Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ed Rooney

16.9 or 3.2?

Recommended Posts

On my NEX cameras these are the shapes I get to choose from. Simply put, I have no opinion as to which shape I should prefer . . . or why. Which way do most people jump? I've already Googled and read the long, involved technical explanation. There is nothing useful there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you get the same resolution output from both formats ?

 

I wouldn't have thought so.

 

Without knowing more, I would probably opt for the format that represents the ratio of the sensor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with the native format. So on some cameras I have used 4:3 even though I "see" in 3:2 (40+years of 35mm film etc) to get max number of pixels. After all many of the wider formats are effectively crops, I would sooner make that decision after the fact.

 

For stock stills (and much other client work) I would go with max pixels and let the client decide on the crop; the more crop options the more saleable. As DK has often advised elsewhere the mistake many inexperienced photographers make is cropping too tight (to get the nicest pic) and not allowing the client to get the best  crop for THEIR usage.

Edited by Martin P Wilson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 16:9 is just a crop from 3:2. It's to match the full widescreen TV (in the UK we use 14:9, about 1.55:1) and cinema AR of 1.75.

The sensor is APS-C like the rest of them.

I'm no Stanley Kubrick so I stay with 3:2 (although after '2001' he never shot wider that 1.66:1).

Edited by spacecadet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, thank you. 3:2 is what I've been using, so I guess I'll stay with that. I don't shoot many standard landscapes here in NYC. Well, there are cityscapes and Central Park. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed on the RX100 II I keep it on 3:2. That said, I can only see the images on the back of the camera until I get the iMac delivery some time next week. GM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what you select, the raw file is always 3:2 - even if it appears to be 16:9. If you shoot a JPEG though in 16:9 with no file you have lost the cropped area for good. Reasons for not using 16:9 are pretty compelling unless you only intend to show landscape format TV slide shows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed, I shoot RAW in the largest native format, whatever that is for the camera I'm using, then crop if necessary later.

 

Allan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.