Jump to content

What happened here?


geogphotos

Recommended Posts

Totally flummoxed. 

 

A developing fault in the camera firmware maybe?  (Not developing as in developing image).

 

Or an intermittent connection fault in Camera?

 

Sorry can't really help but interesting and will keep an eye on the thread.

 

Allan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has happened seems clear, but why would be pure speculation. The red and blue channels have been output as one file to produce the magenta image, and the green channel has for some reason been allocated to a separate file. You may be able to merge the channels in PS to recover the image.


Possible reasons are potentially endless, but if it happens again I would suggest reinstalling the camera's firmware if that is possible. If you were on a moving vehicle a jolt could have caused a brief interruption of power, but I would have expected that to just generate a corrupted file. You could go as far as suggesting a cosmic ray passed through the chip and flipped a bit at just the wrong time: diagnosis on an isolated event is very difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, wiskerke said:

Shutting the camera off while files are being written?

 

wim

 

Yes always wait till the little flashy light turns off.  Now where is the damned thing.

 

Allan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are probably other ways for it to happen, but the only one that really makes sense to me is that the green sensor data got saved to the next image buffer. There must be a register somewhere in the processor which identifies the active buffer. If the data in that register is incremented prematurely after only two colour channels have been read, it would point to the next buffer, and the final channel data would be directed there. As each buffer holds an image, each is output as a separate file to the removable media. But the question would still remain, why did the buffer pointer increment after only two channels were read?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solar activity is moderately high at the moment - as evidenced by the auroral displays - so that can't be totally ruled out. If the image was captured on the 21st, there was an M1.7 solar flare on that day. Prior to that there was a more powerful X1.2 on 29/3. Of course, any match with the date of a flare would probably be coincidental, but you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.