Search the Community

Here is something that I consider very powerful about the Alamy search engine. As you can see this page answers the client’s request, “I like this image, but show me the rest of the shoot” It is a very powerful sales tool. I keeps the rest of the shoot from becoming lost to the client. It shows your vertical and also your horizontal. And it shows your images Here is the page http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-deciduous-trees-forming-a-windbreak-and-farm-fence-in-winter-snow-129431313.html

Out of curiosity I went back through all the Alamy search engine result anomalies reported in this thread and find that all of them seem to be fixed. Search terms Previously reported result Latest Result walking dog park 5,963 6,767 walking dog park UK 59 1,538 walking park dog UK 1,405 1,538 park walking dog UK 1,405 1,538 walking dog UK park 66 1,538 hotel paris las vegas 1,216 8,215 las vegas hotel paris 7,106 8,215 mountain vancouver 166 5,499 vancouver mountain 30 5,499 mountain in vancouver 2,137 2,192 interesting, I though "in" would be ignored... grouse mountain vancouver 166 567 vancouver grouse mountain 518 567 stone wall lake district [WOP] [RM] 150 2,843 "stone wall" lake district [WOP] [RM] 2,101 2,097 All the above seem to have been fixed (although I thought "in" should be ignored)? Hope I haven't made any typos. Does this mean the search engine has now been fixed, or that Alamy have just patched the items reported to them above? Is anyone else still seeing any other anomalies?

I don't think that Alamy images appear in Google searches. Are there any plans to change this?