Images in re-published articles

[JaniMarkus Hasa]

I just found an Guardian article about vintage shopping that contained one of my images being re-published at another site. 

 

The original article:

https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2019/nov/16/retro-vintage-shopping-shops-markets-berlin-bilbao-naples-boedeaux-helsinki-vienna

 

Re-published at:

http://www.tripulous.com/2019/11/six-of-europes-best-cities-for-vintage-and-retro-shopping/

 

Don't know if The Guardian is OK with this, but since this re-use of my image have not been reported, I'm not. Any similar experiences?

 

[Niels Quist]

Sometimes it is allowed, sometimes not. You could try and report it to Alamy as an unauthorised use and see what happens. They will require a contact e-mail address, though.

[mickfly]

Their website articles aren't all attributed to Newspapers, so maybe not a scraper news site, but full of Alamy images.

[Russell]

Their Terms of Use seem fairly clear:

 

"Copyright Notice

This website and its content is copyright Wrongmog Ltd. Some content is copyright companies who have licensed their content to us. ©Wrongmog Ltd – 2013. All rights reserved.

Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited other than the following:

• you may print or download to a local hard disk extracts for your personal and non-commercial use only
• you may copy the content to individual third parties for their personal use, but only if you acknowledge the website as the source of the material

You may not, except with our express written permission, distribute or commercially exploit the content. Nor may you transmit it or store it in any other website or other form of electronic retrieval system."

 

So, unless the came to an arrangement with The Guardian, of bought a licence from Alamy it's a clear infringement.