dustydingo Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 You mean Lamont Cranston, wealthy young man about town, who had the power to cloud men's minds so they could not see him? . . . ummm . . . what about Kent Allard? dd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cryptoprocta Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 If you want to argue along the lines of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, how about a historical picture of a woman taken in Canada in 1900? In 1900 in Canada women were not considered persons in law. Therefore you would have to answer no persons in this picture. A person may own their hands, but does a person own their shadow? Another reason to fear for humanity. I thought of the Canadian "persons" example as well. I wonder how many places in the world still don't consider women to be "persons" in the legal sense. Personally, I don't think that we can really own anything, not even our shadows. You can't take it with you, as they say. Take heed, Mr. Trump. The Donald doesn't have a shadow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdh Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 > is a shadow a person? Do enigmas have feelings? Can mysteries be cryptically clear? :ph34r: :ph34r: Note to myself: Need to take images of CCM's (cryptic clear mysteries) and FOE's (feelings of enigma's). . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.