Jon Lewis Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Hi All Seems there has been a re-rank . Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 - not sure I've moved but I do see a lot of different images around me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Richmond Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Nice. Just jumped from mid way up page 21 to bottom of page 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Yes, this one looks like a real (normal) re-rank. My poorest performing pseudo is on the last page, where it belongs, instead of halfway up the field like last time. Maybe the search engine tweaks have been re-adjusted. The last page is moving back further and further - I do wish people that don't understand BHZ wouldn't put hundreds of images up instead of just one per pseudo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Chapman Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Something's definitely changed. I've moved from page 19 to page 6. But the number of images found with "BHZ" in the keywords had also jumped from around 3,000 to over 4,000. That's a bit of a surprise. Surely that many folks haven't started the BHZ game since the last rerank? It'll be interesting to see if my views go back up now. When I was demoted from page 7 to page 23, my views dropped by 40%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Douglas Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I've looked at some of my benchmark searches and some are s lightly up while some are slightly down, so for me it appears to be very little change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Whew! It looks as if I'm still alive and kicking. My main pseudo remains on page one (BHZ search, relevant). Still looking for my secondary one, though. I'm sure it's in there somewhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southpole Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 BHZ up from page 11 to 4 obviously why my daily views are up considerably though no zooms or sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Someone has thrown 1116 images with BHZ in the mix. wim edit: before he/she only had 215 images in bhz ;-) edit 2: There's someone with 20 images as well. With the same initials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissie Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Are they past P3? Because I'm not seeing them? Someone has thrown 1116 images with BHZ in the mix. wim edit: before he/she only had 215 images in bhz ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Are they past P3? Because I'm not seeing them? Someone has thrown 1116 images with BHZ in the mix. wim edit: before he/she only had 215 images in bhz ;-) ;-) Yes if you start looking at around p33 @90, you'll encounter them. Not sure if this is line up is definitive. See the mute swan cygnets problem. wim (still missing some too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissie Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I'm not interested in P33 TBH Are they past P3? Because I'm not seeing them? Someone has thrown 1116 images with BHZ in the mix. wim edit: before he/she only had 215 images in bhz ;-) ;-) Yes if you start looking at around p33 @90, you'll encounter them. Not sure if this is line up is definitive. See the mute swan cygnets problem. wim (still missing some too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I'm not interested in P33 TBH Are they past P3? Because I'm not seeing them? Someone has thrown 1116 images with BHZ in the mix. wim edit: before he/she only had 215 images in bhz ;-) ;-) Yes if you start looking at around p33 @90, you'll encounter them. Not sure if this is line up is definitive. See the mute swan cygnets problem. wim (still missing some too) ouch! wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissie Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 In this game, understandable? ouch! wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vpics Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 LOL, yes, 1116 ... Anyway, best one is middle of page 2. It's remained at the top, I have no idea why as it's not my best selling one. My news pseudo, however, is not doing too well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 The spread of "doesn't get it" images is interesting. Starts on page 21 (120/pg). Trickles up to page 27 where it's a lock, right up to page 34. Nothing on page 35 (the last). Rather than the 50 characters we all get, they only get 46 - Ha Ha. Any way to tell them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 LOL, yes, 1116 ... Just wait - it'll be 3288 pretty soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 In this game, understandable? ouch! wim Oh well, I'm still looking for some of mine. They may have slipped beyond p30. If they turn up safe and sound somewhere nearer to p5 I may join you. If however they have sunk to p48... wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Richmond Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 The spread of "doesn't get it" images is interesting. Starts on page 21 (120/pg). Trickles up to page 27 where it's a lock, right up to page 34. Nothing on page 35 (the last). Rather than the 50 characters we all get, they only get 46 - Ha Ha. Any way to tell them? I doubt they care. Many (all?) of their images are sourced from photos that have been put in the public domain by the original photographers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 The spread of "doesn't get it" images is interesting. Starts on page 21 (120/pg). Trickles up to page 27 where it's a lock, right up to page 34. Nothing on page 35 (the last). Rather than the 50 characters we all get, they only get 46 - Ha Ha. Any way to tell them? I doubt they care. Many (all?) of their images are sourced from photos that have been put in the public domain by the original photographers. Right I just found out the same: Pixabay.com How on earth did this one pass QC? Panasonic DMC-Fz38 - 4000x3000 wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynn Palmer Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I may have slipped an image or two but I'm solidly placed on the same page as before. I can't decide if this is good or bad since there are quite a few more images now. I suppose that means I've moved up in the ranking? Or just fortunate to be slightly ahead of the 1,000+ images by one contributor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vpics Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 So, am I getting this right? These people source images from the internet that are in the Creative Commons domain and the actual photographers have relinquished all their rights - without even realising that someone is making money out of their pics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Richmond Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 So, am I getting this right? These people source images from the internet that are in the Creative Commons domain and the actual photographers have relinquished all their rights - without even realising that someone is making money out of their pics? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vpics Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 And Alamy don't mind selling these pics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Richmond Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 And Alamy don't mind selling these pics? Alamy have been made aware of the situation. 3 months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.