spacecadet Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 My approach has usually been "would a loss of equipment put me out of business?" If the answer is "no", as it always has been, I self- insure. When a camera goes phut- one of mine might have been covered by insurance, one certainly not- I buy a new one for about £200. When I used the Hasselblad I had a Rolleicord as a spare and had to use it once because of a repair. Admittedly if I'd paid the OP's £1800 I would think again but even then, if that went west, I could always go with the £200 replacement. Then again, again, if I had £1800 for kit I might have another couple of £hundred for insurance. I never leave equipment in a vehicle, locked out of sight or not- at least I could do that if I were insured but it's not very heavy. I'm not recommending it just mentioning it. It doesn't work for indemnity insurance, because not many can afford £10M, but I don't have that, I have to settle for being careful. I sound like the farmer in the field asked for directions who said "I wouldn't start from here". Hey ho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 (edited) During much of my assignment career, I had insurance, a camera floater. I was robbed two or three times. Collecting on insurance was not fun. In my later shooting life, the "insurance" I had was three sets of cameras. One I had with me, one was in the hotel, and one was back home. Now, living out of a suitcase, I have one or two cameras with me and the two others in the hotel. Edo Edited August 8, 2019 by Ed Rooney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now