Jump to content

Realizing the importance of including Latin Names for animals


Recommended Posts

My shots from the zoo finally made it into the search, so I thought I would do some searching to see what else is there. When I typed in "white lion" I got over 6,000 results, but a lot of them were not lions, but pubs by that name, and many other things. When i added Panthera leo krugeri to the search, it dropped down to 97 pictures.  That is telling me a lot of people are not including the latin name in their searches, as I know there are more than 97 photos of white lions.

 

I would think many searchers would use the latin name, simply as a filter to get rid of all the non-lion specific shots.

 

Same with cheetah - it drops from over 16,000 to 9,000. And I realized on my original shots from Africa, I haven't included any of the latin names for the animals, so will be re-keywording all of those.

 

Have you guys noticed specific searches for your photos that have been the latin name only, or the common name plus the latin name?

 

Jill

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always use latin names along with the common names. Latin names are more specific and leave no doubt. How about confusion between the Elk in Europe and the Moose in North America?

 

From Wickipedia

 

"The moose (North America) or Eurasian elk (Europe) (Alces alces) is the largest extant species in the deer family"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snag is, yesterday I got a hit for acipenser sturio, the European sturgeon.

It was on a plate in a restaurant in Bordeaux.

 

Lets hope the search wasn't for Nat Geo then ;-)

 

I'm very strict on latin names for my animal shots. Hard to obviously compare those which I don't see searches for but given I put the common name and latin name I see far more hit for latin names than common, and that might be because that is what people are typing in for search terms above common or that there are less with latin names and I'm therefore further up the pile or in a smaller pool - either way it is goodness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The early settlers to America and indeed other parts of the New World encountered unfamiliar animals and plants, and gave them the names of the creatures back home.  This can cause a great deal of confusion.  The American robin is an example that immediately comes to mind (it is a kind of thrush), also the catch-all term of turtle for turtles (live in the sea), tortoises (on land) and terrapins (in fresh water).  I was caught out during a professional exam (my FRCR - I am an oncologist) when one of the multiple-choice questions asked whether etoposide (a form of chemotherapy) came from the mandrake plant.  In the USA the answer would be true.  In the UK (where I was taking the exam) it should have been false, but I have no idea whether the examiners knew that.  If you stick with Latin names it is precise and avoids confusion.  Though be aware that the Latin names change from time to time as an organism is reclassified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a couple of searches for insects using the Latin names. I'd certainly agree that the scientific name is an essential for nature photographers - not only a Latin name, but the CORRECT Latin name. There are a worrying number of animal pictures on Alamy with bad/awful captions - having the correct Latin name not only helps in searches but also adds credibility to the caption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I add the most common name and the latest scientific name to essential keywords.

 

I add uncommon common names, out of date scientific names, plurals, and common spellings errors to main keywords.

 

There are two things to remember:

 

Clients may not be experts in the subject matter.

 

You have to keyword for a worldwide marketplace.

 

Wickipedia is a good place to harvest worldwide information.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philippe

 

"PS: English is not my native language, but I do believe the correct spelling is "Brants' whistling rat" (like "Jesus' Last Supper"). But, who am I to argue with Auntie Beeb  ;)"

 

It depends on whether it's named after someone called Brant or Brants.  I suspect the former (although I am not a whistling rat expert) in which case it should be Brant's whistling rat.  But, as you rightly say, many researchers are not very good spellers.  And Alamy's keywording system does strange things with apostrophes, anyway.

 

And many scientific names were spelled wrongly at the time they were described and convention dictates that the spelling has to stand.  So the squirrel treefrog is Hyla squirella, for instance.  

 

Chris

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure it will matter, but I find white lion on your image misleading Jill. White lions are completely all white from birth to my knowledge?  :unsure:

 

The male as you can see is very white, but the lioness' do seem to have a blonde tinge to them.

 

Here's what I found online:

 

"White lions are not albino lions. Instead, the white color is caused by a recessive gene known as chinchilla or color inhibitor. They vary from blonde through to near white, however some can also be red. This coloration gives white lions a distinct disadvantage in nature because they are highly visible. This gives them away to their prey and makes them an attractive target for hunters. According to Linda Tucker, in "Mystery of the White Lions - Children of the Sun God" they are bred in camps in South Africa as trophies for canned hunts"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It appears to be (Anton) Brants.  This from the The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals (Google Books)

 

Thanks for the information :)

Have a greenie from me and I'll take one myself 'cause my hunch was right after all. Hmmmmm..... can't do that! :mellow:  Ah well, I'll take an extra biscuit with my cappuccino ^_^

 

Cheers,

Philippe

 

 

Well, have one from me instead, then.

 

Nice to learn something new - you never know when you might come across a whistling rat (I'm sure there's a joke there somewhere).  Good work Danny.

 

Chris 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It appears to be (Anton) Brants.  This from the The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals (Google Books)

 

Thanks for the information :)

Have a greenie from me and I'll take one myself 'cause my hunch was right after all. Hmmmmm..... can't do that! :mellow:  Ah well, I'll take an extra biscuit with my cappuccino ^_^

 

Cheers,

Philippe

 

 

Well, have one from me instead, then.

 

Nice to learn something new - you never know when you might come across a whistling rat (I'm sure there's a joke there somewhere).  Good work Danny.

 

Chris 

 

 

NP - greenies all round!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.