![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r229753/set_resources_5/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r229753/set_resources_5/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_default_photo.png)
Jools Elliott
Verified-
Posts
690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://www.ethereal-light.com
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Back of beyond
Alamy
-
Alamy URL
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/?cid=V9S9F822TCXB2WDJBTDHY9SW7W4JRQHM3CTQUTULR4XDEHYSSL837TFYYN2JDUZG&name=Julian%2bElliott&st=12&mode=0&comp=1
-
Images
8697
-
Joined Alamy
08 Oct 2009
Recent Profile Visitors
1,398 profile views
Jools Elliott's Achievements
-
Dear @Alamy May I ask? Do you actually understand the concept of Rights Managed? That the clue is in the naming of said license? You've just sold two of my images with a period of "In Perpetuity" meaning the licensee has the right to use them forever. So, again, let me introduce you to the concept of what rights managed is. It means that an image is licensed for a specific period of time. It is NOT licensed FOREVER!!! Seriously fed up.
-
@Sultanpepa or maybe helping it more clearer! Sadly the response from @Alamy shows that they don't care one iota about us. So they spent 4 days at the show. I wonder if they explained what they've just done to contributors and that we all know it'll probably happen again as they bring themselves into line with other libraries.
-
It probably wouldn't have been a good idea to meet. Sadly I feel that Alamy have let contributors down many times now yet they cannot see that. Professional? Personally, I am ever the professional but sadly I don't see that from Alamy in the way that it has treated contributors. This to me says everything: "ultimately the change in commission structure was a business decision to balance the needs of shareholders, customers, staff, contributors etc that allows us to get us where we need to be for future success." How many times do we have to hear this? Seriously? It's never balanced in favour of the contributor. It's always going to be skewed towards the shareholders etc.
-
@Alamy Remember this response to me on Twitter Mr Allsworth: I think it’s exactly this kind of response which makes engaging on these issues pretty redundant - happy to look into the specifics on this one tomorrow when I’m back in the office but needless to say it won’t be “Full RF” - far from it. This in response to the selling of a RM image as near RF. I'm still waiting for the response to this. Tomorrow was about 2 months ago. For me it shows just how engaged management are with the very people who provide content and ultimately pay their wages. As @geogphotos says, how would you feel seeing your wages cut? The reality is that it's not going to happen but it will to us. Such a sad sad way to go about business and completely unnecessary.
-
I think what we DO understand about the agency business is that time and time again we are getting screwed over. How many times did @Alamy say the commission wouldn't be dropped etc? And yet here we are again! And no response from them either which speaks volumes. They go on and on about how fair they are to photographers but their words are now meaningless and full of cr@p. They are no better than any other agency out there.