Nick Jenkins Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Has anyone ever had a QC rejection through flare? I have a shot which has flare down it albeit just a few blobs - it looks "creative"!! But not sure what QC stance is! nj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 No. It's not a criterion AFAIK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jenkins Posted July 26, 2013 Author Share Posted July 26, 2013 Thanks Mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 That's easy: just search for flare. 35,918 Results of which 46 pages are in Creative. A lot is permitted, including introducing flare in Photoshop. The shadows on the snow show where the sun really is: - it's not digitally altered of course ;-) wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jenkins Posted July 26, 2013 Author Share Posted July 26, 2013 Thanks Wim - off I go to upload then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jenkins Posted July 26, 2013 Author Share Posted July 26, 2013 I should have hought to look in the collection before I asked that - oops. Thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 I think most off-beat effects—blur, flare, distortion, selective focus—are understood by QC and accepted . . . as long they they appear deliberate for effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jenkins Posted July 26, 2013 Author Share Posted July 26, 2013 Thanks Ed - it's gone in so fingers crossed!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.