ReeRay

OK here on Firefox

Good $$ Country: Worldwide Usage: Magazine, editorial print and digital use, up to DPS, repeat use within a single issue Industry sector: Media, design & publishing

Totally agree

Usage: Student Projects ; Industry Sector: Education ; US sale Less than a dollar - unbelievable !

Looks like a 1950's MG TF

Betty I'm no "Techie" but I wonder if this helps:- https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=imac+startup+programmes&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ8c_H7J3iAhUEg-YKHeG6AVYQBQgrKAA&biw=2175&bih=1259

There's no "suggestion", it's fact. And there's no "allegedly" about it either, it's there for all to see. Announced 48 hours prior to any official Alamy announcement. Make what you like about it. I have my suspicions what's going on behind the scenes, particularly in light of said members failure to respond to the question previously to put him

Currently I have only 25% of both sales and revenue compared to the same 4 month period of last year despite uploading a lot more images. Fees are particularly low. Last sale netted me $1 only. This is unacceptable and I'm now reviewing my decision of going exclusive at such a poor performing outlet. I most definitely have lost the incentive to upload anymore.

Actually on the "other forum" you did give 48 hours prior warning that this was about to happen. I'm intrigued -how come you were aware so early? And why not post here and alert your fellow live news contributors?

No, simply because I already had primes of 28mm, 55mm and 85mm before the Tamron lens was announced.

You may wish to take a look at this lens https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1393332-REG/tamron_a036_28_75mm_f_2_8_di_iii.html It gets great reviews -

see here

Dreadful. Last year February was BME for income and sales, this year is the worst in living memory!

First upload the amended image and pass QC. Then contact contributors@alamy.com and tell them to delete the original and provide them with the Alamy ref. numbers for both, i.e. "i would like ref no 1234 removed as I have replaced it with ref no 5678"

@Chris Burrows Here you go