John Mitchell Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) Has anyone figured out what the 1000 year duration included recently in some licensing terms is all about? I guess it makes a bit more sense than "in perpetuity." However, we'll all be gone by then, perhaps even the whole human race will except for billionaires who could afford to escape to Mars before Earth boiled over. 👨🚀 Edited September 6, 2021 by John Mitchell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Just now, John Mitchell said: Has anyone figured out what the 1000 year duration included recently in some licensing terms is all about? I guess it makes a bit more sense than "in perpetuity.' However, we'll all be gone by then, perhaps even the whole human race except for billionaires who could afford to escape to Mars before Earth boiled over. 👨🚀 Rather silly I think. Maybe a misprunt?? Kumar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Doc said: Rather silly I think. Maybe a misprunt?? Kumar Or perhaps it's a subtle (?) way of suggesting that we make all our images RF. Edited September 6, 2021 by John Mitchell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avpics Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 3 minutes ago, John Mitchell said: Has anyone figured out what the 1000 year duration included recently in some licensing terms is all about? I guess it makes a bit more sense than "in perpetuity." Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geogphotos Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Just now, Avpics said: Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. 1000 years? Do you think Alamy will then allow refunds? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geogphotos Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Avpics said: Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. deleted glitch Edited September 6, 2021 by geogphotos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geogphotos Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Avpics said: Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. more computer glitch deleted Edited September 6, 2021 by geogphotos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Avpics said: Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. Good point. When I was doing freelance writing, some publications started including the phrase "throughout the universe" in addition to "in perpetuity" in their "all rights" contracts. I wonder if we'll start seeing that in the "region" part of the licensing terms. Edited September 6, 2021 by John Mitchell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 14 minutes ago, geogphotos said: 1000 years? Do you think Alamy will then allow refunds? Over my dead body! 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Ventura Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Avpics said: Perhaps some parties do prefer a stated period of time over the open ended 'in perpetuity'. A computerised system may struggle to understand that idea. Wouldn't 100 years have sufficed?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Estall Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) This started out in the area of independent TV production in the US and just spread as staff moved about and took the ideas with them or they were just looking over each others shoulders. It is, of course, utter nonsense. Back in the days operating as a niche agency I almost always managed to get it stuck out as a matter of principal Edited September 6, 2021 by Robert M Estall 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted September 7, 2021 Author Share Posted September 7, 2021 6 hours ago, Michael Ventura said: Wouldn't 100 years have sufficed?? One would think so, certainly in my case. 👴 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jansos Posted September 17, 2021 Share Posted September 17, 2021 On 06/09/2021 at 20:37, John Mitchell said: Has anyone figured out what the 1000 year duration included recently in some licensing terms is all about? I guess it makes a bit more sense than "in perpetuity." However, we'll all be gone by then, perhaps even the whole human race will except for billionaires who could afford to escape to Mars before Earth boiled over. 👨🚀 That's what I call a long-term business model - a Tausendjähriges Reich or "Thousand-Year Reich" in the making! 😞 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now