Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Steve F said:

Other people are still getting sales at 'normal' numbers...

Yes, it appears that some are, but also that some are not.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dave P said:

Yes, it appears that some are, but also that some are not.

I don't think Alamy have the staff numbers or inclination to pick on individual contributors. Especially small fry like us.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, meanderingemu said:

 

but finding implied correlations is much more fun. 

 

There's other words I might use! 😝

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Dave P said:

They're not foregoing sales! The sales are still being made. I'm suggesting that they're just not posting them to my account straightaway but are waiting until the end of next month when they can charge me 60% instead of 50%. Is this really so hard to understand? I can't see any other reason why there are suddenly no sales showing on my account in a period which would normally rack up four or five. Especially when I know there was a sale to the Guardian.

 

in the time i have been here I have never had a Guardian sales reported before month end, or following month if in second half of month.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Steve F said:

Other people are still getting sales at 'normal' numbers...

 

My sales volume have hardly altered for me, ranging from an average  45-60 a month, but who knows how this will change in the future when 'exclusive' vanishes and everything becomes mainstream and we're all put into the same melting pot.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, meanderingemu said:

 

in the time i have been here I have never had a Guardian sales reported before month end, or following month if in second half of month.  

That's fair enough, and yes, I'm probably jumping at shadows. But five weeks with not a single sale reported is very unusual for me. Unusual enough that I thought it worth asking if anyone else was experiencing the same.

 

And like I said, Alamy should think long and hard about just how much contributors like me distrust them, because long term it won't be good for business.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Dave P said:

They're not foregoing sales! The sales are still being made. I'm suggesting that they're just not posting them to my account straightaway but are waiting until the end of next month when they can charge me 60% instead of 50%. Is this really so hard to understand? I can't see any other reason why there are suddenly no sales showing on my account in a period which would normally rack up four or five. Especially when I know there was a sale to the Guardian.

Ah, I misunderstood you. You're alleging fraud, not spite.

We need a basic level of decency in the discussion here so can I suggest you withdraw your defamatory allegation? Whatever we think about the contract Alamy are not crooks.

NS sales, including Guardian, never report before the last week

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, spacecadet said:

Ah, I misunderstood you. You're alleging fraud, not spite.

A second misunderstanding - I'm not alleging anything. I simply said that a five week dry period was very odd and that with a commission change pending looked a bit suspicious. So I asked if anyone else was experiencing the same. If hundreds of contributors had piled in saying "Yes, me too!" THEN I would have made an allegation. But they didn't so I didn't.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Steve F said:

I don't think Alamy have the staff numbers or inclination to pick on individual contributors. Especially small fry like us.

 

but don't you see the big conspiracy all the Shareholders are withholding there sales report,  so they can get an extra pence dividend at the end of the year.  Makes me wonder why they reported the ones last month, since they already knew about this....  (why is there no tinfoil hat emoji?)

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, meanderingemu said:

 

but don't you see the big conspiracy all the Shareholders are withholding there sales report,  so they can get an extra pence dividend at the end of the year.  Makes me wonder why they reported the ones last month, since they already knew about this....  (why is there no tinfoil hat emoji?)

 

 

💡 I forgot about the shareholders! 🤦‍♂️

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dave P said:

Yes, it appears that some are, but also that some are not.

 

Quiet periods happen.

In February I had my first blank month in 5 years, then had an above average March, an average April and a best Month ever in May in number of sales and have a good start to June.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dave P said:

Yes, it appears that some are, but also that some are not.

 

Having a very poor month with 1 sale so far. That hasn't happened in years, but I put it down to "just one of those things". Maybe the distraction of the new contract and the issues it's causing internally have somehow effected sales. Doesn't make sense, but I wouldn't put it down to a concerted effort by alamy to manipulate sales or sales reporting. I also stopped uploading images this past month and I've wondered whether there is any connection between continuous uploading and placement in search results.

