-
Content Count
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 Forum reputation = neutralAbout Mandevu
-
Rank
Forum newbie
Alamy
-
Alamy URL
https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={78F9F079-9ED8-43A5-8A5F-D6B4773D1E17}&name=Stefan+Dyk
-
Images
57
-
Joined Alamy
22 Nov 2017
-
That makes perfect sense. Will revise my submissions accordingly. Thanks!
- 7 replies
-
- discoverability
- visibility
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for constructive advice!
- 7 replies
-
- discoverability
- visibility
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK - will persevere. Thanks for advice.
- 7 replies
-
- discoverability
- visibility
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I've submitted a few photos now but, try as I might, have not been able to raise the status of my submissions beyond "Poor discoverability". I have read all the information I can find about how to improve "Discoverability" (and applied the advice to the best of my ability) but just can't get that orange bar to turn green. Can Alamy provide more precise information on how to achieve this?
- 7 replies
-
- discoverability
- visibility
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
QC of Rastor based illustrations vs Photos
Mandevu replied to Mandevu's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical talk
Thanks John, what you say makes sense. I will apply it next time I have illustration work to upload! -
Hi, I'm a newbie. I recently had a pencil sketch rejected (for two reasons: Compression artefacts + soft or lacking definition). My illustrations are produced digitally using Corel Painter (which is rastor based not vector) and a Wacom Tablet. The rejected illustration was drawn at 300 dpi resolution. I am not certain how I can correct for the above and wondering if anyone has specific advice on how to submit acceptable rastor illustrations vs photos? Am I missing something?