BidC Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Hi, Am just wondering if a property release needs to be signed for images of other peoples pets ? Thanks for any guidance, Bridget Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Ashmore Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 To sell for commercial use.. yes, you need a release. To sell for editorial reasons.. no release needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 3 hours ago, Matt Ashmore said: To sell for commercial use.. yes, you need a release. To sell for editorial reasons.. no release needed. OTOH there are literally millions of commercially available RF images of dogs, cats, etc. on microstock sites, and the majority of them are probably unreleased shots of other people's pets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avpics Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 ....but I've sold a few RM of my own pets (with property objects) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Ashmore Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 12 hours ago, John Mitchell said: OTOH there are literally millions of commercially available RF images of dogs, cats, etc. on microstock sites, and the majority of them are probably unreleased shots of other people's pets. Personally on Alamy, I would put them up as for sale with an RM license with property = YES, property release = NO unless it was my own pet in which case probably just RF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.