Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If I have a photograph of an individual who is wearing Oakley sunglasses, but you can't really tell they are Oakley (I know they are Oakley), can I sell the image without making it for editorial use only (since I clearly don't have a release from Oakley)?  I do have a model release from the individual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. Just RM and tick the box contains property that needs release you don't have.... Then up to the buyer to handle what use it will be for. But it will be some kind of editorial.

Edited by Niels Quist
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that mean it must be sold for "editorial use only" since I don't have a property release?


No, most likely it will mean that but a buyer can decide if they wish to use it in a way that doesn't need a PR such as changing the glasses to something more generic. Yuri Arcurs was being sued for featuring designer glasses in a lot of his images.


If you are going to shoot MR work, make sure that clothes and accessories are also free of any IP issues to make it a fully 'commercial' image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.