I've been trying to make my Alamy portfolio page look reasonably acceptable for the past couple of days. Firstly the header image would not load. Having trawled the forum I see this is a known issue with Safari, but, given it has been known for at least a year (from forum post dates) I am very surprised this has not been fixed. Having now successfully uploaded a header image using Chrome, it's disappointing to see that the image quality is horrible. Again this seem to be a known issue and one brought up in the forum some months ago. Given this is a stock image library, one that prides itself on the quality of the images uploaded and its rigorous quality control, to create pages where the first image the public sees looks really low quality and appear quite fuzzy is awful. At the moment the quality is so low I cannot in all seriousness, use this to market or promote my Alamy images. Having gone to all the trouble of creating these pages in the first place - potentially a great marketing tool - I do not understand why Alamy are shooting themselves (and us) in the foot at the final hurdle, or why after months, this problem does not seem to have been addressed. All constructive comments welcome.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Question
Colin Mu
I've been trying to make my Alamy portfolio page look reasonably acceptable for the past couple of days. Firstly the header image would not load. Having trawled the forum I see this is a known issue with Safari, but, given it has been known for at least a year (from forum post dates) I am very surprised this has not been fixed. Having now successfully uploaded a header image using Chrome, it's disappointing to see that the image quality is horrible. Again this seem to be a known issue and one brought up in the forum some months ago. Given this is a stock image library, one that prides itself on the quality of the images uploaded and its rigorous quality control, to create pages where the first image the public sees looks really low quality and appear quite fuzzy is awful. At the moment the quality is so low I cannot in all seriousness, use this to market or promote my Alamy images. Having gone to all the trouble of creating these pages in the first place - potentially a great marketing tool - I do not understand why Alamy are shooting themselves (and us) in the foot at the final hurdle, or why after months, this problem does not seem to have been addressed. All constructive comments welcome.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now