Jump to content

Post a good thing that happened in your life today


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, John Richmond said:

No.  But if I drink enough Speckled Hen this evening I should be able to generate a supply by morning.

 

I was going to follow my post up with, "HARD LUCK"

 

It was awful.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found a good used Nikon 60mm 2.8 D AF Micro lens for an acceptable price to use with my Nikon ES-2. Should finally start copying a selection of my B&W 35mm negatives for archival upload. Later will copy mainly colour family negatives. Will save me faffing around with my 55mm 2.8 and 90mm 2.8 macro lenses. Should have the lens next week.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 inches of snow wee hours and up to noon. I love snow. I got my studio lights set up today, boxed up Christmas decorations and made umpteen trips to the downstairs storage room.

Hope I get buns of steel.

I’m glad I have the lights set up because I can now shoot small items again in my light tent.

I’ve been having trouble finding replacement bulbs for my soft boxes in case one burns out. I want CFLs, 50-65watts, 5000-5500 Kelvin, CRI 90 or above for color accuracy.

The place I ordered my setup from doesn’t carry those particular bulbs anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parts of Sydney are off limits at the moment due to everyone's favourite virus so today I decided to head west. I drove with my wife to the historic town of Richmond and did a two hour self guided walk around photographing the historic buildings. The pleasant but "Twilight moment" (cue music now) though was when i came home and logged on, I found my first sale for 2021 was of a building in a street in Richmond, almost directly opposite where I had parked the car today.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Betty LaRue said:

5 inches of snow wee hours and up to noon. I love snow. I got my studio lights set up today, boxed up Christmas decorations and made umpteen trips to the downstairs storage room.

Hope I get buns of steel.

I’m glad I have the lights set up because I can now shoot small items again in my light tent.

I’ve been having trouble finding replacement bulbs for my soft boxes in case one burns out. I want CFLs, 50-65watts, 5000-5500 Kelvin, CRI 90 or above for color accuracy.

The place I ordered my setup from doesn’t carry those particular bulbs anymore.

 

Amazon probably. Search for Photography lights or Studio lights.

No use sending you mine: 220V. I'm trying to replace mine with LEDs. Not that easy with higher output (around 4000 lumen) bulbs.

Also like CFLs most of them show banding because of the frequency.

I bought one of these for small stuff and film copying. Mine was $26.15 exactly one year ago, so the price went up slightly.

Someone mentioned them here on the forum. Flicker free and CRI 95. Fits on a stand or tripod. Could just be perfect for the light tent.

 

wim

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wiskerke said:

 

Amazon probably. Search for Photography lights or Studio lights.

No use sending you mine: 220V. I'm trying to replace mine with LEDs. Not that easy with higher output (around 4000 lumen) bulbs.

Also like CFLs most of them show banding because of the frequency.

I bought one of these for small stuff and film copying. Mine was $26.15 exactly one year ago, so the price went up slightly.

Someone mentioned them here on the forum. Flicker free and CRI 95. Fits on a stand or tripod. Could just be perfect for the light tent.

 

wim

 

 

 

+1, no reason not to go to LEDs now. We haven't put in a CFL for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, spacecadet said:

+1, no reason not to go to LEDs now. We haven't put in a CFL for years.

 

Agree whole heartedly with use of LEDs. When I moved into my bungalow earlier last year (I was about to write this year) I changed all lighting to LEDs including security lighting outside which I installed myself. There had not been any SLs before I arrived. All my photographic lights have been LEDs for some time now.

 

Allan

 

PS We have a dusting of snow here.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I sat and watched geese on a local lake (which was frozen) sliding about on the ice for a good hour+ and it was a source of great amusement.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Allan Bell said:

 

Agree whole heartedly with use of LEDs. When I moved into my bungalow earlier last year (I was about to write this year) I changed all lighting to LEDs including security lighting outside which I installed myself. There had not been any SLs before I arrived. All my photographic lights have been LEDs for some time now.

 

Allan

 

PS We have a dusting of snow here.

 

We haven't retrofitted, because the energy saving is smallish, but just gone LED as and when the last spare CFLs disappeared. But for domestic use LEDs do give a better light, they come on at full lumens, and the equivalent wattages on the boxes tell the truth, which CFLs never did.

