John Mitchell Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 I hesitate (honest) to start another discussion about shallow depth of field images, but when is shallow too shallow? I have a couple of images that I'm concerned about. They were purposely shot with a very narrow (less then 10% of the horizontal height) band in focus across most of the frame. Alamy now defines "soft and lacking definition" as,"Marked difference in definition between low-res comp & when viewed at 100%" in their recently updated submission guidelines. So I assume that all I have to do is reduce the image to 1300 pixels on the long side (size of comp, I believe) and compare it with the full-sized image. Right? Still Paranoid in Vancouver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.