Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My approach has usually been "would a loss of equipment put me out of business?"

If the answer is "no", as it always has been, I self- insure. When a camera goes phut- one of mine might have been covered by insurance, one certainly not- I buy a new one for about £200. When I used the Hasselblad I had a Rolleicord as a spare and had to use it once because of a repair.

Admittedly if I'd paid the OP's £1800 I would think again but even then, if that went west, I could always go with the £200 replacement. Then again, again, if I had £1800 for kit I might have another couple of £hundred for insurance.

I never leave equipment in a vehicle, locked out of sight or not- at least I could do that if I were insured but it's not very heavy.

I'm not recommending it just mentioning it. It doesn't work for indemnity insurance, because not many can afford £10M, but I don't have that, I have to settle for being careful.

I sound like the farmer in the field asked for directions who said "I wouldn't start from here". Hey ho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

During much of my assignment career, I had insurance, a camera floater. I was robbed two or three times. Collecting on insurance was not fun. In my later shooting life, the "insurance" I had was three sets of cameras. One I had with me, one was in the hotel, and one was back home. Now, living out of a suitcase, I have one or two cameras with me and the two others in the hotel. 



Edited by Ed Rooney
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.