Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, M.Chapman said:

 

OK, let's not argue. I've done some looking on-line and can see similar examples (mis?)described glacial scouring and as layered intrusion. Do you know why these lines, over a huge area would all line up apparently perfectly with the flow of the glacier out of the corrie. Is it just chance, or is there some other reason? Did you look at DE15HY (and DE15M3) for wider context?

 

Mark

 

Yes but as I say you would never get such continuous and regular striae over such distances. Glacial scouring is formed by rocks of all shapes and sizes being carried along on the bottom of a glacier. The lineation towards the corrie may be something to do with preferential erosion along the pre-existing structure, probably long before glaciation began. Without reading about it in detail it is impossible to say but I am 100% certain that the regular marks are primary igneous features. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, MizBrown said:

I started watching a Netflix movie on Elsa Dorfman's portrait photography, then went out and photographed my sheets drying on the line. 

 

... and now it looks as if you (and the rest of us) might be being hung out to dry.

 

(sorry, couldn't resist)

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, M.Chapman said:

That's how many of our arguments finish up 🙂  MDM just knows so much stuff.

 

Mark

Geological yes but photography I tend to just give up Mark. I did spend years studying stuff like this. In fact I was offered a PhD on Skye and one on a volcano in Chile. It was a no-brainer decision. 

Edited by MDM
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Steve F said:

 

Oh damn, I should have posted in the 'Post a good thing that happened to to today post'! Yes, I got it back yesterday. Works fine. Except replacing some of the electronics is equivalent to a factory reset so I'm trying to remember what all my shortcut keys were set as....

 

Thanks a lot for the tip you gave me, much appreciated. They were very professional. Also never seen a camera place with so much decent professional equipment in before.

Glad you got it repaired Steve.  If you are talking about Fixation yes they are brilliant.  However, I'm surprised if you only came out with your repaired camera and not tempted to buy anything else😁

 

Oh, also check if you shoot RAW check it's on RAW as I know when I've taken mine there for whatever and/or sensor clean they put on jpeg and don't change it back to RAW.

 

Carol

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Steve F said:

 

Oh damn, I should have posted in the 'Post a good thing that happened to to today' thread! Yes, I got it back yesterday. Works fine. Except replacing some of the electronics is equivalent to a factory reset so I'm trying to remember what all my shortcut keys were set as....

 

Thanks a lot for the tip you gave me, much appreciated. They were very professional. Also never seen a camera place with so much decent professional equipment in before.

 Great Steve. Fixation is top class. Enjoy the new camera.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CAROL SAUNDERS said:

Glad you got it repaired Steve.  If you are talking about Fixation yes they are brilliant.  However, I'm surprised if you only came out with your repaired camera and not tempted to buy anything else😁

 

Oh, also check if you shoot RAW check it's on RAW as I know when I've taken mine there for whatever and/or sensor clean they put on jpeg and don't change it back to RAW.

 

Carol

 

Carol, fixation, yes, I was very impressed. Well, I try not to look too hard at lenses, I've already got four. But I'm starting to think F2.8 isn't enough for some lovely buttery bokeh so maybe I need an F1.8 or F1.4.... 🤦‍♂️🙃

 

I've got to play with all the settings. It's even making the annoying audible chirp again when it auto focuses...

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, AndrewP said:

Exactly! Photograph what others aren't!

 

PS. I'll still be in the middle of the Gold Tier if all these changes go ahead.

 

I'm in a similar position.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MDM said:

 

Yes but as I say you would never get such continuous and regular striae over such distances. Glacial scouring is formed by rocks of all shapes and sizes being carried along on the bottom of a glacier. The lineation towards the corrie may be something to do with preferential erosion along the pre-existing structure, probably long before glaciation began. Without reading about it in detail it is impossible to say but I am 100% certain that the regular marks are primary igneous features. 

Here's one of the sources I used (page 5) it's the same location

https://www.scottishgeology.com/wp-content/uploads/lfbg/LandscapeFashionedbyGeology-skye.pdf

Which only mentions glacial polishing - I'll add layered intrusion into my caption and keywords and put something in the notes

 

Mark

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, M.Chapman said:

Here's one of the sources I used (page 5) it's the same location

https://www.scottishgeology.com/wp-content/uploads/lfbg/LandscapeFashionedbyGeology-skye.pdf

Which only mentions glacial polishing - I'll add layered intrusion into my caption and keywords and put something in the notes

 

Mark

 

Quick glance Page 14 - mineral layering in gabbro  = layered intrusion. 

 

EDIT That is an excellent booklet. The whole section on roots of the volcanoes is relevant.  

Edited by MDM
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MDM said:

 

Yes but as I say you would never get such continuous and regular striae over such distances. Glacial scouring is formed by rocks of all shapes and sizes being carried along on the bottom of a glacier. The lineation towards the corrie may be something to do with preferential erosion along the pre-existing structure, probably long before glaciation began. Without reading about it in detail it is impossible to say but I am 100% certain that the regular marks are primary igneous features. 

 It's the university challenge speed of recall that impresses. 👍

  • Haha 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mr Standfast said:

 It's the university challenge speed of recall that impresses. 👍

 

If only 🤔. These days it is about knowing where to find info rather than having it ready to go. This is logic though really and the rocks are world famous as I said. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, MizBrown said:

I started watching a Netflix movie on Elsa Dorfman's portrait photography, then went out and photographed my sheets drying on the line. 

