Pietrach Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Quick question. Do you notice any difference in which sales better? Do newspapers/publishers prefer one over another? Is landscape with dead space better than portrait with subject filling whole frame? ...ok, three questions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Bell Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 The answer to this question is going to depend on whether a photographer shoots a fairly even mix of landscape and portrait orientated images. If he/she shoots mainly portrait then they will say "Portrait" and visa versa. Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Robinson Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Looking at my sales for the last three months, a clear majority are landscape. I am pretty sure, however, that a clear majority of my images are taken in landscape format, so that's probably to be expected. I tend to take portraits in 'landscape' format anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Normspics Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Forty percent of my last year sales were portrait. I do make a conscious effort to shoot every subject landscape and portrait, but they don’t always both make the cut technically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisken Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Sometimes, I'll do both, depending on subject. Not sold many, but there have been portrait sales mixed with the landscape ones. Krisken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSnapper Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 bear in mind that when a paper or magazine is laying out a story for print, the space left for the stock image is often determinded by the overall shape of the page and the rest of the content. . If what you have is the wrong proportions, it reduces the chances of being used. For these sort of stories, the text comes first and the image is chosen to fit the space, rather than the space being determined by the image... Rule of thumb; shoot portrait/landscape/oblique/detail and you're pretty much covered km Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Bell Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Found a bit of time and checked my portrait sales against my landscape sales. Last year it was 28% port of total sales for year. Total since started selling on Alamy 18% port of total sales. Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pietrach Posted January 14, 2018 Author Share Posted January 14, 2018 Thank you all for your replies. This helps a lot. I will try more to shoot bot versions of each subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Brooks Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 I always try to do a quick flip of the camera and get both a portrait and landscape shot, as in this case. However sometimes it is not possible because of subject movement, or I am just lazy, so I will crop a portrait image out of a 50 megapixel landscape as here. The 50 megapixel landscape here: The 22 megapixel portrait crop from the 50 megapixel landscape here. I did flip the camera to portrait mode after shooting the landscape version but the resulting placement of the canoes was weak, so I deleted the in camera portrait shots. Recently I went through my 50 megapixel landscapes, that were not shot as portrait, and cropped some of them to 20 megapixel portraits. You can see the cropped landscapes on the first page of my portfolio if you go there. I think it is a worthwhile exercise because a buyer quickly looking at several hundred images for a portrait format may not readily see the portrait within the landscape. http://www.alamy.com/search/imageresults.aspx?&xstx=0&userid={F0453AA0-D41A-421F-B4D6-F125791B632D}&name=bill-brooks&st=12 This solution requires a high resolution camera and probably RF designation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Olsen Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 I always try to do both but one thing I noticed is in a standard search the portrait thumbnails seem tiny next to the landscape thumbnails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 My sales are about 3:1 landscape. Collection, only about 60:40, which surprised me. Too many portraits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marianne Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 About 10% of my sales have been portrait in the past few years - and about 5% were square photos. I noticed that while I make an effort to shoot both portrait and landscape, especially as I started out shooting for local magazines and newspapers back when portrait orientation images sold more often (horizontal seems to be the preference on the web), I have not uploaded as many as I thought. I'm not sure why. I tend to crop a lot of portrait orientation images square, because they show up better as thumbnails, and that may be why. I should probably upload the horizontal, square and portrait versions. I'm not sure the percentage of portrait images in my portfolio, but a quick look through confirms that it is more than 10%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Estall Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 There are exceptions, but almost all cameras have been built to fit the hand in landscape mode. The various square format cameras avoided the problem which likely explains their professional success years ago. The only camera I ever had which was set to naturally take portrait mode was a little 4.5 x 6 cm Fuji film camera. Of course it's a good idea to offer both options but we have to push ourselves to do it. Tall buildings or things with spires naturally require the portrait orientation as a general rule. There was a time when the way Alamy showed thumbnails the square format presented as much bigger, but that didn't last too long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Morrison Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 For landscape/location pix in portrait format, it's a good idea to leave 25%-35% of the pic area 'empty' at the top (preferably blue sky), which might make them suitable for use as magazine covers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 When the Daily Mail was using umpteen Alamy photos and I took upon the none too pleasant task of searching through their pages for images they had a decided preference for landscape. I generally try to shoot both and tried to cover some of their favourite topics, but almost inevitably my DM sales were landscape. However that was shooting for peanuts, and, as others have said, portrait would be the natural choice for a magazine cover. Do both wherever possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertSnapper Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 Shoot both formats (plus variations) if you can/if it works. I'm still puzzled by customer behaviour though... A recent use in The Times newspaper used my portrait format picture and cropped it to landscape format, which then looked just like the landscape format picture that I had of the same thing ! The landscape version of my pic was used by three other publications, so no idea why the Times did what they did. Also, fill the frame. Then another with space around the subject (for text/cropping). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.