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, spacecadet said:

But for domestic use LEDs do give a better light, they come on at full lumens, and the equivalent wattages on the boxes tell the truth, which CFLs never did.

 

We use all LED bulbs in the house now. When an H4 headlamp bulb in my car failed recently I was going to replace with a pair of LED bulbs, but Halfords only had 1, and that had been opened a sealed up with tape. I'm ordering 2 for next time a headlamp bulb fails. I will likely change most of the other bulbs for their LED equivalent too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, sb photos said:

 

We use all LED bulbs in the house now. When an H4 headlamp bulb in my car failed recently I was going to replace with a pair of LED bulbs, but Halfords only had 1, and that had been opened a sealed up with tape. I'm ordering 2 for next time a headlamp bulb fails. I will likely change most of the other bulbs for their LED equivalent too.

Beware- replacement LED bulbs are not type approved unless the car was fitted with them originally. Although it probably won't be picked up in the MoT, using them in a headlamp designed for halogens is illegal and they may dazzle other drivers.

The only thing that is legal is a complete replacement LED headlamp unit.

https://www.autobulbsdirect.co.uk/blog/are-led-headlights-legal-in-the-uk/

https://www.powerbulbs.com/blog/2020/03/led-headlights-road-legal

 

Halfords have a disclaimer that they're for off-road or internal use only.

Edited by spacecadet
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been chewing my way through The Planets , a BBC/Open University series narrated by Brian Cox.

 

The good thing is that it is interesting and I'm learning quite bit while Prof Cox's explanations are clear and avoid overmuch technicality

 

But the bad thing is that there is so much empty time, screenfuls of him wandering across desolate regions, photos of clouds etc. The result is that whole thing takes far too long, extreme boredom sets in,  and I can't stand to watch more than 30 minutes at a time. 

 

I wish the producers of these programmes could move things on at a faster pace - maybe they are being paid by the minute ?   If the spoken sound track could extracted and used as a radio programme that would condense the delivery by at least 50% and would be far more entertaining. 

 

Rant over.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Bryan said:

I've been chewing my way through The Planets , a BBC/Open University series narrated by Brian Cox.

 

The good thing is that it is interesting and I'm learning quite bit while Prof Cox's explanations are clear and avoid overmuch technicality

 

But the bad thing is that there is so much empty time, screenfuls of him wandering across desolate regions, photos of clouds etc. The result is that whole thing takes far too long, extreme boredom sets in,  and I can't stand to watch more than 30 minutes at a time. 

 

I wish the producers of these programmes could move things on at a faster pace - maybe they are being paid by the minute ?   If the spoken sound track could extracted and used as a radio programme that would condense the delivery by at least 50% and would be far more entertaining. 

 

Rant over.

 

Agree with you that some TV programs go on too long. I used to watch a few 2 hour programs and often thought the story could have been told in one hour.

 

Allan

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Bryan said:I've been chewing my way through The Planets , a BBC/Open University series narrated by Brian Cox.

 

The good thing is that it is interesting and I'm learning quite bit while Prof Cox's explanations are clear and avoid overmuch technicality

 

But the bad thing is that there is so much empty time, screenfuls of him wandering across desolate regions, photos of clouds etc. The result is that whole thing takes far too long, extreme boredom sets in,  and I can't stand to watch more than 30 minutes at a time. 

 

I wish the producers of these programmes could move things on at a faster pace - maybe they are being paid by the minute ?   If the spoken sound track could extracted and used as a radio programme that would condense the delivery by at least 50% and would be far more entertaining. 

 

Rant over.


An alternative viewpoint. I’ve not watched this yet but I had a quick look at the first 10 mins on my iPad to see what you are talking about. While it is a rather thin experience on an iPad, I expect it must be quite different if viewed on a home cinema with surround sound. The cinematography is truly amazing for one thing but it needs to be viewed through the right medium with total immersion. 
 

The subject matter itself (planet formation and evolution) is to my mind incredibly fascinating and should really be general knowledge for most humans. So while this information could be imparted in a shorter time, it is all about the experience in this case. From the bit I watched, I give it the thumbs up and will watch it on a larger screen in due course. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDM said:


An alternative viewpoint. I’ve not watched this yet but I had a quick look at the first 10 mins on my iPad to see what you are talking about. While it is a rather thin experience on an iPad, I expect it must be quite different if viewed on a home cinema with surround sound. The cinematography is truly amazing for one thing but it needs to be viewed through the right medium with total immersion. 
 

