I've just had a "royalty-free" sale for a whopping $1.31 (I know, don't spend it all in one place).
Also this month I've had a couple of "editorial royalty-free" sales for $10 each.
These latter "editorial royalty-free" images were for "non commercial, one time, personal/home use" use. Doesn't sound editorial to me.
The "royalty-free" sale was a larger image and is stated for editorial use on web sites etc. I've seen the image online.
Any idea why this royalty free sale, an explicitly editorial sale to a business, should sell to a news site for less (a lot less!) than a personal home use image? Seems the wrong way around to me.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Question
Peter P
Hi All,
I've just had a "royalty-free" sale for a whopping $1.31 (I know, don't spend it all in one place).
Also this month I've had a couple of "editorial royalty-free" sales for $10 each.
These latter "editorial royalty-free" images were for "non commercial, one time, personal/home use" use. Doesn't sound editorial to me.
The "royalty-free" sale was a larger image and is stated for editorial use on web sites etc. I've seen the image online.
Any idea why this royalty free sale, an explicitly editorial sale to a business, should sell to a news site for less (a lot less!) than a personal home use image? Seems the wrong way around to me.
Thanks,
Peter P.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now