 

From Elsa Dorfmans Wiki page.   Camera on wheels...

 

Elsa_Dorfman_(2005).jpg

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, MDM said:

 

Quick glance Page 14 - mineral layering in gabbro  = layered intrusion. 

 

EDIT That is an excellent booklet. The whole section on roots of the volcanoes is relevant.  

Excellent - thanks. I'll change to layered intrusion and I see I need to add gabbro too.

 

Mark  (Thread hijack over)

Edited by M.Chapman
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, M.Chapman said:

Excellent - thanks. I'll change to layered intrusion and I see I need to add gabbro too.

 

Mark  (Thread hijack over)

 

At least we have come to an amiable conclusion based on rational argument and a diversion has not been harmful. I am available as a (well)-paid Earth science keyword checker in the unlikely event that Alamy take up your suggestion of random keyword checking 😃 .

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mr Standfast said:

 

From Elsa Dorfmans Wiki page.   Camera on wheels...

 

Elsa_Dorfman_(2005).jpg

 

The saddest thing is that what was a technological marvel in the 1950s or early 1960 was made obsolete by the rise of digital and she can't get the film now.  The detail in her photos is just wonderful.   My favorite print size is 20 by 16 and I've had a local printer get that size from some of my Nikon D300 shots, but 4x5 film was even more detailed. 

 

Love Dorfman's sunny nature -- making photos of people who were fundamentally happy.  I also hadn't realized Ginsberg was such an avid photographer.   I'd come across her when I was active on Photo.net.  

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Olivier Parent said:

 

 

We all have different points of view and we all have our own tolerance threshold but we are all responsible for our actions and, individually, for the way things evolve.

Stock agencies, whatever the name, cannot do anything without the consent of their contributors. We are where we are only because contributors have agreed to unacceptable terms, and continue to do so.

 

 

I agree Olivier which is why I think we have to get on to the next stage rather than wishful thinking imagining an Alamy that doesn't exist.

 

I wish you all the best with your decision to leave Alamy. I am not as brave as you but am certainly pausing any uploads while I consider what to do over the next few months. 

Edited by geogphotos
Link to post
Share on other sites

My reasons for going off topic were my own. Yet I will wear my red arrows with pride!

 

Now to get back on topic: We're stuffed!

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, David Pimborough said:

 

I agree ~ something as important as this, to all contributors, yet its being hi-jacked to yak about volcanoes and camera technique

 

Geez c'mon! 🤨

 

 

It was but a brief digression and will never happen again 🤫. I will confine myself to having fascinating endless and vital discussions about the meaning of words such as "agent" and "agency", an understanding of which is fundamental if we are to get any further in this thread and in stock photography in general. I will also (not) continue to flog the same old thing as hard as I can in as many different ways as I can imagine, while awaiting some fresh input from Alamy which is probably the only input of any real importance at this point. We are all going to leave or not. We are all going to die (the only certainty at this point).

 

I will try to make hilarious relevant comments such as "Nope but they'll have us working for peanuts and we'll go bust just give it time" even though we don't actually work for Alamy and "Sorry but I'm not going to go further with this I'm looking for proper jobs right now 😆" even though you are still posting in the thread.

 

However, I will point out the relevance of my initial pointing out to Mark that his keywords and descriptions of the rocks were incorrect in the context of Clause 4.4 (You will ensure that all Metadata including, without limitation, any and all other information pertaining to the Content: (i) is and will remain accurate and factually correct; ----). This little diversion does in fact illustrate the difficulty in abiding by such a clause without specialist knowledge. 

 

 

Edited by MDM
  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, John Mitchell said:

 

Good idea. You have a solid, well captioned and keyworded collection that you've put a lot of time and effort into.

 

It seems to me that UK-based contributors are ironically at something of a disadvantage on Alamy when it comes to making a lot of sales (except to "the papers" of course) due to the huge local competition, and the fact that every crag and cranny of the relatively small region appears to have been covered. Also, fees appear to be quite low in the UK, which is even more of an impediment for those looking for "Gold." Please correct me if I'm wrong about this.

 

Chicken Little Syndrome can be contagious. Best to wait to see just how much of the sky will end up falling IMHO. 🐔

 

 

 

 

Thank you. I think you're right. We are a tiny island with many photographers where travel is extremely well covered. Andrew's pics are excellent. There are some genres that can do well it seems. 👍

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Panthera tigris said:

Can we keep this thread on the topic subject - the draft/proposed new contract pls. Cheers.

Exactly!  This is a really important subject yet contributors insist on wandering away with whimsical irrelevant stories.  This is what Alamy wants.  They must be p-----g themselves laughing at us.

 

Bracing myself for the red arrows from the skulking cowards. 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gordon Scammell said:

<snip>  They must be p-----g themselves laughing at us.

 

Bracing myself for the red arrows from the skulking cowards. 

 

I don't think they're laughing at us. They might have been when they wrote the new contract.

But now I think they're spending a significant amount of time wondering how to rephrase the contract without it making them look like they were either being a bit naughty or that their legal team are hopeless at writing contracts.

 

I don't think I've ever dished out a red by the way. Received one or two, mind.

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Alamy locked this topic
  • Alamy unlocked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.