Edited by KFisher
spelling error
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, meanderingemu said:

 

a sale from UK news scheme at start of the month, that has never appeared until month end under current contract. How is that indicative? 

I’m not speaking on that. All I meant was meanings can be overlooked. His statement belongs to him, not me. I just try to give benefit of doubt when I think something said might be taken several ways. We all need to be as kind as we can be, especially in these troubling times. Don’t you think?

  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, John Morrison said:

Is paranoia the eighth stage of grieving?

 

8. paranoia

9. conspiracy theories

10. insurrection

 

😎

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Betty LaRue said:

I’m not speaking on that. All I meant was meanings can be overlooked. His statement belongs to him, not me. I just try to give benefit of doubt when I think something said might be taken several ways. We all need to be as kind as we can be, especially in these troubling times. Don’t you think?

Well said you 🙂 Thats the problem with message boards tbh...

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Betty LaRue said:

I’m not speaking on that. All I meant was meanings can be overlooked. His statement belongs to him, not me. I just try to give benefit of doubt when I think something said might be taken several ways. We all need to be as kind as we can be, especially in these troubling times. Don’t you think?

no problem..  not sure where i didn't give benefit of doubt.  all i mentioned was fact the sale example wasn't really one that fit the conspiracy theory that Alamy is withholding sales.   or are you saying there is a doubt about that and i should give it some benefit?

Edited by meanderingemu
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Jan said:

I don't understand the change at all but that can be caused by the language (i'm dutch). I don't have any exclusive images at Alamy. Now I have a blue model. What will that be when I don't change anything? All the changes in the past years weren't any advantage for the photographers at all. Is this another one?

Your income is being cut by 20% minimum. If Alamy get sued for any reason by ANYONE because of one of your images you must pay the legal fees. If Alamy loses the case YOU must pay the damages. Got it?

 

Uw inkomen wordt met minimaal 20% verlaagd. Als Alamy om welke reden dan ook door IEDEREEN wordt aangeklaagd vanwege een van uw afbeeldingen, moet u de juridische kosten betalen. Als Alamy de zaak verliest, moet JIJ de schadevergoeding betalen. Begrepen?

Edited by formerly snappyoncalifornia
  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, spacecadet said:

...and under English law, which governs the contract, unfair terms are unenforceable. There's also precedent that a term is unfair if it imposes uninsurable obligations on any party. One hopes, and it is no more than a hope, that Alamy would not start a case in those circumstances, although the fact that their lawyers have written in a potentially unfair term is unhelpful.

My point was that you expressed a willingness to sue, which isn't an attitude prevalent here.

I expressed a willingness to counter sue, there is a world of difference.  The point being if Alamy took an action against me by counter suing I would have some leverage to come to an agreement with them for both parties to drop their respective cases, thus I wouldn't be financially harmed. This attitude is called not being a victim.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not into conspiracy theories, but I've had eight sales so far this month, which is good, but they are all under $10. 😯

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Mitchell said:

I'm not into conspiracy theories, but I've had eight sales so far this month, which is good, but they are all under $10. 😯

Agree, no conspiracies, my license sales are as per usual this month and not all small ones. What I am annoyed about are corrections to past licenses and unreported licenses either for images I know have already been used or unreported news licenses that ought to have been reported by now that may or may not be reported before the contract change.

Edited by Sally
  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Mitchell said:

I'm not into conspiracy theories, but I've had eight sales so far this month, which is good, but they are all under $10. 😯

No conspiracy, just a harbinger

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Sally said:

Agree, no conspiracies, my license sales are as per usual this month and not all small ones. What I am annoyed about are corrections to past licenses and unreported licenses either for images I know have already been used or unreported news licenses that ought to have been reported by now that may or may not be reported before the contract change.

i agree, but this was always a problem with Alamy.  Sales date should be based on date of usage, not when client finally decides to report it.   

  • Upvote 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Alamy locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.