Steve Tucker Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Sorry if this has been asked before, but if you have a shot of a commercial product that you own, as you own the product but not the brand would you select property release as required or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanGibson Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Generally speaking, yes. Definitely if there is a logo or if it can be particularly identified to a manufacturer or designer. What particular object did you have in mind? Your answer might help to inform others, more experienced members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Tucker Posted August 8, 2015 Author Share Posted August 8, 2015 Hi Ian Well it could be any branded object but in my case was a product shot of a bottle of whisky, so undoubtedly identifiable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanGibson Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Then you would undoubtedly need a propert release for RF. Good luck with that ;-) I should have added that releases are not required for RM licences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecadet Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Think of it as owning the object but not its IP. Like a painting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Tucker Posted August 9, 2015 Author Share Posted August 9, 2015 I should have mentioned its only for RM. Appreciate now it needs to go as not having release. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.