John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 26, 2015 Is this something we need to worry about? http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=33160 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jill Morgan 871 Posted April 26, 2015 Holy Mother! Jill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) But what the heck does it all mean? Does PayPal now own our souls? Edited April 26, 2015 by John Mitchell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arletta 366 Posted April 26, 2015 Their lawyers have absolutely huge imagination... Whatta nonsense. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Crean 384 Posted April 26, 2015 So what exactly does this first line mean?...."When providing us with content or posting content (in each case for publication, whether on- or off-line) using the Services," If we just use PayPal to send and receive payments then we're not providing any content; or, are we? Puzzled.... Phil Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southpole 163 Posted April 26, 2015 bit confusing i only just woke up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DDoug 2,899 Posted April 26, 2015 It's hard to imagine this standing, but if it does I hope it puts the wind at the back of some PayPal alternatives:http://www.screw-paypal.com/alternatives/alternatives.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spacecadet 2,821 Posted April 26, 2015 No. Anyway, what content? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dustydingo 764 Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) Is this something we need to worry about? **** link removed *** I'll wait to see the comments of others who really are lawyers . . . I will never knowingly give a site like r** **e creations the benefit of one single page view by my hand . . . and I'd counsel extreme caution toward any analysis appearing on a website that in the past has published such brilliant articles as the one which championed sea salt and baking soda as the best, all-natural remedy for curing cancer and radiation sickness. Each to his / her own of course . . . dd Edited April 26, 2015 by dustydingo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) deleted Edited April 26, 2015 by John Mitchell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) http://www.thelawtog.com/what-do-paypals-proposed-terms-changes-mean-to-photographers/ Some explanation from the very helpful Rachel Brenke. It is not as bad as you may think. Thanks for the link. It's still all a bit confusing, but I never thought PayPal was really my pal anyway. Edited April 26, 2015 by John Mitchell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paulstw 237 Posted April 27, 2015 (edited) Inserted link but realised it was already submitted. Edited April 27, 2015 by Paulstw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 27, 2015 So, what is PayPal up to? As pointed out, we aren't really supplying them with any "content," just letting them manage our hard-earned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 3,446 Posted April 27, 2015 (edited) So, what is PayPal up to? As pointed out, we aren't really supplying them with any "content," just letting them manage our hard-earned. The way I read it... its for cases for example where a company uploads their logo to a Paypal service.A bit like you may use the paypal logo on your website. So they are just covering their backsides with legalese, so to speak. Edited April 27, 2015 by John Mitchell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
