Jump to content

Callie

Verified
  • Content Count

    481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

314 Forum reputation = good

About Callie

  • Rank
    Forum regular

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.jwoodhouse.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Berlin

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    http://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={B1E64423-3197-4FF8-81DE-97BD20E39E87}&name=Julie+Woodhouse
  • Images
    10110
  • Joined Alamy
    17 Mar 2004

Recent Profile Visitors

749 profile views
  1. totally agree, no way am I spending time on this! Too much hassle, taking new images and keywording those properly seems more productive.
  2. I just had this. Germany has freedom of panorama too, German agencies have no problem accepting these images. Strange thing with the one they mailed me about though - it is this image A0KGNE Is this street art? When does graffiti become street art? Because Berlin has so many surfaces covered in what I would call graffiti, this will affect so many images. I do have many images of 'street art'taken around Berlin, such as CE926A "Yellow Man - street art by Otavio and Gustavo Pandolfo (known as Os Gemeos), Kreuzberg, Berlin, Germany", this is what I would be expecting ALamy to refer to (although under Germany's Freedom of Panorama it is not a problem) - all are marked as containing property with no release.
  3. Am I being over cautious? I virtually always tick property as yes, even for landscapes and cityscapes. Yet I know that if one of my agents uploaded a similar photo to Alamy they would tick no for the exact same buildings in my cityscape and set as royalty free.
  4. the problems with foliage seemed to me to be down to excess sharpening. It was certainly something I noted when I first got the camera - this is something also discussed at length on the fuji forum. The files need very little sharpening. In Lightroom the detail and amount sliders particularly need to be low - just checked one of my recent files which has a lot of foliage, my detail slider is down at 14, sometimes it is lower than this. No painterly effect in evidence at all.
  5. David re the focusing, have you tried changing the setting so the OIS is in mode 2, ie it works when you press the shutter button rather than the mode 1 continuous setting? When I first got the camera I was finding the focus a bit hit and miss and was recommended to do this - it really made a difference to me. Also turning it off when you don't need it certainly does improve focus. I'm also trying back button focus just now, which I am liking so far. My 10-24 is nice and sharp at the edges at 10mm from f8, softer at the edges at f4. Haven't had a problem with the colours yet, but I have not shot any portraits, only landscape and architecture and also always in good light. I'm shooting RAW, initial processing with Lightroom 6. btw, video is also quite pleasing, as compared to my 5dII - had some 4K clips accepted in the libraries I submit to anyway
  6. I got mine 3 weeks ago after first considering it last year. So far I am incredibly pleased with it, more than I expected to be and think my 5dII will probably just live in the studio from now. I got the 10-24 and 18-135 lenses both of which are excellent. I was really surprised with the 10-24 at how little distortion there is - also surprised at both with the quality, sharpness, lack of CA etc.
  7. $250 direct sale yesterday, for a food item photographed in my home studio
  8. better than last month thanks to a last minute $250 sale - made it an average month in the end
  9. Appalling - worst month for some years in terms of volume and prices.
  10. Callie, My workflow is the same as yours and I answered 'both'. The poll could have been worded a bit better. John. True - if it just said 'both' I would have chosen that but 'both equal' I wouldn't agree to because I would generally favour PS over LR.
  11. I had to answer neither which doesn't seem too accurate because I like them both for different elements - basically for pretty much the same reasons as djmorgan. Basic processing in LR then over to Photoshop for final tweaks, anything more complex and for checking at 100%. But always LR for keywording
  12. My number seems to include uploads that failed so is not the same number that I have on sale. Paulette thanks Paulette, interesting failed uploads are included too - surely all anyone wants to see is the images that are actually on sale here and those awaiting being put on sale.
  13. You can't see all the +50 tags when you select several images. That's the disaster: you can't get rid of duplicate tags in batch Cheers, Philippe I can. I've selected 4 images and I'm seeing over 150 tags and can delete them as required. Tricky to find an individual one though. Still wondering what's happened to QC though. I can't! When I select two images with 50+ tags, I see a lot less tags, and yes, I can eliminate some but can't add a new tag without seeing the message "You've exceeded the limit for tags on one or more of your selected images." . But when - after eliminating tags - I select just one of these two images, I see again ALL duplicate tags. Cheers, Philippe I get exactly the same problem Philippe - the reduced number of tags showing are because the duplicates are not shown. Can't add new because of exceeding the limit. I had gotten around this on day 1 when then system was deleting the extra words when we did a save. But that stopped working and seems to have made this impossible without going through every single image 1 by 1 and deleting out the duplicates 1 by 1. Way too much hassle.
  14. In the top left where it reads "All submissions Images ....." Mine says I have 10916 which is incorrect. I had suspected this is including deleted images. I just checked under a pseudo I previously used for moving images into that I wanted to delete, this still shows a preview of the images I deleted back in 2013. Why are they still there? Why are they included in the number of images count?
  15. On the odd times I have had exclusive licence sales Alamy have contacted me to check whether it had been licenced elsewhere, or might be in the future. yes it is highly probable that this is what the field is intended for but I think we need to know for certain. Its actually quite a lot of work to go through too, just on the off chance of an exclusive license. I answer my emails very fast anyway!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.