Travelshots Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 If an image has made several sales does the computer algorithm show it higher up in search results? Alamy does not have a button to select "most popular" as many other agencies do. Would it be a good idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I find that images that have been licensed one or more times do tend to show up earlier in search results. I haven't researched this thoroughly, but I don't think it's fake news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbimages Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 I don't find that. As an example, an image sold for $600 last year. I have 34 (very different) images of the same subject, and the high selling one comes in at number 19 of my images and place number 125 of 231 images of the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Baker Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Does not the pseudo's own performance determine the promotion of the images within it, not a single image itself? Richard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Indeed Geoff - there's plenty of work to attend to that pays better dividends than search engine speculations. Nevertheless, I will say that you may be right that pseudos in an account are more connected than before. I see some indications to that effect. But, I am definitely seeing large and consistent differences in image placements coming from my three pseudos. So in my experience, individual pseudo ranks still have an impact. So to answer the OP, sales for an image will have an impact on the ranking of all images in that pseudo, and perhaps somewhat less so to all images in your account. But rank does not attach to individual images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.