Popular Post Peter Jordan 185 Posted December 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2020 On 1st December, I was in a garden centre and did a shot of some Christmas trees, thinking "That might do for next year" I was wrong, it sold on the 2nd December. Commercial website $4, so the news could have been better. 8 3 Link to post Share on other sites
AlexH 32 Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 Nice one, and of course it'll still be there to sell again next year! Link to post Share on other sites
Doc 2,030 Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 23 minutes ago, AlexH said: Nice one, and of course it'll still be there to sell again next year! or indeed this year! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
John Mitchell 4,669 Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 I had a similar image zoomed recently -- Xmas trees for sale outside a store. Looks like yours won. Commercial website use for $4 is a bit unnerving, though. 😣 Link to post Share on other sites
meanderingemu 1,127 Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 i had one similar in late January, uploaded, zoomed 2 days later , found the use major News org, however the comparison stops there hopefully. 2 months to report, and as of today, still as not cleared. Link to post Share on other sites
Marianne 868 Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 Nice work! Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Jordan 185 Posted December 3, 2020 Author Share Posted December 3, 2020 4 hours ago, Doc said: or indeed this year! I shoot Christmas trees every year, this shot was a bit different to usual, with a large board beside the tree with a price on it. £40 for a tree 0.8 - 1.0 metres high. That might be a bit out for next year. Still, the end date for the license was "in perpetuity" so the buyer saw some life in it. . . . Link to post Share on other sites
Inchiquin 886 Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 10 hours ago, Peter Jordan said: Still, the end date for the license was "in perpetuity" so the buyer saw some life in it. . . . More likely they thought at $4 it was a no-brainer. Alan Link to post Share on other sites
Stokie 776 Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 38 minutes ago, Inchiquin said: More likely they thought at $4 it was a no-brainer. Alan Perhaps they thought they were buying the tree! 😁 John. Link to post Share on other sites
meanderingemu 1,127 Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 (edited) of course it helps if Alamy makes images available. Images accepted yesterday still not available as of 3PM GMT, though my blue number is up. Edited December 4, 2020 by meanderingemu Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now