Brian Yarvin Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 As a long time contributor to Alamy, I just want to take a moment to praise the current QC system. Indeed, I'm astounded at the way it gets images to market quickly. Let the record show that at least one contributor thinks that this aspect of Alamy is working well. I struggle to keep my image quality high enough to pass regularly and I thank the people at Alamy for seeing to it that I keep improving. I'm actually grateful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 As a long time contributor to Alamy, I just want to take a moment to praise the current QC system. Indeed, I'm astounded at the way it gets images to market quickly. Let the record show that at least one contributor thinks that this aspect of Alamy is working well. I struggle to keep my image quality high enough to pass regularly and I thank the people at Alamy for seeing to it that I keep improving. I'm actually grateful. +1 I fortunately rarely have failures but when I have I can see the reasons why. Good Job! Kumar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Yates Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 As a long time contributor to Alamy, I just want to take a moment to praise the current QC system. Indeed, I'm astounded at the way it gets images to market quickly. Let the record show that at least one contributor thinks that this aspect of Alamy is working well. I struggle to keep my image quality high enough to pass regularly and I thank the people at Alamy for seeing to it that I keep improving. I'm actually grateful. +1. I had my first fail for months last Thursday after uploading on Wednesday. I Fixed the offending spot of dust, re submitted the batch straight away and passed QC Saturday morning. Regards Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inchiquin Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 I've been a fan of QC ever since three days after my first failure six years ago (it took me that long to overcome first my anger and then my shame). Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arletta Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 "We Are the Ninety Six Percent" May I ask where did you take this number from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 It was in an Alamy post about QC. I think - but am not quite sure - that it's the percentage of images that pass QC during a given month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin P Wilson Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 As a long time contributor to Alamy, I just want to take a moment to praise the current QC system. Indeed, I'm astounded at the way it gets images to market quickly. Let the record show that at least one contributor thinks that this aspect of Alamy is working well. I struggle to keep my image quality high enough to pass regularly and I thank the people at Alamy for seeing to it that I keep improving. I'm actually grateful. I agree and I feel that Alamy QC requirements are the absolute minimum I should expect of myself if I wish to be considered professional; and if I am licencing my work I should. As a result I take a very hard-nosed view of my technical quality before I even consider the image itself. I don't let my appreciation of an image overrule the decision about the technical quality. As a result I don't faff around with downsizing, sharpening and other devices to "rescue" an image - if it is not technically good enough it does not get considered for submission. I waste less time that way. Now how do I do the same for saleability or the artistic merits? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 Martin, my experience is pretty similar. I find that the Alamy standard is very low compared to either Getty or the publishers I deal with directly. And your points about saleability and creativity are well-taken too - they are both far bigger issues than QC for me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruth Burke Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 What is your opinion for the new offering of full file size downloads for $15.00...what would be the reason for paying more for a rights managed license? Unless there is going to be a large visible distribution, how does Alamy know that download rights are being followed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Wait (haha) until you have to wait a month. Five years of good QC won't help you then. It didn't help me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin P Wilson Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Wait (haha) until you have to wait a month. Five years of good QC won't help you then. It didn't help me. It does concern me that Alamy QC may raise the bar faster than I do but so far, so good. I will worry about it if and when it happens (probably when, I am human after all). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inchiquin Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Wait (haha) until you have to wait a month. Five years of good QC won't help you then. It didn't help me. It wasn't very long ago that you were saying that your record was good enough that the occasional failure didn't put you in the sinbin. My only failure in the last five and a half years went through QC in normal time. Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 Wait (haha) until you have to wait a month. Five years of good QC won't help you then. It didn't help me. Mark: A month isn't all that long in this industry. I often wait many months for submissions to be edited elsewhere and many more months for book proposals to be evaluated. The trick is to always have something in the pipeline somewhere. It evens out in the long run. Brian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 A month might not be but three on the trot is, I don't have any other outlets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 A month might not be but three on the trot is, I don't have any other outlets. Mark: I think this is turning out to be a completely different issue. Being reliant on one agency - or even one market - is pretty frightening to me. Perhaps a separate thread on diversification is in order. To get back on topic though - you'll have a rough time finding another agency or editorial content buyer that moves as fast as Alamy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Sorry but it's not OT to note that the downside of the QC policy is arbitrary lock-outs for long periods. The QC isn't arbitrary, but what 'qualifies' you for the sinbin is. Or at least it looks like it from here when MS won't discuss it. I've been in the business for some time and I am where I am, for whatever reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 Mark, I accept your apology and won't question any decisions you might choose to make - for whatever reason. Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 Not Kansas, but perhaps New Jersey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Hopefully not The Hamptons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Yarvin Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 John, the Hamptons are at the eastern end of Long Island, New York. New Jersey is at least 100 miles away and safe from all the excesses. Here, we have a quiet and serious environment that is conducive to the pursuit of excellence in art, craft and science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Brook Posted September 24, 2014 Share Posted September 24, 2014 Deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.