Sultanpepa Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 When buyers search for an image, is it common for them to specify a small file size and if so why? Reason I ask is that an image of mine didn't show up on a search even though keywording was spot on and the only reason it might not show was FS. However it was a 67mb file and much larger than some of mine that did appear in the search. There was only 87 images returned in the search so it wasn't that either. Any ideas apart from "the search engine is broke"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiskerke Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 Last time I checked for [FS] was some months ago. Then it was a bit under 10%. However I always thought of [FS] as a client looking for a large file not a small one. wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sultanpepa Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 Last time I checked for [FS] was some months ago. Then it was a bit under 10%. However I always thought of [FS] as a client looking for a large file not a small one. wim That's what seemed strange to me Wim. I'm not sure why anyone would exclude a larger file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armstrong Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 Could it be a new user to Alamy who doesn't realise that file size doesn't affect price? On some of the Micro's you pay according to the image size not usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sultanpepa Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 Could it be a new user to Alamy who doesn't realise that file size doesn't affect price? On some of the Micro's you pay according to the image size not usage. That seems like a logical explanation but can buyers select such an option for lower FS. Larger, yes, but lower?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losdemas Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 Could just be a left-over selection from a previous search (i.e. the filter was left in place in error)? I have [FS] used (very recently) even when someone was searching for an image of mine by ref #, which was subsequently licensed: of course there was no need for [FS] to be used at all in that instance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.