Jump to content

Robert Harding


Recommended Posts

So, when you sign with RH, you are required to submit your photos "on an image exclusive basis",  which means that you can't sell them on Alamy, but they are free to use your Alamy photos as they like without your explicit consent? What's the point with Alamy to accept such an apparently disadvantageous agreement? Furthermore, if published, are those pictures credited to Author/Alamy or to RH Picture Library?

Edited by riccarbi
  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, geogphotos said:

 

 

Isn't that showing all the agencies that have images on Alamy with the keywords 'Toronto'?

 

Not showing where Alamy images are with other agencies.

 

Yes, I just chose "toronto" at random. I believe that Reimar was asking the opposite question -- i.e. does RH have images with Alamy, which it apparently does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, John Mitchell said:

 

Yes, I just chose "toronto" at random. I believe that Reimar was asking the opposite question -- i.e. does RH have images with Alamy, which it apparently does.

 

He asked this John:

 

Quick question: does Alamy provide images to Robert Harding for re-distribution? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh - those are images from RH on Alamy.

No, I was wondering how at least 7 of my images ended up on RH.  I thought of Alamy first, but it could be age.  It's not UIG.  Micro sites wouldn't count either.

So, I'm not sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Reimar said:

Oh - those are images from RH on Alamy.

No, I was wondering how at least 7 of my images ended up on RH.  I thought of Alamy first, but it could be age.  It's not UIG.  Micro sites wouldn't count either.

So, I'm not sure.

 

Sorry. I stand corrected. It's a tangled Web we've woven...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Quick question: does Alamy provide images to Robert Harding for re-distribution? 

 

This would be very, very strange. I can understand RH selling my pictures on Alamy, even if they would earn me less than selling them on Alamy directly.
But, I cant' get the point of Alamy selling contributors' images through RH;  that would benefit nobody except RH. It looks to me a logical short circuit, am I wrong?
Maybe Reimar signed with RH years ago, and doesn't remember it?

Edited by riccarbi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.