MMiller Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Apparently there's a need for less cliched photos, plus there's some good factual material about the stock photography business in the article. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-11/how-sheryl-sandberg-and-getty-are-making-stock-photos-less-sexist#r=rss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losdemas Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Thanks for the link; a good article and good to see that (for a while at least) there'll be some more 'normal' images around (and in demand). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linda Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I heard from someone else that Getty will be paying that organization 10% royalties...Less than they pay the contributors? I'm not one,so don't know. L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYCat Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 So all the images used to illustrate the need for images that are not sexist are examples of the sexist ones. Huh? Where are the ones that depict a changed attitude???? Paulette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losdemas Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 So all the images used to illustrate the need for images that are not sexist are examples of the sexist ones. Huh? Where are the ones that depict a changed attitude???? Paulette Good point! Probably disadvantaged by being a male, (I think we more often have our eyes wide open, while wearing blinkers, if you get my drift), I hadn't even thought of that. Have a greenie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.