The subject matter itself (planet formation and evolution) is to my mind incredibly fascinating and should really be general knowledge for most humans. So while this information could be imparted in a shorter time, it is all about the experience in this case. From the bit I watched, I give it the thumbs up and will watch it on a larger screen in due course. 

 

Well I don't have the benefit of surround sound or a home cinema, just a TV, so the experience is not quite so vivid for me.  However I did enjoy the graphics and computer simulations initially, but there are several 40 minute episodes in this series and it all began to wear a bit thin after a while - other than for the well considered and delivered dialogue and actual photos taken by the spacecraft.  Each to their own I guess  🙂

 

Have to agree that this, in condensed format, should be required, if a tad scary, knowledge for all.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bryan said:

 

Well I don't have the benefit of surround sound or a home cinema, just a TV, so the experience is not quite so vivid for me.  However I did enjoy the graphics and computer simulations initially, but there are several 40 minute episodes in this series and it all began to wear a bit thin after a while - other than for the well considered and delivered dialogue and actual photos taken by the spacecraft.  Each to their own I guess  🙂

 

Have to agree that this, in condensed format, should be required, if a tad scary, knowledge for all.

 

 

40 minutes too long for a science documentary? Perhaps you just don't like it much. I would regard a televised game of football as utter tedium.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Bryan said:

 

Well I don't have the benefit of surround sound or a home cinema, just a TV, so the experience is not quite so vivid for me.  However I did enjoy the graphics and computer simulations initially, but there are several 40 minute episodes in this series and it all began to wear a bit thin after a while - other than for the well considered and delivered dialogue and actual photos taken by the spacecraft.  Each to their own I guess  🙂

 

Have to agree that this, in condensed format, should be required, if a tad scary, knowledge for all.

 

 

 

I don't have a home cinema either but a lot of people do nowadays and just a TV covers a vast range of devices. The real point I was making is that it is meant to be an immersive visual experience, not one to be raced through. I understand your point as well. I will be in better position to judge after I watch it which I intend to do, one episode per session I expect. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, spacecadet said:

40 minutes too long for a science documentary? Perhaps you just don't like it much. I would regard a televised game of football as utter tedium.

Mark, my point is that you could get the information transferred much more efficiently if there was less time spent on the graphics, which tend to become repetitive over the course of all of the episodes.  It is a fascinating series, and it's well worth knowing what Cox has to say, but, and OK I guess I'm not the most patient person on the earth, it could be done in half the time.  

 

I confess I increasingly feel this about a lot of documentary TV, whatever the subject matter,  just cut to the chase ! 

 

I recall watching  a documentary about the Titanic disaster some years ago on commercial TV. The nub of the story was that a stoker had observed a fire burning in one of the coal bunkers and that his evidence was glossed over at the inquiry. In essence that was it, but it took an excruciatingly long time to tell the tale, and of course there were commercial breaks throughout. Before each break they would summarise what has been said, and then that summary was repeated after the break. By the end of the programme I  was tearing my hair out - which is why I now don't have very much  🙃

Edited by Bryan
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Bryan said:

Mark, my point is that you could get the information transferred much more efficiently if there was less time spent on the graphics, which tend to become repetitive over the course of all of the episodes.  It is a fascinating series, and it's well worth knowing what Cox has to say, but, and OK I guess I'm not the most patient person on the earth, it could be done in half the time.  

 

I confess I increasingly feel this about a lot of documentary TV, whatever the subject matter,  just cut to the chase ! 

 

I recall watching  a documentary about the Titanic disaster some years ago on commercial TV. The nub of the story was that a stoker had observed a fire burning in one of the coal bunkers and that his evidence was glossed over at the inquiry. In essence that was it, but it took an excruciatingly long time to tell the tale, and of course there were commercial breaks throughout. Before each break they would summarise what has been said, and then that summary was repeated after the break. By the end of the programme I  was tearing my hair out - which is why I now don't have very much  🙃

 

I think it is unwise to lump most TV documentaries together like this. Different people learn in different ways. Cutting to the chase works for me for educational stuff but I would be more inclined to do that with written material than video in any case as I learn well from reading.

