John Mitchell Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 "What photographers need to realise is that the client is quite important in this business (it's often overlooked by many) and if you expand your client-base, you may need to alter how you offer them licensing terms." Alamy has certainly tried to address this fact with its flexible "hybrid" RM licenses. I wouldn't have said this a few years ago, but these licenses now seem like a good idea -- and an alternative to total RF -- despite the low fees they have generated. At least they give the photographer some say (albeit not much) in how images might be used. It's definitely a buyer's market out there, but the photographer is still an important part of the equation. Personally, I can't get over the feeling that I'm tossing images to the wind when I mark them as RF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.