wiskerke

The proof is in the sales licenses. And in the order in which they appear in searches. Maybe include some filters, like with people; with or without release. For this particular one, you may have to wait until next winter and the trees are bare again. wim

Google Vexatious or Frivolous litigation. It's a common business tactic. wim

I missed a step I think: Extensions > Manage Extensions > jKeywording | Stock photo keyword generator - this already has an on-off switch > on > Details But the on-off is repeated at the top in the Details menu. > Pin to toolbar - is one of on-off switches somewhere in the middle of the list: (most lines have a on-off switch at the end of the line; some have a link) jKeywording | Stock photo keyword generator Off/On Description Adds a contextual menu to images for keywording actions on stock photography contributor websites (Alamy, Getty, etc) Version 24.3.15.1 Size < 1 MB Permissions Read your browsing history Display notifications Know your email address Site access This extension can read and change your data on sites. You can control which sites the extension can access. Automatically allow access on the following sites https://*.alamy.com/* https://esp.gettyimages.com/* https://jkeywording.jbcloud.workers.dev/* Site settings Pin to toolbar Allow in Incognito Warning: Google Chrome cannot prevent extensions from recording your browsing history. To disable this extension in Incognito mode, unselect this option. Allow access to file URLs Extension options View in Chrome Web Store Source Chrome Web Store Remove extension wim

Try 3 dots menu > Extensions > jKeywording | Stock photo keyword generator > Details > Pin to toolbar wim edit: and right click on the image while in AIM.

728,866 images currently on Alamy. At least with that keyword. But the first pages indeed have some good images. Not all: Stunning brunette lady touched by her jealous husband - I guess it may be the exact right description for that market. And there are even searches: 75 for the current rolling year. Some fine examples: stunning images of the world aroundus stunningly nude native tribal women 2AT4N8H HRH wearing a stunning black dress commissioned from All without any result btw. Even when aroundus is corrected. Two for the stunning black dress without the Alamy ref #. (It's the Revenge Dress.) stunning tulips in vase. Result at last! 19 images of not very impressive tulips 12 of which without a vase. Plus 3 videos! Also not very stunning either. Should we all start using stunning fabulous great fantastic amazing? Maybe yes. Especially when AI is going to drive searches also. Which of course it will. wim

US Standard License for 1 user. Mid lower $$ (PU + 1 ct) First time for this one from 2015. Lake Eau Claire reservoir Wisconsin. The AI caption: Stunning reflection of trees and sky on calm lake waters at sunset with cloudscape. My caption: Lake Eau Claire reservoir Wisconsin. Wonder what the search term was. Not zoomed. No zoom recorded reported. wim

The video explains it all. I had to check a box I think for the icon to show in the task bar. Before that I had to go through Extensions. But it's not impossible the icon had been there already. wim edit: I use an empty document to copy/paste the keywords to.

The ZV-E10 is a Sony a6100 with some extra video and vlogging stuff. APS-C sensor. So it's not the camera. Current gear: Every Day Carry: RX100 V and VI. Regular camera: A7RII. Renting on occasions: A7RIV. The older part of my portfolio on Alamy was shot on EOS 1DS II and III. The oldest images are scanned analog 35mm slides. wim

Highly interesting. Brilliant work! I've just checked it against 10 of my images and yes it does find lots of keywords I had not considered at the time. Sometimes it even finds the exact subject. The descriptions are not too bad. If you're really bad at keywording this may well lead to sales. Especially on the micros. Maybe here as well. wim

Sowjetisches Ehrenmal im Tiergarten. Berlin Soviet War Memorial with German Parliament building in the background. Editorial Magazine. Print run up to 500,000. Inside or cover. Wonder which one this is. Magazines by circulation UK. Taken November 2018 - first time licensed. Lowest (almost) possible $$. wim

One more with fire fighters: Different details: Country: Worldwide Usage: Commercial electronic, E-learning, website and social media and app, any size, single placement and design, worldwide, in perpetuity Media: Editorial website Start: 16 April 2024 Duration: In perpetuity Is that better or worse than unlimited? 😂 Anyway low cents; pennies. Direct. wim

Thank you for spotting this one! You found another article with the same image just the other day. Maybe keep an eye on the sales report. 😉😉 wim

Let's hope the regular clients don't get wind of this. wim

Blush. Thank you! We're visiting quite often, roughly every 2 years usually end of summer from around Labor Day. And we've lived in DC for 3.5 years ending in 2007. Just 2000ft or 3 blocks up the road from the Mall and 2700ft West from the rear entrance of the WH. Which would have been on our street and 4 or 5 blocks if they hadn't put in that garden and those two huge buildings on either side of the WH. Sounds posh, but it wasn't really - it's on the edge of GW University and many students were living in the building. The protest image probably was 30 min. from our backdoor. On foot. Gettysburg is not far from DC and we went there a couple of times. But this one was on a visit when we were with friends who had friends over who wanted to see the Battle Fields. So I said I know a good one that's close and has lots to see for foreign visitors. wim

Is your file 8 bit and not 16 bit? If not > Image > Mode. Is your file a single Background layer? (Not a Layer 0.) If not > Layer > Flatten image. wim