 

Good documentaries should be more than just about learning in any case. If you don't like a documentary then there is a very simple solution  - switch it off. If you want to know more about the subject matter without enduring the programme, then the information is very likely to be available in readable form on the internet. 

 

I recall you mentioning the Ken Burns series on country music just over a year ago. That was very long but I enjoyed every episode and could have easily watched the same again because I was absolutely enjoying it. And despite the fact that it was very long, it managed to miss some very important bits of the history of country music. Cutting to the chase does not work for that. 

 

Thankfully the BBC is still able to function in making world class educational documentaries despite all the cutbacks, the dumbing down and the attacks from the commercial media - mostly that of a right wing populist flavour. Long live the BBC (and the NHS)


 

 

 

 

Edited by MDM
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/01/2021 at 07:47, wiskerke said:

 

Amazon probably. Search for Photography lights or Studio lights.

No use sending you mine: 220V. I'm trying to replace mine with LEDs. Not that easy with higher output (around 4000 lumen) bulbs.

Also like CFLs most of them show banding because of the frequency.

I bought one of these for small stuff and film copying. Mine was $26.15 exactly one year ago, so the price went up slightly.

Someone mentioned them here on the forum. Flicker free and CRI 95. Fits on a stand or tripod. Could just be perfect for the light tent.

 

wim

 

 

 

I did find some at Adorama. 65W, but I think they’ll work. Back ordered which is fine because I’m ordering them in case the ones I have quit working, and that could be a few years, even. I like to think ahead.

Yes, I’ve replaced my household lightbulbs with LED, but my softboxes were originally sent with 2 5500K CFLs. Plus I watched a video yesterday made by an artist who said he’d tried LED for painting watercolor and he went back to CFL. I think he said there was more banding with LED panels. (Not bulbs)

I bought the soft box and stands back when I had a job shooting jewelry. I discovered they were great for all small products. I had a homemade light tent for most of the time before buying one off Amazon.

Interesting LED panel for the camera, wim, but I prefer being able to put the light where I want it for product shooting, not necessarily from the front. Although I could see it being a nice addition to side lights.

Foremost, my lights are for artwork, second photography. Biggest gripe, when looking many do not give the CRI values. Important for art when one is mixing and choosing colors. I can’t just hit the WB button in Photoshop to get the true values. The paint is already on the paper. For those who don’t understand, yes you need sunlight-kelvin, between 5000-5500. CRI over 90 gives equal treatment to all colors, where CRI 80 and below might favor some colors over others.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDM said:

 

Thankfully the BBC is still able to function in making world class educational documentaries despite all the cutbacks, the dumbing down and the attacks from the commercial media - mostly that of a right wing populist flavour. Long live the BBC (and the NHS

 

On that we can agree !  We have donated to the save the BBC fighting fund.

 

I guess my gripe is with the insertion of barely relevant material, or continued repetition. It's particularly noticeable when the production team have spent a load of cash on computer simulations and perhaps feel that they have to maximise the use of the graphics, something which I feel applies to both the Titanic programme and this Planets production. The folk music show was filled with music, what's not to like ? - if you happen to like folk music!

 

I have to say that my wife, who is much more of a TV addict than I am - I watch very little drama -  gave up watching the Planets due to its slow delivery. I will persist, but through gritted teeth.

 

Edited by Bryan
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ed Rooney said:

Does Professor Cox play keyboards during the slow takes? 

 

Sadly not, none of his chums from Monty Python involved either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A year or two ago I watched some Brian Cox programs (cannot remember which series), but what was amazing was his explanation of space-time. He went in a fighter jet that can exceed the speed of the earth's rotation. Before exceeding that speed he and the pilot saw the sun set. Then they sped up to go faster than the earth's rotation and therefore saw the same sun rise in front of them again, turning night back into day. As such, their physical bodies in space lost their relativity to earth time. That was a spin out and helped me understand space-time better.

 

At times he does have a dreamy, delivery style, almost kind of hypnotic. I can see how if combined with long graphic sequences that could be kind of trance-like.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two couriers have just made a delivery to my home within 5 minutes of each other.

 

They got to meet Herbert the sausage dog.

And I have one box with a new Fuji X Pro3 in it.

And the other box has a used refurbished by Fuji 90mm lens in it.

(already have 25 and 40mm lenses from Leica)

 

Now to start playing.....

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.