Ball Head Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 Hi, I'm new here and I can see that there are threads after threads of the RM vs RF debate and comparison. However, there's something that has bugged me from the beginning that I still can't understand. The recommendation seems to be that if an image has no release for people or property, it can't be listed as RF, so we should choose RM or RF editorial. But RM images can be used commercially (if that use is specified by the buyer of course). So why don't they require releases? From some of the posts I've read, it seems that some buyers are using unreleased RM images for commercial purposes (sorry I've lost the forum pages for reference). Can this be right, or am I missing something? I would be quite upset if this is being practised as it's a violation of the rights of the people pictured, even in a group (and property owners I guess but I don't feel so strongly about that! :D) Thank you so much for your help! Stay safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now