Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just had two sales for 11c each, so 4c to me! That's 40% of Sh***Stock's miserable payout. So, yep, I am nostalgic for those early sales.

  • Sad 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Colin Woods said:

I just had two sales for 11c each, so 4c to me! That's 40% of Sh***Stock's miserable payout. So, yep, I am nostalgic for those early sales.

 

I guess I should feel, by comparison, chuffed about a .49 cents sales that just dropped in! That's more than 4x what you got!! 😒

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say that I am thrilled at Alamy letting our images go at eleven cents. Even in the photo business I would have thought that there was a level at which you just say no, that you say you won't undervalue your own business and invite the buyer to go elsewhere. But quite clearly I am wrong.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Colin Woods said:

I can't say that I am thrilled at Alamy letting our images go at eleven cents. Even in the photo business I would have thought that there was a level at which you just say no, that you say you won't undervalue your own business and invite the buyer to go elsewhere. But quite clearly I am wrong.

 

Hi Colin,
This clearly goes nowhere and I am very disappointed to hear that Alamy is following that path.
May I ask what kind of license that was?

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Olivier Parent said:

May I ask what kind of license that was?

I don't know yet, I will see when the Sales page is updated this evening. It's so low that I wonder if it costs Alamy more in their staff's wages to deal with these deals than they make at eleven cents per shot. With the $ fees I always used to console myself saying that at least it would buy a coffee, but the $0.04 to me wouldn't even pay for the little wooden stick that you stir your coffee with. Its all pretty lamentable.

 

I just had a look, and its RF. I will put more details here this evening when I know.

Edited by Colin Woods
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Colin Woods said:

I don't know yet, I will see when the Sales page is updated this evening. It's so low that I wonder if it costs Alamy more in their staff's wages to deal with these deals than they make at eleven cents per shot. With the $ fees I always used to console myself saying that at least it would buy a coffee, but the $0.04 to me wouldn't even pay for the little wooden stick that you stir your coffee with. Its all pretty lamentable.

 

I just had a look, and its RF. I will put more details here this evening when I know.

 

Thank you Colin!

This will be informative about the value of a pixel today… 

But I suspect that it will not be reassuring.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Colin Woods said:

 

 

I just had a look, and its RF. I will put more details here this evening when I know.

Royalty free? More like just "Free".🙁

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Colin Woods said:

I just had two sales for 11c each, so 4c to me! That's 40% of Sh***Stock's miserable payout. So, yep, I am nostalgic for those early sales.

Well, Colin, I just saw this, and you have me beat.  I posted my 5c sale today in the "new low" thread.  Looks like a bulk deal for Alamy.  Not so much bulk for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First ten sales (in 2007) - $1152 gross, taking just under a year

Last ten sales - $216 gross, taking just over a week

 

Alex

Edited by Alex Ramsay
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Colin Woods said:

I just had two sales for 11c each, so 4c to me! That's 40% of Sh***Stock's miserable payout. So, yep, I am nostalgic for those early sales.

 

Uh-oh. My nostalgia is turning into neuralgia. 🤕

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Alex Ramsay said:

First ten sales (in 2007) - $1152 gross, taking just under a year

Last ten sales - $216 gross, taking just over a week

 

Alex

 

Working on the time scales.  $216 x 52 = $11,232     Assuming the same or similar income every week for a year.😉

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Olivier Parent said:

May I ask what kind of license that was?

 

Those two pie-in-the-face eleven cents sales were RF 1600x1000 pixels to China. As they are RF that is all the data given.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Colin Woods said:

 

Those two pie-in-the-face eleven cents sales were RF 1600x1000 pixels to China. As they are RF that is all the data given.

 

I guess it's a Chinese distributor then, so Alamy has no control over the pricing. It sounds as if eleven cents can go a long way in China.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Using a first 10 sales, last ten sales comparison as some have used here, I come up with these rather totals:

 

First 10 2003 = total $2134 Average $213.40

Last 10 2021 =   total $254 average  $25.40

 

The latter compounded with two .25 cent "any size, any placement, in perpetuity", editorial licences this week.

 

Depressing!

 

Rob

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal view as to what is killing/has killed the good fees is the digital camera. If we were still only able to shoot on film there would be a lot fewer photographers.

 

JMO.

 

Allan

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Allan Bell said:

 

Working on the time scales.  $216 x 52 = $11,232     Assuming the same or similar income every week for a year.😉

Allan

 

I wish!

 

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hardly bother looking at my sales these days until the very last day of the month as I know nothing will have sold. Sad

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Colin Woods said:

 

Those two pie-in-the-face eleven cents sales were RF 1600x1000 pixels to China. As they are RF that is all the data given.

My four were also RF to China.   But I also had one RM for 25/10 cents.  None mention novel use.  I wonder what the explanation for this is.

Is Alamy's new logo: "Microstock without the volume"?

Edited by Reimar
  • Sad 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Reimar said:

My four were also RF to China.   But I also had one RM for 25/10 cents.  None mention novel use.  I wonder what the explanation for this is.

Is Alamy's new logo: "Microstock without the volume"?

 

Aren't these really Chinese distributor sales? I imagine that microstock prices are the norm in China.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Allan Bell said:

If we were still only able to shoot on film there would be a lot fewer photographers.

But many people would still be willing to supply their images to agencies that license images for cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Colin Woods said:

But many people would still be willing to supply their images to agencies that license images for cents.

 

I think that there was a greater difference between consumer cameras and even serious amateur cameras in the 1960s through the last popular film cameras.  The amateur photos in the 1930s and 1940s may have been more likely to have been taken on bigger negatives with better lenses.  Newspapers could use lower resolution, but probably amateurs were less likely to take the news photos. 

 

The newspaper I worked for in 1975 used 35mm cameras, but not brands that I'd heard of.  The press prep guy developed the photos.  I remember seeing Speed Graphics for sale in a local camera shop in 1965 in Fayetteville, N.C., but don't remember seeing any press photographers using them. 

 

Dunno.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2008 Alamy licensed one of our images to concierge.com, for one of the "very secondary" pages. Back then concierge.com was a travel web site by Conde Nast, which I think became Conde Nast Traveler, not the present-day concierge.com, which is selling hospitality software solutions.

The license fee was $100.

I remember feeling insulted by the amount, given the client's pockets and how popular (=number of eyes) the web site was.

 

Fast forward 12 years. We just got a statement from an aggregator agency. There, there's a bunch of licenses from G. for 1 (one) cent ($0.01) each. Our commission is 50%. They round our commission up, so we do get a whole (!) cent per license. I think that sets the new low record. We'll have to write to the aggregator and politely ask what kinds of rights G. grants for 1 cent.

 

How things have changed. :(

 

GI

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

First ten: $815  (Feb 08 to July 09 - I was a slow starter)

 

Last ten: $192  (Jan 11 to Apr 11)

 

Quite a few 'Personal Use' sales for peanuts popping up these days. However, I was delighted to get a $1600 Exclusive sale last year so the incentive is still there.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.