spacecadet Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Beware. I've just had images fail on a resub which weren't marked as failed in a previous failed batch. One of them must have been right next to the one which failed on their monitor-it had the consecutive filename and was of the same subject. Now I don't know what to resubmit. Make your minds up please QC. Interestingly, a batch in QC at the same time passed. At least I didn't get chucked back in the sinbin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Beware. I've just had images fail on a resub which weren't marked as failed in a previous failed batch. One of them must have been right next to the one which failed on their monitor-it had the consecutive filename and was of the same subject. Now I don't know what to resubmit. Make your minds up please QC. That's because when they find one failed image in a batch they stop looking.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 NO, they found two. Then they found another two on the resub. A different two of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustydingo Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 FGS, just because an image wasn't identified as a fail in one submission but was when resubmitted confirms absolutely nothing (even if it was right next door to one that failed). In my experience, the reason any image fails lies in factors present before it's submitted, not after. dd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 It's just that it's outside my experience to have a resub failed on images which didn't fail the first time. Particularly as they were similars. It also suggests to me that QC is stricter now and sometimes seems arbitrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulstw Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I never ever re-subbed anything from a failed batch. That happened to me too. I just put it down to them thinking I was going through a rough spot on checking so nothing could be trusted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alamy Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 NO, they found two. Then they found another two on the resub. A different two of course. We were trying to help you out Mark by flagging a couple and processing the failure quicker than normal. We're not inconsistent and no stricter than before. We always spot check a sample, if the sample fails, all images fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alamy Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 FGS, just because an image wasn't identified as a fail in one submission but was when resubmitted confirms absolutely nothing (even if it was right next door to one that failed). In my experience, the reason any image fails lies in factors present before it's submitted, not after. dd Spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.