Jump to content

FocusUno

Verified
  • Content Count

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Forum reputation = neutral

About FocusUno

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={94257482-9EF4-445D-8261-0BD51482D698}&name=Rosie+Betancourt
  • Images
    10
  • Joined Alamy
    03 Mar 2004

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. is one allowed to submit them? is there requirement such as upsizing? have never submitted them, don't know if totally disallowed? just got free Samsung Galaxy A12 with new wireless contract,, any comments on that model's IQ appreciated; have read wide angle (not ultra wide) has highest IQ...?
  2. 2020-2021 emphasis = reworking proven sellers as evidence overwhelming that future licenses come from past-licensed images & if a license is first time seller.....it gets reworked; this strategy is chased due to unwillingness of wifey to travel until destination hospitals are back to normal, because one never knows...
  3. how sad especially when solution is so simple become subagent for free historical photos such as https://www.loc.gov/free-to-use/ but its OK to continue moaning whilst building up your subagent collection, as some feel lost otherwise...?
  4. the last hectosecond has been horrifically slow the last gigasecond has been about average 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭 🧭
  5. some are reworking just their proven "sellers" with goal to make them more frequent sellers... of course when a non-seller sells first time, it becomes member of proven seller club & gets reworked... 🎖️ 🎖️ 🎖️ (note: I represent these images, they are NOT my images: Images: 10)
  6. if willing, what were specifics of your reworking that IYO caused rise in your CTR, rise in your licensing...? Or does no one think their reworking was worthwhile? IMC, a very slow rise in CTR, a noticeable licensing of reworked images, but whether or not they would have been licensed any way is unknown... reworking = elimination of tangential supertags with other meanings, applying recently learned processing
  7. Graphics, can't advsie. As to photos: Some like that borderline HDR look that makes viewers wonder, "is it HDR or is it real it looks real, yet..." try this if you dare: in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.8 to some dark images b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0 some don't want viewers thinking "its a flash photo" so they use fill flash with a light touch some don't wan
  8. Your "730" link led to a blank page but how about this...: Some like that borderline HDR look that makes viewers wonder, "is it HDR or is it real it looks real, yet..." try this if you dare: in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add (can't see images) b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0 some don't want viewers thinking "its a flash photo" so they use fill flash with a light touch
  9. Posted recently, still believe it: Some like that borderline HDR look that makes viewers wonder, "is it HDR or is it real it looks real, yet..." try this if you dare: in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +1 to those too dark b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0 some don't want viewers thinking "its a flash photo" so they use fill flash with a light touch some don't want vie
  10. Some like that borderline HDR look that makes viewers wonder, "is it HDR or is it real it looks real, yet..." try this if you dare: in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.7 b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0 some don't want viewers thinking "its a flash photo" so they use fill flash with a light touch some don't want viewers thinking "its an HDR photo" so they use sliders
  11. P40 Yoga Lenovo Thinkpad since 2016 ne'er a problem
  12. you may disagree but as for me in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.5 b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0
  13. I've often said... in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.4 b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0
  14. here I go again: in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.4 b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0
  15. I've said it before, I'll say it again in ACR or similar: a. exposure slider add +0.7 b. contrast slider to +60 c. highlights slider to -80 d. shadows slider to +80 e. texture slider to +40 f. vibrance slider to +40 g. saturation slider to 0
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.