Lynn Palmer Posted September 25, 2014 Share Posted September 25, 2014 Is anyone else familiar with this topic that can help explain it for me? Is this an inaccurate article that distorts the meaning of the law or are they serious and I need a $1500 permit to take stock photographs in U.S. National Parks? If so I sure won't be wasting any time or money visiting any of these parks. If true, it's quite sad. http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/1000-dollar-fine-for-pictures-in-the-forest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.