Jump to content

Duncan_Andison

Verified
  • Content Count

    1,028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Duncan_Andison

  1. Cheers... would that be Sony's 18-200? Did you try it before taking up the Tamron version? Thanks
  2. I have the same dilema with the 55-210mm I know it can produce good shots but the autofocus on it seems below par. I am currently looking at alternatives before heading off to Peru in July so if anyone can put forward some recommendations I would really appreciate it. For instance, 1. legacy zoom and adapter 2. New Alpha zoom with either the LA-EA2 oe EA1 adapter. 3. Or emount 18-200 from Sony or Tamron Cheers
  3. So do I understand right, someone viewed one of your images, which "water splash" was used and your own keywords do not have either of those words anywhere. Do people go day by day and look at every image search that someone does on ones own images? How did you find this error? Yes I check each day. Click on each search term so you can see which images of yours were viewed. Click on the image are check the keywording, description and location to make sure it is correct.
  4. So do I understand right, someone viewed one of your images, which "water splash" was used and your own keywords do not have either of those words anywhere. Do people go day by day and look at every image search that someone does on ones own images? How did you find this error? I look at what people searched for and whether the images presented are correct - good way to weed out errors. Can't say I do it every day, but try to do it as often as possible, doesn't take long. I'll also try to see whether the images presented are the 'best' ones. I've also seen a few strange views that I can't explain. Can't recall previously ever seeing an error in the search terms I can usually find why an image has been portrayed when I wouldn't expect it to. Essexps I do exactly the same. Each day check searches and make sure my keywording is relevant with no typos etc. Also, you need to pay close attention to description and location as the search will take into account what you put into these two boxes. I have found a few images in the past that have shown up in a search without the keywords but the words searched for were either in the description or the location. Careful wording in both of these is required to avoid false positives!
  5. Oh I so hope you are right. I have the Nex 7 and I know they are due a replacement very soon.... I am hoping that it will be available before I head over to the Peruvian Andes for a 3 week climbing holiday... with plenty of photography. If it does, I'll be getting one along with the 50mm 1.8 I think! Edit... just took a look at Sony Alpha Rumours and nothing there either.... :-(
  6. Well I suppose that's encouraging- four years in with regular sales I'm lower than that, so there's the flaw in bhz. Very true, not fool proof at all and not everyone takes part either. Seem to be averaging 3 sales a month at the moment with two thirds of my port being uploaded in the last 6 months so no complaints.... just got to keep working at it.
  7. After being stationary on page 18 since joining last May I've finally moved.... thankfully in a positive direction! One of my Main pseudos is now top third of page 8. Still plenty of work to do Can't check my others pseudos due to being a numpty... I forgot to make sure a BHZ image was included in them after a reshuffle of images between primary and secondary collections ... I'll check in a couple of days time!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.