Jump to content

More Pictures...


Chris1603

Recommended Posts

Hi Chris,

Some nice images in there. Your choice of subject matter looks a lot more commercial now.

 

Captions are searchable by clients. And your captions are often too short. Try to make full use of the 150 characters available to you. e.g.

 

McLaren P1 GTR Hypercar - Image ID: 2PN1N5G

Is it new, old? Where is it?

For example:

The McLaren P1 GTR Hypercaris is a sports car produced by British marque Mclaren Automotive. It is a plug-in-hybrid. Seen here at x motor show.

Google and Wikipedia are your friend!

 

Stunning, fully restored, Travel Air Type R Mystery Ship Racing Aircraft - Image ID: 2K1CYYE

Especially as you don't take a lot of images, you can take time with your captions to be accurate and specific. This image is taken within the cockpit of the dashboard / instrument panel of the plane.

 

openai-chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-s

Try taking a version of this with your hand in shot 'selecting' something on screen

 

gas-and-electricity-energy-use-smart-met

Smart meter is far too small in shot for this image to be used to illustrate a smart meter concept.

 

views-of-the-village-of-pampaneira-in-th

Don't bother uploading images like this. Your main subject is completely in shadow. You've also got a massive dust spot in the middle of the sky. This would have failed Alamy QC if they had reviewed this image.

 

An unopened Mars bar chocolate bar on plain background - Image ID: 2K819WC

an-unopened-mars-bar-chocolate-bar-on-pl

How about taking another version in a more realistic setting? And another version where you're unwrapping it. You've also got the same sensor dust spot as the Spanish image above. Make sure you use editing software to check for dust spots and get rid of them. And clean your sensor / lens! 🙃

 

Good luck,

Steve

 

Edited by Steve F
  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PatsyCollins said:

I notice you've put 'no' to 'property' even on pictures featuring brand names or of cars. From my understanding of the term 'property' in this context, those things count as 'yes'. 

It catches me out sometimes but the 'No' refers to releases, not property. We never get to see if a contributor says whether the image contains property though if they turn up in Vital without releases then they won't have done.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Harry Harrison said:

 We never get to see if a contributor says whether the image contains property though if they turn up in Vital without releases then they won't have done.

Ah – my mistake!

Thanks for explaining.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Steve F said:

Hi Chris,

Some nice images in there. Your choice of subject matter looks a lot more commercial now.

 

Captions are searchable by clients. And your captions are often too short. Try to make full use of the 150 characters available to you. e.g.

 

McLaren P1 GTR Hypercar - Image ID: 2PN1N5G

Is it new, old? Where is it?

For example:

The McLaren P1 GTR Hypercaris is a sports car produced by British marque Mclaren Automotive. It is a plug-in-hybrid. Seen here at x motor show.

Google and Wikipedia are your friend!

 

Stunning, fully restored, Travel Air Type R Mystery Ship Racing Aircraft - Image ID: 2K1CYYE

Especially as you don't take a lot of images, you can take time with your captions to be accurate and specific. This image is taken within the cockpit of the dashboard / instrument panel of the plane.

 

openai-chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-s

Try taking a version of this with your hand in shot 'selecting' something on screen

 

gas-and-electricity-energy-use-smart-met

Smart meter is far too small in shot for this image to be used to illustrate a smart meter concept.

 

views-of-the-village-of-pampaneira-in-th

Don't bother uploading images like this. Your main subject is completely in shadow. You've also got a massive dust spot in the middle of the sky. This would have failed Alamy QC if they had reviewed this image.

 

An unopened Mars bar chocolate bar on plain background - Image ID: 2K819WC

an-unopened-mars-bar-chocolate-bar-on-pl

How about taking another version in a more realistic setting? And another version where you're unwrapping it. You've also got the same sensor dust spot as the Spanish image above. Make sure you use editing software to check for dust spots and get rid of them. And clean your sensor / lens! 🙃

 

Good luck,

Steve

 

 

I agree with Steve's comments on the top three but I do see unopened products on white sell.  I have a bunch and have had decent sales.  I would take the background to a more clean white though,  I do that in Photoshop.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Michael Ventura said:

 

I agree with Steve's comments on the top three but I do see unopened products on white sell.  I have a bunch and have had decent sales.  I would take the background to a more clean white though,  I do that in Photoshop.

 

Thanks. I wasn't saying don't do white backgrounds - my lack of clarification! Additionally do in a natural setting and with you actually interacting with whatever you're shooting if that's sensible.

Edited by Steve F
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Chris1603 said:

Hello,

 

Would greatly appreciate a critique of my updated submissions. Still not many pictures whatsoever, but gradually getting there. Thank you!

Well Chris, I will write what I most often respond to questions from people new to Alamy or stock photography in general: Who, What, Why and How.  Not going to write about specific images, some of which appear to me to be a bit dark?  but file information.  Captions, Keywords, including specific location would be a good idea in my opinion.  As I have written many times; Think about a picture researcher or Photo Editor who is looking to illustrate a story.

 

Chuck

Edited by Chuck Nacke
addition
  • Love 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That dust spot keeps appearing. Until you clean the sensor I would crop it out. With landscapes and big sky I also try to avoid birds in the image, in case Alamy QC thinks the bird is a dust spot. Ken Rockwell advises, I think, not going to a smaller aperture than f11 to reduce the risk of dust spots being too visible. I'm curious if members here think this is good advice. Sometimes we need f36 so it limits the camera if we can't choose that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, zxzoomy said:

That dust spot keeps appearing. Until you clean the sensor I would crop it out. With landscapes and big sky I also try to avoid birds in the image, in case Alamy QC thinks the bird is a dust spot. Ken Rockwell advises, I think, not going to a smaller aperture than f11 to reduce the risk of dust spots being too visible. I'm curious if members here think this is good advice. Sometimes we need f36 so it limits the camera if we can't choose that.

I'd use f36 only for extreme close-ups in the studio but I rarely go above f22. And I know of a very popular photographer and photography tutor famous for using f2.8 or f5.6 for landscapes!!!

Edited by Ognyan Yosifov
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, zxzoomy said:

That dust spot keeps appearing. Until you clean the sensor I would crop it out. With landscapes and big sky I also try to avoid birds in the image, in case Alamy QC thinks the bird is a dust spot. Ken Rockwell advises, I think, not going to a smaller aperture than f11 to reduce the risk of dust spots being too visible. I'm curious if members here think this is good advice. Sometimes we need f36 so it limits the camera if we can't choose that.

 

Dust spots and birds (that look like dust spots) are easy to clean up in Photoshop.  Probably the quickest part of prepping a photo for Alamy.

  • Love 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 25/04/2023 at 18:23, Chris1603 said:

Checked my sensor and there was a big bit of dust or grit on it. I have now blown that off and will see what improvements are made. 

 

If you check every pic, at 100%, especially in the sky areas, you'll catch all the dust-spots...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.