All Activity
- Past hour
-
John Morrison - you okay?
Steven Gillis replied to geogphotos's question in Community support: ask the forum
Thereโs an update on Johnโs condition on his blog. -
First ever QC failure in nearly 6 years.
IKuzmin replied to Brizbee's question in Community support: ask the forum
Yes, that was my assessment as well, I mentioned above. -
New Personal Low
Sultanpepa replied to CarlMillerPhotos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
That's just unacceptable and makes me angry. To Alamy: The image has got to be worth more to the buyer than 16 cents or if not please just don't sell them. -
First ever QC failure in nearly 6 years.
M.Chapman replied to Brizbee's question in Community support: ask the forum
I wonder if some folks are just looking at the low res blurry preview.... Anyone making comments should download the full res image 4,500 x 3,000 pixel image and then inspect at 100% (or 200% on a retina screen) before making a judgement. I can see #253 and #254 but very, very faintly. IMO It's the texture of the bark in the photo in particular that has lost detail (NR has obliterated it). The splintered wood on the other hand still looks sharpish because the higher contrast linear features it contains have been enhanced by the sharpening, but the more subtle texture has gone. Mark -
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Thanks for the suggestions. I will have a try with them. -
-
-
New Personal Low
IKuzmin replied to CarlMillerPhotos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
I had several 0.02 with another agency, it was for China and I could not cut the country out of distribution. Therefore just cancelled my contract with that agency. On Alamy I so far did not have that low (with a very limited list of countries where I allow distribution and no NU of course) but it feels that we go that direction anyway. Had recently a ~$5 "standard" license of an RM image with nearly unlimited use allowed ๐ -
John Morrison - you okay?
Alex Ramsay replied to geogphotos's question in Community support: ask the forum
Thanks, Allan -
Condensation soft spot
IKuzmin replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
So did I answer you? Or you want me to elaborate something? Sorry for a mess in my initial post (i.e. "questions to your answer" instead of the opposite), was in the middle of a conference call... - Today
-
Sandha_Ru joined the community
-
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Compare the railings and cars I have ACR but only basic knowledge of the processes you are describing. Thanks -
Huge neon signs and video display on the side of a building in Piccadilly Circus in London with pedestrians and a London bus in front. England, UK
-
Condensation soft spot
Steve F replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Barely noticeable. I don't think a QC fail. I would maybe add a radial gradient mask and fiddle with the clarity/dehaze sliders. But I don't think you use Lightroom. -
Those fire ants are a real pest. Their tunnels are up to 30m long. They all come up after the rain. Their bite is painful and the blisters are very itchy and painful. They last a week. You don't want those ants in your garden, I can tell you.
-
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
I don't know any of this - hence the question. ๐ตโ๐ซ -
New Personal Low
spacecadet replied to CarlMillerPhotos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Don't eat your celebratory biscuit all at once now........ -
Images licensed April 2024
gvallee replied to VbFolly's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Hall's Babbler - $ Amazing the number of bird licenses recently -
Condensation soft spot
IKuzmin replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Sorry, I do not see soft spots on these images at the available resolution. But there are several questions to your answer. In Photoshop. 1. Paint a mask by a brush on the desired area and apply the desired changes within it. 2. Go to Select and Mask environment, mask an area there, and make it going to a new layer. Than you can do whatever in that new layer and it will be on top of your background. 3. Use ACR as a filter, and paint a mask there, doing all adjustments available in ACR within the masked area. I think that you know all this though, so am not sure that I understood your question correctly. -
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Once you see it you can't stop seeing it.... Thanks for the tip. -
Condensation soft spot
spacecadet replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
I hardly see it, but you could try a spotting tool with a wide feather edge. -
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Aw thanks Allan. ๐ -
Condensation soft spot
Allan Bell replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Not particularly. I have soft spots for lots of people you included. Allan -
Condensation soft spot
geogphotos replied to geogphotos's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Is there a local correction tool - lasso or something - that can be used to increase contrast just in one area of an image? -
Adobe Denoise - nutz not to use it?
Allan Bell replied to MDM's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
If it wasn't for Denoise I would not have uploaded as many images as I have up to date. Allan