Stan Pritchard Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 I don't know whether many contributors still pay any attention to the old BHZ system, which was a method by which contributors could get some idea of how their images rated in relation to others in searches. For a long time now, there seems to have been little or no change in the order of contributors but I happened today to take a look and there seems to have been considerable changes taking place. In my own case, I've been moved down from position 89 to 91 (out of 3089). In another case, I noticed that a certain contributor has dropped from Page 4 to Page 24. I wonder whether BHZ still has much significance? Any comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ognyan Yosifov Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Stan Pritchard said: I don't know whether many contributors still pay any attention to the old BHZ system, which was a method by which contributors could get some idea of how their images rated in relation to others in searches. For a long time now, there seems to have been little or no change in the order of contributors but I happened today to take a look and there seems to have been considerable changes taking place. In my own case, I've been moved down from position 89 to 91 (out of 3089). In another case, I noticed that a certain contributor has dropped from Page 4 to Page 24. I wonder whether BHZ still has much significance? Any comments? As somebody mentioned in another thread on the subject a few days ago, the whole thing would make sense only if everyone marks the BHZ as a supertag. If everyone of the participants puts BHZ wherever they want as a tag, super tag or in the caption, it's going to be a mess and not accurate at all for the "ranking" criteria... Edited May 6 by Ognyan Yosifov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 I don't think moving down two places constitutes a demotion. Plus, you want to untick RF. BHZ is for RM images only. The total is 2795 not 3089. The image for your pseudo has BHZ only as a supertag, right? Adding BHZ to the caption as well moved my image from page 6 to page 1 (and back again when I removed it from the caption). I personally haven't seen much change in BHZ position for my pseudos. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Pritchard Posted May 6 Author Share Posted May 6 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Reimar said: I don't think moving down two places constitutes a demotion. Plus, you want to untick RF. BHZ is for RM images only. The total is 2795 not 3089. The image for your pseudo has BHZ only as a supertag, right? Adding BHZ to the caption as well moved my image from page 6 to page 1 (and back again when I removed it from the caption). I personally haven't seen much change in BHZ position for my pseudos. Thanks for the reply Reimar, I get your point about unticking RF, having done so, I revert to my position at 89. I'll try your suggestion of adding BHZ to the caption and see if anything else happens. I was interested in whether contributors still use BHZ and from the replies so far, it seems they do. P.S. I've just checked my BHZ image and I already have BHZ in the caption. Edited May 6 by Stan Pritchard Additional information. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimar Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 3 hours ago, Stan Pritchard said: I'll try your suggestion of adding BHZ to the caption and see if anything else happens. Just to be clear: I do NOT suggest putting BHZ in the caption (other than to convince ourselves that keywords in both the caption and as a supertag is powerful for search placement). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Estall Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 (edited) I don't often refer to BHZ but I have had a look just now and it looks pretty much as it ever did. As long as my image is roughly where it has been, that's OK I don't feel the need to be exact. Edited May 7 by Robert M Estall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now