Pearl Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 I'm afraid I stopped caring about bhz as a sensible measure when I spotted this in my "Your images" search results a few months ago :- bhz 1 1 0 0 0.00 180 0 0.00 Can't get my head round why mine would have shown up within the first two pages of search results (assuming 90 per page) in someone searching on "bhz" when I'm always usually somewhere way down around page 18 or so on a normal search of "bhz". As Alamy says ... bhz position really is irrelvant. This is ignoring the burning question of why someone (who's searching is recorded by Alamy) would be searching on "bhz" in the first place. :-) Carol I also don't understand why they would search BHZ but aside from that, it is possible that yours showed up because they didn't log in until they had gone through several pages. The earlier pages would not have registered in measures. Pearl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDP Posted April 3, 2015 Author Share Posted April 3, 2015 I'm afraid I stopped caring about bhz as a sensible measure when I spotted this in my "Your images" search results a few months ago :- bhz 1 1 0 0 0.00 180 0 0.00 Can't get my head round why mine would have shown up within the first two pages of search results (assuming 90 per page) in someone searching on "bhz" when I'm always usually somewhere way down around page 18 or so on a normal search of "bhz". As Alamy says ... bhz position really is irrelvant. This is ignoring the burning question of why someone (who's searching is recorded by Alamy) would be searching on "bhz" in the first place. :-) Carol Carol, It would have appeared in the first couple of pages because yours is a recent image and the New tab was undoubtedly selected. As for who would do the search, - most probably Alamy, keeping an eye on new entrants! I'm pretty sure their searches show up in Measures. Ian D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famousbelgian Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 I have images with logos which are included as part of the picture. If the image is marked as no release and as RM then it appears to be OK. Allan, yes I agree there is no problem with there being a logo in the picture, but these are images of the logo alone which I thought was not allowed ... surely this is blatant trademark infringement? See the Contributor Guidelines : http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/prepare-images.asp Images that solely feature a logo or trademark - this is a copyright or trademark infringement. Marc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digi2ap Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I have images with logos which are included as part of the picture. If the image is marked as no release and as RM then it appears to be OK. Allan, yes I agree there is no problem with there being a logo in the picture, but these are images of the logo alone which I thought was not allowed ... surely this is blatant trademark infringement? See the Contributor Guidelines : http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/prepare-images.asp Yes, it would seem to be to me and I imagine that the company 'brands' would see it that way too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Robinson Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 It seems there's an area of Tennessee called Black Haven Zone, often shortened to BHZ. There don't appear to be any images of it on Alamy - anyone doing a search for that area is going to be very confused by the search results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Bell Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 That will knock our CTR. Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southpole Posted April 5, 2015 Share Posted April 5, 2015 BHZ page 11 need to try hard no zooms in Jan feb a few in march Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.