meanderingemu Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 Now that @Alamy has decided this is the wave of the future, we should have clear instructions what actions we should be taking, and how it affects process. I just went through the efforts of identifying my images that qualify for said collections all seem to have following criteria they are Marked with OPTIONAL Info as No Person, No Property (note: i don't have images with released model that i indicated as "without property") So is "Optional" still optional? This seems like a misnomer since the data influences Alamy's feature of the future. But the biggest issue, is that we were told historically to let client decide if the "Physical Property" or "unidentifiable Part of a human" in the image was an issue for Client- so i personally have gone with a large definition that also included unidentifiable, and sometimes marginal, property and people. This now puts me at a disadvantage with someone who went with what i will refer a MS approach to say, "this is not easily identifiable, so i'll mark as No" in order to not get the "Editorial" label. So Alamy can we have clear instructions what we are supposed to be doing in line with the brand new Exciting feature. Thanks Note: to people who load live news, it appears that images these images even if subsequently marked as No, No- happens with Weather and wildlife image, do not qualify for these New Exciting Collections. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now