "European beaver" give a higher position in results than a tag of "European" and another of "beaver"? That's one of the big questions I have.

 

We've always been told not to use commas. Some still do, but we've been told we don't need to use them. So it will be very annoying IF it's now shown that the use of commas has actually given those people an advantage, IF their words without commas are now going to be supertags.

 

A lack of clarity and CORRECT information on this in the past is coming back to bite us all in the butt.

 

Geoff.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Niels Quist    406

Always been of the school that comprehensive, detailed but relevant keywording is the way to go - covers all scenarios. Try to understand me, I'm not advocating spamming, but the looks/age/ethnic origin/location (it is often quite easy for example to see if an image is shot in a Scandinavian home, a British home or an US home) of an image is relevant, especially in lifestyle, not just any person eating an orange in any old dig will do (in my humble opinion).

 

 

Quite agree with this - and the 50 keywords will surely be on the low side for me, as well.

 

Edited: some bad grammar

Edited by Niels Quist
  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pearl    694

I'd like to know if the words within a phrase e.g. "Snowdonia National Park" will be searchable or will I also have to add Snowdonia?  I will find 50 tags very limiting and feel it could lead to more frustration for buyers if they can't drill down to very specific needs.

 

Some good feelings about this change but not all good by any means. The goal posts keep changing it seems.

 

Pearl

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
arterra    3,757

I'd like to know if the words within a phrase e.g. "Snowdonia National Park" will be searchable or will I also have to add Snowdonia? I will find 50 tags very limiting and feel it could lead to more frustration for buyers if they can't drill down to very specific needs.

 

Some good feelings about this change but not all good by any means. The goal posts keep changing it seems.

 

Pearl

It's good news for those who start from scratch. Personally, I feel I'm screwed :unsure: Will take me MONTHS to review my keywords.

And I suppose I won't be able to use Bridge anymore to keyword? I added commas from the beginning in Bridge, but they show in Image Manager WITHOUT commas. Can it be fixed so that images keyworded in Bridge will keep the added commas?

 

Cheers,

Philippe

Edited by arterra
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now