Michael Ventura Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 http://www.diyphotography.net/10-famous-landmarks-youre-allowed-photograph-commercial-use/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Diyphotographynet+%28DIYPhotography.net+-+Photography+and+Studio+Lighting%29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 So the queen is copyrighted. Cool. I wonder if the other Royals are fair game (not that I'm interested in photographing them). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Ventura Posted November 20, 2014 Author Share Posted November 20, 2014 The real crazy one is Ayers Rock, in Australia! Is the almighty creator the one holding the copyright to that natural formation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MariaJ Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I looked at the wiki linked to the article. Some interesting items there. Didn't realize the Canadian legions Remembrance Day poppy was on the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 The real crazy one is Ayers Rock, in Australia! Is the almighty creator the one holding the copyright to that natural formation? © God 550 Ma / All Rights Reserved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Not at all your fault, Michael, but this is a poorly put together article with all kinds of mistakes and misinformation. If I had an hour or more to kill, I would point some of them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kuta Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Big credibility gap - the writer assumes that if he saw an image in an RF collection, then the subject must be fair game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustydingo Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Had a quick gander . . . wish I hadn't now, fell for just another puffed up piece of click-bait! I should have learned by now . . . any online article that identifies itself as the 10 worst this or the 10 best that etc etc can without hesitation be dismissed as click-bait and ignored . . . and I know a website with 10 reasons why I'm right . . . dd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 'Click-bait'. That's a new one on me. Quick, DD, trademark it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustydingo Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 'Click-bait'. That's a new one on me. Quick, DD, trademark it. not original I'm afraid . . . but oh so apt. dd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Ventura Posted November 21, 2014 Author Share Posted November 21, 2014 Great term, "click bait"! I fell for it. Sorry I posted the link. Now if can just get the hook out of my mouth! (or should I say, fingers) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustydingo Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Great term, "click bait"! I fell for it. Sorry I posted the link. Now if can just get the hook out of my mouth! We all fall for it at times . . . and one very astute and creative and forward-thinking contributor has a great image covering it already. dd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Great term, "click bait"! I fell for it. Sorry I posted the link. Now if can just get the hook out of my mouth! (or should I say, fingers) Nobody's blaming you, Michael. We've all stepped onto that flypaper. "Click bate." I like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.